Carneades and abstract dialectical frameworks: A reconstruction

Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications

Volumn 216, Issue , 2010, Pages 3-12

  Brewka, Gerhard ^a   Gordon, Thomas F ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^b FRAUNHOFER FOKUS   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATION THEORY;

ARGUMENT EVALUATIONS; ARGUMENTATION FRAMEWORKS; EVALUATION STRUCTURE; GENERALISATION;

PROBLEM SOLVING;

EID: 78049318581     PISSN: 09226389     EISSN: 18798314     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-619-5-3     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (10)

1. Katie Atkinson and Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon. Argumentation and standards of proof. In Proc. ICAIL, pages 107-116, 2007.
2. Stefan Ballnat and Thomas Gordon. Goal selection in argumentation processes. In Proc. COMMA (this volume), 2010.
3. Gerhard Brewka and Thomas Eiter. Argumentation context systems: A framework for abstract group argumentation. In LPNMR, pages 44-57, 2009.
4. Gerhard Brewka and Stefan Woltran. Abstract dialectical frameworks. In Proc. Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pages 102-111, 2010.
5. Phan Minh Dung. On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artif. Intell., 2(2):321-358, 1995.
6. Phan Minh Dung, Phan Minh Thang, and Nguyen Duy Hung. Modular argumentation for modelling legal doctrines of performance relief. In ICAIL'09: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pages 128-136, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM.
7. Arthur M. Farley and Kathleen Freeman. Burden of proof in legal argumentation. In Proc. ICAIL'95, pages 156-164, 1995.
8. Thomas F. Gordon, Henry Prakken, and Douglas Walton. The Carneades model of argument and burden of proof. Artif. Intell., 171 (10-15): 875-896, 2007.
9. Thomas F. Gordon and Douglas Walton. Proof burdens and standards. In Iyad Rahwan and Guillermo Simari, editors, Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, pages 239-258. 2009.
10. Matthias Grabmair, Thomas Gordon, and Douglas Walton. Probabilistic semantics for the Carneades argument model using Bayesian belief networks. In Proc. COMMA (this volume), 2010.