A unified setting for inference and decision: An argumentation-based approach

Proceedings of the 21st Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, UAI 2005

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 26-33

  Amgoud, Leila ^a  

^a IRIT   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING;

ARGUMENTATION FRAMEWORKS; ARGUMENTATION SYSTEMS; CASE BASED; DECISION UNDER UNCERTAINTY; HANDLING INCONSISTENCIES; KNOWLEDGE BASIS; MAKING DECISION; MULTIPLE-CRITERIA DECISIONS;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 78650473611     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. L. Amgoud, M. Caminada, C. Cayrol, S. Doutre, M. Lagasquie, H. Prakken, and G. Vreeswijk. Towards a consensual formal model: inference part. Technical report, Deliverable D2.2: Draft Formal Semantics for Inference and Decision-Making. ASPIC project, 2004.
2. L. Amgoud and C. Cayrol. Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks. International Journal of Automated Reasoning, Volume 29, N2:125-169, 2002.
3. L. Amgoud and H. Prade. Using arguments for making decisions. In Proceedings of the 20th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 10-17, 2004.
4. B. Bonet and H. Geffner. Arguing for decisions: A qualitative model of decision making. In Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 98-105, 1996.
5. D. Dubois, L. Godo, H. Prade, and A. Zapico. On the possibilistic decision model: from decision under uncertainty to case-based decision. Int. J. of Uncert., Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Syst., 7:6:631-670, 1999. (Pubitemid 129629997)
6. D. Dubois, H. Prade, and R. Sabbadin. Decisiontheoretic foundations of qualitative possibility theory, volume 128. European Journal of Operational Research, 2001.
7. P. M. Dung. On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence, 77:321-357, 1995.
8. J. Fox and S. Parsons. On using arguments for reasoning about actions and values. In Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Qualitative Preferences in Deliberation and Practical Reasoning, Stanford, 1997.
9. B. Franklin. Letter to j. b. priestley, 1772, in the complete works, j. bigelow, ed.,. New York: Putnam, page 522, 1887.
10. P. Krause, S. Ambler, M. Elvang-Gøransson, and J. Fox. A logic of argumentation for reasoning under uncertainty. Computational Intelligence, 11:113-131, 1995.
11. H. Prakken and G. Sartor. Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorties. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics, 7:25-75, 1997.