Assessing student performance and perceptions in lecture capture vs. face-to-face course delivery

Journal of Information Technology Education:Research

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 295-307

  Euzent, Patricia ^a   Martin, Thomas ^a   Moskal, Patrick ^a   Moskal, Patsy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Lecture capture instruction; Online learning; Student perceptions; Student performance; Video streaming

Indexed keywords

DISTANCE EDUCATION; E-LEARNING; ECONOMICS; EDUCATION; VIDEO STREAMING;

FACE-TO-FACE INSTRUCTION; INSTRUCTIONAL METHODS; LECTURE CAPTURE INSTRUCTIONS; ONLINE LEARNING; STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTIONS; STUDENT PERCEPTIONS; STUDENT PERFORMANCE; TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCES;

STUDENTS;

EID: 84859189484     PISSN: 15479714     EISSN: 15393585     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.28945/1515     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Allen, M., Mabry, E., Mattrey, M., Bourhis, J., Titsworth, S., & Burrell, N. (2004). Evaluating the effectiveness of distance learning: A comparison using meta-analysis. Journal of Communication. 54(30), 402-420.
2. Arbaugh, J.B., Godfrey, M. R., Johnson, M., Pollack, B. L., Niendorf, B., & Wresch, W. (2009). Research in online and blended learning in the business disciplines: Key findings and possible future directions. Internet and Higher Education, 12, 71-87.
3. th Proceedings of the ED-MEDIA 2001 World Conference on Education Multimedia & Telecoummunications, Tampere, Finland.
4. Cascaval, R. C., Fogler, K. A., Abrams, G. D., & Durham, R. L. (2008). Evaluating the benefits of providing archived online lectures to in-class math students. Journal of Asychronous Learning Networks, 12(3-4), 61-70.
5. Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53(4), 445-459.
6. Clark, R. E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42, 21-29.
7. Craig, J., Gregory, S., El Haggan, A., Braha, H., & Brittan-Powell, C. (2009, November). Lecture capture systems: Are they worth it? Paper presented at the Educause Mid-Atlantic Regional Conference, Phila-delphia, PA.
8. Dey, E. L., Burn, H. E., & Gerdes, D. (2009). Bringing the classroom to the web: Effects of using new technologies to capture and deliver lectures. Research in Higher Education, 50, 377-393.
9. Diaz, D. P. (2002, May/June). Online drop rates revisited. The Technology Source. Retrieved October, 2011 from http://ts.mivu.org/default.asp?show=article&id=981.
10. Figlio, D., Rush, N., & Yin, L. (2010). Is it live or is it Internet? Experimental estimates of the effects of online instruction on student learning. Cambridge MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
11. Gratton-Lavoie, C., & Stanley, D. (2009). Teaching and learning principles of microeconomics online: An empirical assessment. Journal of Economic Education, 40(1), 3-25.
12. Kozma, R. B. (1994). A reply: Media and methods. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42, 11-14.
13. Lehman, J. D., & Brickner (1996). Teachers' uses and perceptions of interactive videodiscs in the science classroom. The Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 15, 85-102.
14. McFarland, D., & Hamilton, D. (2005). Factors affecting student performance and satisfaction: Online vs. traditional course delivery. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 46(2), 25-33.
15. McLaren, C. H. (2004). A comparison of student persistence and performance in online and classroom business statistics experiences. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 2(1), 1-10.
16. Means, B., Toyama, Y, Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2009). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Center for Technology in Learning for the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development Policy and Program Studies Service. Available at: www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/opepd/ppss/reports.html.
17. Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance education: A systems view. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
18. Moskal, P., Caldwell, R., & Ellis, T. (2009). Evolution of a computer-based testing laboratory. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 5(6). Available at http://www.innovateonline.info/index.php?view=article&id=672.
19. Moskal, P. D., Dziuban, C., Upchurch, R., Hartman, J., & Truman, B. (2006). Assessing online learning: What one university learned about student success, persistence, and satisfaction. peerReview, 8(4), 26-29.
20. Navarro, P. (2000) Economics in the cyber classroom. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14, 119-32.
21. Nicholson, J., & Nicolson, D. B. (2010). A stream runs through IT: Using streaming video to teach information technology. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 27(1), 17-24.
22. Russell, T. (2006). No significant difference phenomenon. Accessed May 17, 2010 from http://www.nosignificantdifference.org.
23. Sanders, D. W., & Morrison-Shetlar, A. I. (2001). Student attitudes toward web-enhanced instruction in an introductory biology course. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33, 251-262.
24. Sitzmann, T., Kraiger, K., Stewart, D., & Wisher, R. (2006). The comparative effectiveness of web-based and classroom instruction: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 59, 623-664.
25. Wise, M., & Groom, F. M. (1996). The effects of enriching classroom learning with the systematic employment of multimedia. Education, 117, 61-69.