Measuring change in the subjective experience of hypnosis

International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 23-39

  McConkey, Kevin M ^a   Wende, Vanessa ^a   Barnier, Amanda J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; BEHAVIOR MODIFICATION; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYPNOSIS; LIFE EVENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; REVIEW;

EID: 0032947063     PISSN: 00207144     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207149908410020     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. Balthazard, C. G., & Woody, E. Z. (1985). The "stuff" of hypnotic performance: A review of psychometric approaches. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 283-296.
2. Bowers, K. (1981). Do the Stanford scales tap the "classic suggestion effect"? International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 29, 42-53.
3. Bowers, P. (1982). The classic suggestion effect: Relationships with scales of hypnotizability, effortless experiencing, and imagery vividness. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 30, 270-279.
4. Bowers, P., Laurence, J. -R., & Hart, D. (1988). The experience of hypnotic suggestions. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 36, 336-349.
5. Cheek, D. B. (1959). Use of rebellion against coercion as mechanism for hypnotic trance deepening. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 7, 223-227.
6. Evans, F. J., & Orne, M. T. (1965). Motivation, performance, and hypnosis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 13, 103-116.
7. Evans, F. J., & Orne, M. T. (1971). The disappearing hypnotist: The use of simulating subjects to evaluate how subjects perceive experimental procedures. International Journal of Experimental and Clinical Hypnosis, 19, 277-296.
8. Field, P. B. (1966). Some self-rating measures related to hypnotizability. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 23, 1179-1187.
9. Hammer, A. G., Evans, F. J., & Bartlett, M. (1963). Factors in hypnosis and suggestion. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 15-23.
10. Kirsch, I., Council, J. R., & Wickless, C. (1990). Subjective scoring for the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 38, 112-124.
11. Laurence, J. -R., & Nadon, R. (1986). Reports of hypnotic depth: Are they more than mere words? International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 34, 215-233.
12. McConkey, K. M. (1991). The construction and resolution of experience and behavior in hypnosis. In S. J. Lynn & J. W. Rhue (Eds.), Theories of hypnosis: Current models and perspectives (pp. 542-563). New York: Guilford.
13. McConkey, K. M., Sheehan, P. W., & Law, H. G. (1980). Structural analysis of the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 28, 164-175.
14. Nace, E. P., & Orne, M. T. (1970). Fate of an uncompleted posthypnotic suggestion. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 75, 278-285.
15. O'Connell, D. N. (1964). An experimental comparison of hypnotic depth measured by self-ratings and by an objective scale. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 12, 34-46.
16. Orne, M. T., & Evans, F. J. (1966). Inadvertent termination of hypnosis with hypnotized and simulating subjects. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 14, 61-78.
17. Perry, C. (1977). Unconcealed hypnotic suggestions: The effects of hypnotic depth and hypnotic skill on their posthypnotic persistence. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86, 570-574.
18. Perry, C., & Laurence, J. -R. (1980). Hypnotic depth and hypnotic susceptibility: A replicated finding. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 28, 272-280.
19. Radtke, H. L., & Spanos, N. P. (1981). Was I hypnotized? A social psychological analysis of hypnotic depth reports. Psychiatry, 44, 359-376.
20. Sheehan, P. W. (1992). The phenomenology of hypnosis and the Experiential Analysis Technique. In E. Fromm & M. R. Nash (Eds.), Contemporary hypnosis research (pp. 364-389). New York: Guilford.
21. Sheehan, P. W., & McConkey, K. M. (1982). Hypnosis and experience: The exploration of phenomena and process. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22. Sheehan, P. W., McConkey, K. M., & Cross, D. (1978). Experiential analysis of hypnosis: Some new observations on hypnotic phenomena. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87, 570-573.
23. Shor, R. E. (1970). The three-factor theory of hypnosis as applied to the book-reading fantasy and to the concept of suggestion. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 18, 89-98.
24. Shor, R. E. (1979). A phenomenological method for the measurement of variables important to an understanding of the nature of hypnosis. In E. Fromm & R. E. Shor (Eds.), Hypnosis: Developments in research and new perspectives (pp. 105-135). New York: Aldine.
25. Shor, R. E., & Orne, E. C. (1962). Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
26. Sutcliffe, J. P. (1961). "Credulous" and "skeptical" views of hypnotic phenomena: Experiments on esthesia, hallucination, and delusion. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 189-200.
27. Tart, C. T. (1970). Self-report scales of hypnotic depth. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 18, 105-125.
28. Tart, C. T. (1979). Measuring the depth of an altered state of consciousness, with particular reference to self-report scales of hypnotic depth. In E. Fromm & R. E. Shor (Eds.), Hypnosis: Developments in research and new perspectives (pp. 567-601; 2nd Rev. ed.). New York: Aldine.
29. Weitzenhoffer, A. M., & Hilgard, E. R. (1962). Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form C. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.