Slipping into trance

Contemporary Hypnosis

Volumn 25, Issue 3-4, 2008, Pages 202-209

  Kirsch, Irving ^a   Mazzoni, Giuliana ^a   Roberts, Kathrine ^a   Dienes, Zoltan ^b   Hallquist, Michael N ^c   Williams, John ^c   Lynn, Steven Jay ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HULL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

^c BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Altered state; Hypnosis; Suggestion; Trance

Indexed keywords

EID: 61849106588     PISSN: 09605290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ch.361     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Barabasz AF (2005-2006) Whither spontaneous hypnosis: a critical issue for practitioners and researchers. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis 48(2-3): 91-7.
2. Barber TX (1969) Hypnosis: A Scientific Approach. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
3. Barber TX, Glass LB (1962) Significant factors in hypnotic behaviour. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 64: 222-8.
4. Bowers KS (1993) The Waterloo-Stanford Group C (WSGC) scale of hypnotic susceptibility: normative and comparative data. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 41: 35-46.
5. Braffman W, Kirsch I (1999) Imaginative suggestibility and hypnotizability: an empirical analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77(3): 578-87.
6. Cohen J (1992) A power primer. Psychological Bulletin 112(1): 155-9.
7. Glass LB, Barber TX (1961) A note on hypnotic behaviour, the definition of the situation, and the placebo effect. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 132: 539-41.
8. Hilgard ER (1967) Individual differences in hypnotizability. In: JE Gordon (ed.) Handbook of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis. New York: Macmillan, 391-443.
9. Hilgard ER, Tart CT (1966) Responsiveness to suggestions following waking and imagination instructions and following induction of hypnosis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 71: 196-208.
10. Hull CL (1933) Hypnosis and Suggestibility: An Experimental Approach. New York: Appleton-Century Crofts.
11. Iani C, Ricci F, Gherri E, Rubichi S (2006) Hypnotic suggestion modulates cognitive conflict: the case of the flanker compatibility effect. Psychological Science 17: 721-7.
12. Kihlstrom JF (2008) The domain of hypnosis, revisited. In: MR Nash, A Barnier (eds) Oxford Handbook of Hypnosis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 21-52.
13. Kirsch I (1997) Suggestibility or hypnosis: what do our scales really measure? International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 45: 212-25.
14. Kirsch I, Lynn SJ, Rhue JW (1993) Introduction to clinical hypnosis. In: JW Rhue, SJ Lynn, I Kirsch (eds) Handbook of Clinical Hypnosis. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 3-22.
15. Kosslyn SM, Thompson WL, Costantini-Ferrando MF, Alpert NM, Spiegel D (2000) Hypnotic visual illusion alters colour processing in the brain. American Journal of Psychiatry 157: 1279-84.
16. Nash MR (2005) The importance of being earnest when crafting definitions: science and scientism are not the same thing. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 53: 265-80.
17. Sarbin TR, Coe WC (1972) Hypnosis: A Social Psychological Analysis of Influence Communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
18. Spanos NP, Chaves JF (eds) (1989) Hypnosis: The Cognitive-behavioural Perspective. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
19. Spanos NP, Radtke HL, Hodgins DC, Bertrand LD, Stam HJ, Dubreuil DL (1983) The Carleton University Responsiveness to Suggestion Scale: stability, reliability, and relationships with expectancy and 'hypnotic' experiences. Psychological Reports 53: 555-63.
20. Tart CT, Hilgard ER (1966) Responsiveness to hypnosis under 'hypnosis' and 'waking imagination' conditions: a methodological observation. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 14: 247-56.
21. Weitzenhoffer AM (1980) Hypnotic susceptibility revisited. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis 22: 130-46.
22. Weitzenhoffer AM, Sjoberg BM (1961) Suggestibility with and without 'induction of hypnosis'. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 132: 204-20.