The relationship between musculoskeletal stress markers and biomechanical properties of the humeral diaphysis

American Journal of Physical Anthropology

Volumn 147, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 618-628

  Niinimäki, Sirpa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

Author keywords

enthesis; physical activity; sex specific bone remodeling

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARM MUSCLE; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE REMODELING; DELTOID MUSCLE; DIAPHYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMERUS; LONG BONE; MALE; MECHANICAL STRESS; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM; PECTORALIS MAJOR MUSCLE; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY; SCORING SYSTEM; SEX DIFFERENCE; SKELETAL MUSCLE; SKELETON; TORSION;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE REMODELING; DIAPHYSES; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; HUMERUS; MALE; MUSCLE, SKELETAL;

EID: 84859100652     PISSN: 00029483     EISSN: 10968644     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.22023     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Alves-Cardoso F, Henderson CY,. 2010. Enthesopathy formation in the humerus: data from known age-at-death and known occupation skeletal collections. Am J Phys Anthropol 141: 550-560.
2. Anderson JJB,. 2001. Calcium requirements during adolescence to maximize bone health. J Am Coll Nutr 20: 186S-191S.
3. Bass WM,. 1987. Human osteology: a laboratory and field manual, 3rd ed. Columbia, MO: Missouri Archeological Society.
4. Benjamin M, Evans EJ, Copp L,. 1986. The histology of tendon attachment to bone in man. J Anat 149: 89-100.
5. Benjamin M, Kumai T, Milz S, Boszczyk BM, Boszczyk AA, Ralphs JR,. 2002. The skeletal attachment of tendon-tendon "enthesis." Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 133: 931-945.
6. Bridges PS,. 1997. The relationship between muscle markings and diaphyseal strength in prehistoric remains from West-Central Illinois. Am J Phys Anthropol 24: 82 [abstract].
7. Chen X, Macica C, Nasiri A, Judex S, Broadus AE,. 2007. Mechanical regulation of PTHrP expression in entheses. Bone 41: 752-759.
8. Churchill SE, Morris AG,. 1998. Muscle marking morphology and labor intensity in prehistoric Khoisan foragers. Int J Osteoarcheol 8: 390-411.
9. Daly R,. 2007a. The effect of exercise on bone mass and structural geometry during growth. In:, Daly R, Petit M, editors. Optimizing bone mass and strength. The role of physical activity and nutrition during growth. Basel: Karger, pp. 33-49.
10. Daly R,. 2007b. The effect of exercise on bone mass and structural geometry during growth. Med Sport Sci 51: 33-49.
11. Duan Y, Turner CH, Kim B-T, Seeman E,. 2001. Sexual dimorphism in vertebral fragility is more a result of gender differences in age-related bone gain than bone loss. J Bone Miner Res 16: 2267-2275.
12. Enlow D,. 1990. Facial growth. Philadelphia: W.W. Saunders.
13. Eshed V, Gopher A, Galili E,. 2004. Musculoskeletal stress markers in Natufian hunter-gatherers and Neolithic farmers in the Levant: the upper limb. Am J Phys Anthropol 123: 303-315.
14. Feik SA, Thomas CDL, Clement JG,. 1996. Age trends in remodeling of the femoral midshaft differ between the sexes. JOrthoped Res 14: 590-597.
15. Ferretti JL, Capozza RF, Cointry GR, Garcia SL, Plotkin H, Alvarez Filgueira ML, Zanchetta JR,. 1998. Gender-related differences in the relationship between densitometric values of whole-body bone mineral content and lean body mass in humans between 2 and 87 years of age. Bone 22: 683-690.
16. Forbes GB,. 1987. Human body composition: growth, aging, nutrition and activity. New York: Springer-Verlag.
17. Forwood MR, Burr DB,. 1993. Physical activity and bone mass: exercises in futility? Bone Miner 21: 89-112.
18. Frost HM,. 1987. Bone "mass" and the "mechanostat." A proposal. Anat Rec 219: 1-9.
19. Gallagher D, Visser M, de Meersman RE, Sepúlveda D, Baumgartner RN, Pierson RN, Harris T, Heymsfield SB,. 1997. Appendicular skeletal muscle mass: effects of age, gender, and ethnicity. J Appl Physiol 83: 229-239.
20. Gosling JA, Harris PF, Whitmore I, Willan PLT,. 2002. Human anatomy: color atlas and text, 4th ed. Edinburgh: Mosby.
21. Havelková P, Villotte S,. 2007. Enthesopathies: test of the reproducibility of the new scoring system based on current medical data. Slovenská Antropol 10: 51-57.
22. Hawkey D, Merbs C,. 1995. Activity-induced musculoskeletal stress markers (MSM) and subsistence strategy changes among ancient Hudson Bay Eskimos. Int J Osteoarcheol 5: 324-338.
23. Holt BM,. 2003. Mobility in Upper Paleolithic and Mesolithic Europe: evidence from the lower limb. Am J Phys Anthropol 122: 200-215.
24. Hirschberg J,. 2005. Simulations of mechanical adaptation and their relationship to stress bearing in skeletal tissue. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Western Australia.
25. Janssen I, Heymsfield SB, Wang Z, Ross R,. 2000. Skeletal muscle mass and distribution in 468 men and women aged 18-88 yr. J Appl Physiol 89: 81-88.
26. Johnston CC, Slemenda CW,. 1993. Determinants of peak bone mass. Osteoporosis Int Suppl 1: S54-S55.
27. Jurmain R, Roberts C,. 2008. Juggling the evidence: the purported "acrobat" from Tell Brak. Antiquity 28 (318).
28. Kannus P, Haapasalo H, Sankelo M, Sievänen H, Pasanen M, Heinonen A, Oja P, Vuori I,. 1995. Effect of starting age of physical activity on bone mass in the dominant arm of tennis and squash players. Ann Intern Med 123: 27-31.
29. Kennedy KAR,. 1989. Skeletal markers of occupational stress. In:, Işcan M, Kennedy K, editors. Reconstruction of life from the skeleton. New York: Alan R. Liss. p 129-160.
30. Lieberman DE, Pearson OM, Polk JD, Demes B, Crompton AW,. 2003. Optimization of bone growth and remodeling in response to loading in tapered mammalian limbs. J Exp Biol 206: 3125-3138.
31. Lieberman DE, Polk JD, Demes B,. 2004. Predicting long bone loading from cross-sectional geometry. Am J Phys Anthropol 123: 156-171.
32. Mariotti V, Facchini F, Belcastro MG,. 2004. Enthesopathies-proposal of a standardized scoring method and applications. Coll Anthropol 1: 145-159.
33. Martin R, Saller K,. 1957. Lehrbuch der anthropologie, band I. Stuttgart: Fischer.
34. Martin RB,. 2007. The importance of mechanical loading in bone biology and medicine. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 7: 48-53.
35. McIntyre LM, Bruce G,. 2010. Excavating All Saints: a medieval church rediscovered. Curr Archeol 245: 30-37.
36. Molnar P,. 2006. Tracing prehistoric activities: musculoskeletal stress marker analysis of a StoneAge population on the island of Gotland in the Baltic sea. Am J Phys Anthropol 129: 12-23.
37. Nagy BLB,. 1998. Age, activity, and musculoskeletal stress markers. Am J Phys Anthropol 26: 168-169 [abstract].
38. Nagy BLB,. 1999. Bioarcheological evidence for atl-atl use in prehistory. Am J Phys Anthropol 28: 208 [abstract].
39. Niinimäki S,. 2011. What do muscle marker ruggedness scores actually tell us? Int J Osteoarcheol 21: 292-299.
40. Niinimäki S, Niskanen M, Nieminen M, Tuukkanen J, Junno J-A,. 2012 Modeling skeletal traits and functions of the upper body: comparing archeological and anthropological material. J Anthropol Archeol, DOI: 10.1016/j.jaa.2012.01.004.
41. Nolan J, Harbottle B, Vaughan J,. 2010. The early medieval cemetery at the Castle, Newcastle upon Tyne. Arch Aeliana (5th Series) 39: 147-287.
42. Parfitt AM,. 2004. The attainment of peak bone mass: what is the relationship between muscle growth and bone growth? Bone 34: 767-770.
43. Pearson OM, Lieberman DE,. 2004. The aging of Wolff's "law": ontogeny and responses to mechanical loading in cortical bone. Yrb Phys Anthropol 47: 63-99.
44. Petit MA, Beck TJ, Lin H-M, Bentley C, Legro RS, Lloyd T,. 2004. Femoral bone structural geometry adapts to mechanical loading and is influenced by sex steroids: the Penn State young women's health study. Bone 35: 750-759.
45. Rhodes JA, Knüsel CJ,. 2005. Activity-related skeletal change in medieval humeri: cross-sectional and architectural alterations. Am J Phys Anthropol 128: 536-546.
46. Robb J,. 1998. The interpretation of skeletal muscle sites: a statistical approach. Int J Osteoarcheol 8: 363-377.
47. Rowe KR,. 2006. The measurement of composite variables from multiple indicators: applications in quality assurance and accreditation systems-childcare. Australian Council for Educational Research. Background paper prepared for the National Childcare Accreditation Council, Australia.
48. Ruff C,. 2000a. Body mass prediction from skeletal frame size in elite athletes. Am J Phys Anthropol 113: 507-517.
49. Ruff C,. 2000b. Body size, body shape, and long bone strength in modern humans. J Hum Evol 38: 269-290.
50. Ruff C,. 2003. Growth in bone strength, body size, and muscle size in a juvenile longitudinal sample. Bone 33: 317-329.
51. Ruff CB, Hayes W, 1983. Cross-sectional geometry of Pecos Pueblo femora and tibiae-a biomechanical investigation: II. Sex, age, and side differences. Am J Phys Anthropol 60: 383-400.
52. Ruff CB, Holt B, Trinkaus E,. 2006. Who's afraid of the big bad Wolff? "Wolff's law" and bone functional adaptation. Am J Phys Anthropol 129: 484-498.
53. Ruff CB, Scott WW, Liu A Y-C,. 1991. Articular and diaphyseal remodeling of the proximal femur with changes in body mass in adults. Am J Phys Anthropol 86: 397-413.
54. Ruff CB, Trinkaus E, Holliday TW,. 1997. Body mass and encephalization in Pleistocene Homo. Nature 387: 173-176.
55. Ruff CB, Trinkaus E, Walker A, Larsen CS,. 1993. Postcranial robusticity in Homo. I. Temporal trends and mechanical interpretation. Am J Phys Anthropol 91: 21-53.
56. Ruff CB, Walker A, Trinkaus E,. 1994. Postcranial robusticity in Homo. III. Ontogeny. Am J Phys Anthropol 93: 35-54.
57. Schiessl H, Frost HM, Jee WSS,. 1998. Estrogen and bone-muscle strength and mass relationships. Bone 22: 1-6.
58. Schoenau E, Frost HM,. 2002. The "muscle-bone unit" in children and adolescents. Calcif Tissue Int 70: 405-407.
59. Schoenau E, Neu CM, Beck B, Manz F, Rauch F,. 2002. Bone mineral content per muscle cross-sectional area as an index of the functional muscle-bone unit. J Bone Miner Res 17: 1095-1101.
60. Schoenau E, Neu CM, Mokov E, Wassmer G, Manz F,. 2000. Influence of puberty on muscle area and cortical area of the forearm in boys and girls. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85: 1095-1098.
61. Seeman E,. 2001. Clinical review 137: sexual dimorphism in skeletal size, density, and strength. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86: 4576-4584.
62. Seeman E, Hopper JL, Young NR, Formica C, Goss P, Tsalamandris C,. 1996. Do genetic factors explain associations between muscle strength, lean mass, and bone density? A twin study. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 270: E320-E327.
63. Shaw CN, Stock JT,. 2009. Habitual throwing and swimming corresponds with upper limb diaphyseal strength and shape in modern human athletes. Am J Phys Anthropol 140: 160-172.
64. Sigurdsson G, Aspelund T, Chang M, Jonsdottir B, Sigurdsson S, Eiriksdottir G, Gudmundsson A, Harris TB, Gudnason V, Lang TF,. 2006. Increasing sex difference in bone strength in old age: the age, gene/environment susceptibility-Reykjavik study (AGES-REYKJAVIK). Bone 39: 644-651.
65. Slobodin G, Rozenbaum M, Boulman N, Rosner I,. 2007. Varied presentations of enthesopathy. Semin Arthritis Rheum 37: 119-126.
66. Stock JT, Pfeiffer S,. 2001. Linking structural variability in long bone diaphyses to habitual behaviors: foragers from the Southern African Later Stone Age and the Andaman Islands. Am J Phys Anthropol 115: 337-348.
67. Stock JT, Shaw CN,. 2007. Which measures of diaphyseal robusticity are robust? A comparison of external methods of quantifying the strength of long bone diaphyses to cross-sectional geometric properties. Am J Phys Anthropol 134: 412-423.
68. Sumnik Z, Land C, Coburger S, Neu C, Manz F, Hrach K, Schoenau E,. 2006. The muscle-bone unit in adulthood: influence of sex, height, age and gynecological history on the bone mineral content and muscle cross-sectional area. J Musculoskelet Neuronatal Interact 6: 195-200.
69. Trinkaus E, Churchill SE, Ruff C,. 1994. Postcranial robusticity in Homo. II. Humeral bilateral asymmetry and bone plasticity. Am J Phys Anthropol 93: 1-34.
70. Turner CH, Forwood MR, Rho J-Y, Yoshikawa T,. 1994. Mechanical loading thresholds for lamellar and woven bone formation. J Bone Miner Res 9: 87-97.
71. Villotte S,. 2006. Connaissances médicales actuelles, cotation des enthésopathies: nouvelle méthode. Bull Mém Soc Anthropol Paris 18: 65-85.
72. Villotte S, Castex D, Couallier V, Dutour O, Knüsel C, Henry-Gambier D,. 2010. Enthesopathies as occupational stress markers: evidence from the upper limb. Am J Phys Anthropol 142: 224-234.
73. Weiss E,. 2003a. Effects of rowing on humeral strength. Am J Phys Anthropol 121: 293-302.
74. Weiss E,. 2003b. Understanding muscle markers: aggregation and construct validity. Am J Phys Anthropol 121: 230-240.
75. Weiss E,. 2007. Muscle markers revisited: activity pattern reconstruction with controls in a Central California Amerind population. Am J Phys Anthropol 133: 931-940.
76. Weiss E, Corona L, Schultz B,. 2010. Sex differences in musculoskeletal stress markers: problems with activity pattern reconstructions. Int J Osteoarcheol. DOI: 10.1002/oa.1183.
77. Wescott DJ, Cunningham DL,. 2006. Temporal changes in Arikara humeral and femoral cross-sectional geometry associated with horticultural intensification. J Archeol Sci 33: 1022-1036.
78. Wilczak C,. 1998. Consideration of sexual dimorphism, age, and asymmetry in quantitative measurements of muscle insertion sites. Int J Osteoarcheol 8: 311-325.
79. Zumwalt A, Ruff C, Wilczak C,. 2000. Primate muscle insertions: what does size tell you? Am J Phys Anthropol 30: 331 [abstract].