Remote prognosis after primary cesarean delivery: The association of VBACs and recurrent cesarean deliveries with maternal morbidity

International Journal of Women's Health

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 93-107

  Erez, Offer ^a   Novack, Lena ^b   Kleitman Meir, Vered ^a   Dukler, Doron ^a   Erez Weiss, Idit ^b   Gotsch, Francesca ^c   Mazor, Moshe ^a  

^a BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

^b BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

^c Department of Pathology and Diagnostics Section of Infectious Diseases Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Policlinico GB Rossi   (Italy)

Author keywords

Blood transfusion; Hysterectomy; Parity; Trial of labor; Uterine rupture

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DELIVERY; ENDOMETRITIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HAZARD RATIO; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; INSTRUMENTAL DELIVERY; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; LABOR; MATERNAL MORBIDITY; PARITY; PATIENT CODING; PERINATAL PERIOD; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PRIMARY CESAREAN DELIVERY; PROGNOSIS; PUERPERIUM; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK REDUCTION; SURVIVAL; UTERUS RUPTURE;

EID: 84859084299     PISSN: None     EISSN: 11791411     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2147/ijwh.s29626     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, Ventura SJ, Menacker F, Kirmeyer S. Births: final data for 2004. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2006;55(1):1-101.
2. Bangdiwala SI, Brown SS, Cunningham FG, et al. NIH Consensus Development Conference Draft Statement on Vaginal Birth After Cesarean: New Insights. NIH Consens State Sci Statements. 2010 Mar 10;27(3). [Epub ahead of print.]
3. Menacker F. Trends in cesarean rates for first births and repeat cesarean rates for low-risk women: United States, 1990-2003. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2005;54(4):1-8.
4. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, et al; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics National Vital Statistics System. Births: final data for 2005. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2007;56(6):1-103.
5. Lydon-Rochelle MT, Gardella C, Cárdenas V, Easterling TR. Repeat cesarean delivery: what indications are recorded in the medical chart? Birth. 2006;33(1):4-11.
6. Allen VM, OConnell CM, Baskett TF. Maternal morbidity associated with cesarean delivery without labor compared with induction of labor at term. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(2):286-294.
7. Miller DA, Chollet JA, Goodwin TM. Clinical risk factors for placenta previa-placenta accreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177(1):210-214.
8. Flamm BL, Goings JR, Liu Y, Wolde-Tsadik G. Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: a prospective multicenter study. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;83(6):927-932.
9. Grobman WA, Gilbert S, Landon MB, et al. Outcomes of induction of labor after one prior cesarean. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(2 Pt 1):262-269.
10. McMahon MJ, Luther ER, Bowes WA Jr, Olshan AF. Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section. N Engl J Med. 1996;335(10):689-695.
11. Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, et al; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(25):2581-2589.
12. Endres LK, Barnhart K. Spontaneous second trimester uterine rupture after classical cesarean. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96(5 Pt 2):806-808.
13. Guise JM, McDonagh MS, Osterweil P, Nygren P, Chan BK, Helfand M. Systematic review of the incidence and consequences of uterine rupture in women with previous caesarean section. BMJ. 2004;329(7456):19-25.
14. Wen SW, Rusen ID, Walker M, et al; Maternal Health Study Group, Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System. Comparison of maternal mortality and morbidity between trial of labor and elective cesarean section among women with previous cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(4):1263-1269.
15. ACOG Practice bulletin no. 115: vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(2 Pt 1):450-463.
16. Mercer BM, Gilbert S, Landon MB, et al; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Labor outcomes with increasing number of prior vaginal births after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111(2 Pt 1):285-291.
17. Makoha FW, Felimban HM, Fathuddien MA, Roomi F, Ghabra T. Multiple cesarean section morbidity. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2004;87(3): 227-232.
18. Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ, et al; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(6):1226-1232.
19. Guise JM, Eden K, Emeis C, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2010:1-397.
20. Costantine MM, Fox K, Byers BD, et al. Validation of the prediction model for success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(5):1029-1033.
21. Grobman WA, Lai Y, Landon MB, et al; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network (MFMU). Development of a nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(4):806-812.
22. Grobman WA, Lai Y, Landon MB, et al. Does information available at admission for delivery improve prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean? Am J Perinatol. 2009;26(10):693-701.
23. Grobman WA, Lai Y, Landon MB, et al; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal- Fetal Medicine Units Network. Can a prediction model for vaginal birth after cesarean also predict the probability of morbidity related to a trial of labor? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200(1):56. e1-e6.
24. Peaceman AM, Gersnoviez R, Landon MB, et al; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. The MFMU Cesarean Registry: impact of fetal size on trial of labor success for patients with previous cesarean for dystocia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195(4):1127-1131.
25. Landon MB, Leindecker S, Spong CY, et al; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. The MFMU Cesarean Registry: factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(3 Pt 2):1016-1023.
26. Bujold E, Gauthier RJ. Should we allow a trial of labor after a previous cesarean for dystocia in the second stage of labor? Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98(4):652-655.
27. Bais JM, van der Borden DM, Pel M, et al. Vaginal birth after caesarean section in a population with a low overall caesarean section rate. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2001;96(2):158-162.
28. ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. ACOG practice bulletin. Diagnosis and management of preeclampsia and eclampsia. Number 33, Jan 2002. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;99(1):159-167.
29. White P. Pregnancy complicating diabetes. Am J Med. 1949;7(5): 609-616.
30. Leiberman JR, Fraser D, Weitzman S, Glezerman M. Birthweight curves in southern Israel populations. Isr J Med Sci. 1993;29(4):198-203.