Serial Arguments in Classrooms

Communication Studies

Volumn 62, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 597-617

  Hample, Dale ^a   Krueger, Benjamin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b WINONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Classroom; Climate; Goals; Serial Argument; Tactics

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859076839     PISSN: 10510974     EISSN: 17451035     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10510974.2011.576746     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Berger, C. R. (1997). Planning strategic interaction: Attaining goals through communicative action. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2. Bevan, J. L., Finan, A., & Kaminsky, A. (2008). Modeling serial arguments in close relationships: The serial argument process model. Human Communication Research, 34, 600-624. doi:doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2008.00334.x.
3. Bevan, J. L., Hale, J. L., & Williams, S. L. (2004). Identifying and characterizing goals of dating partners engaging in serial argumentation. Argumentation and Advocacy, 41, 28-40. Retrieved fromhttp://www.americanforensics.org/AA/aa_info.html
4. Bevan, J. L., Tidgewell, K. D., Bagley, K. C., Cusanelli, L., Hartstern, M., Holbeck, D., & Hale, J. L. (2007). Serial argumentation goals and their relationships to perceived resolvability and choice of conflict tactics. Communication Quarterly, 55, 61-77. doi:doi: 10.1080/01463370600998640.
5. Canary, D. J. (2003). Managing interpersonal conflict: A model of events related to strategic choices. In J. O. Greene & B. R. Burleson (Eds.), Handbook of communication and social interaction skills (pp. 515-550). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6. Cramer, D. (2002). Linking conflict management behaviours and relational satisfaction: The intervening role of conflict outcome satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 425-432. doi:doi: 10.1177/0265407502193007.
7. Dillard, J. P. (1990a). A goal-driven model of interpersonal influence. In J. P. Dillard (Ed.), Seeking compliance: The production of interpersonal influence messages (pp. 41-56). Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch Scarisbrick.
8. Dillard, J. P. (1990b). The nature and substance of goals in tactical communication. In M. J. Cody & M. J. McLaughlin (Eds.), The psychology of tactical communication (pp. 70-91). Philadelphia, PA: Multilingual Matters.
9. Dillard, J. P. (2004). The goals-plans-action model of interpersonal influence. In J. S. Seiter & R. H. Gass (Eds.), Perspective on persuasion, social influence, and compliance gaining (pp. 185-206). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
10. Hample, D. (2005). Arguing: Exchanging reasons face to face. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. Hample, D. (2007). Arguments. In D. R. Roskos-Ewoldsen & J. L. Monahan (Eds.), Social cognition (pp. 97-113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12. Hample, D., & Allen, S. (2010, November). Serial arguments in organizations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, San Francisco.
13. Hample, D., & Benoit, P. J. (1999). Must arguments be explicit and violent: A study of naive social actors' understandings. In F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair & C. A. Willard (Eds.), Proceedings of the fourth international conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 306-310). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: SICSAT.
14. Hample, D., Warner, B., & Young, D. (2009). Framing and editing interpersonal arguments. Argumentation, 23, 21-37. doi:doi: 10.1007/s10503-008-9107-x
15. Ingersoll, R. M. (1996). Teachers' decision-making power and school conflict. Sociology of Education, 69, 159-176. doi:doi: 10.2307/2112804.
16. Johnson, K. L., & Roloff, M. E. (1998). Serial arguing and relational quality: Determinants and consequences of perceived resolvability. Communication Research, 25, 327-343. doi:doi: 10.1177/009365098025003004
17. Johnson, K. L., & Roloff, M. E. (2000a). Correlates of the perceived resolvability and relational consequences of serial arguing in dating relationships: Argumentative features and the use of coping strategies. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 676-686. doi:doi: 10.1177/0265407500174011
18. Johnson, K. L., & Roloff, M. E. (2000b). The influence of argumentative role (initiator vs. resistor) on perceptions of serial argument resolvability and relational harm. Argumentation, 14, 1-15. doi:doi: 10.1023/A:1007837310258
19. Kazoleas, D. C. (1995, November). Living with argumentatives: The impact of argumentativeness on issue closure and serial arguments. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association, San Antonio, TX.
20. Keck, K. L., & Samp, J. A. (2007). The dynamic nature of goals and message production as revealed in a sequential analysis of conflict interactions. Human Communication Research, 33, 27-47. doi:doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00287.x
21. Lave, C. A., & March, J. G. (1993). An introduction to models in the social sciences. Lanham, MD: University Press of America. (Original work published 1975)
22. Lewis, R., Romi, S., Qui, X., & Katz, Y. J. (2005). Teachers' classroom discipline and student misbehavior in Australia, China and Israel. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 729-741. doi:doi:10.1016/j.tate.2005.05.008
23. Lloyd, S. A. (1987). Conflict in premarital relationships: Differential perceptions in males and females. Family Relations, 36, 290-294. doi:doi: 10.2307/583542
24. Malis, R. S., & Roloff, M. E. (2006). Demand/withdraw patterns in serial arguments: Implications for well-being. Human Communication Research, 32, 198-216. doi:doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2006.00009.x
25. Martin, R. W., & Scheerhorn, D. R. (1985). What are conversational arguments? Toward a natural language user's perspective. In J. R. Cox, M. O. Sillars & G. B. Walker (Eds.), Argument and social practice (pp. 705-722). Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.
26. Osler, A. (2000). Children's rights, responsibilities and understandings of school discipline. Research Papers in Education, 15, 49-67. doi:doi: 10.1080/026715200362943
27. Rancer, A. S., & Avtgis, T. A. (2006). Argumentative and aggressive communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28. Sillars, A. L. (1980). Attributions and communication in roommate conflicts. Communication Monographs, 47, 180-200. doi:doi: 10.1080/03637758009376031
29. Stevens, J. P. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (), 4th ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
30. Tighe, M. R., Hale, J. L., & Ficara, L. (1995, November). Accounts and attributions of serial arguments in personal relationships. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association, San Antonio, TX.
31. Trapp, R. (1990). Arguments in interpersonal relationships. In R. Trapp & J. Schuetz (Eds.), Perspectives on argumentation: Essays in honor of Wayne Brockriede (pp. 43-54). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.
32. Trapp, R., & Hoff, N. (1985). A model of serial argument in interpersonal relationships. Journal of the American Forensic Association, 22, 1-11. Retrieved fromhttp://www.americanforensics.org/AA/aa_info.html
33. Tulley, M., & Chiu, L. H. (1995). Student teachers and classroom discipline. Journal of Educational Research, 88, 164-171. doi:doi: 10.1080/00220671.1995.9941295
34. Veenman, S. (1984). Perceived problems of beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 54, 143-178. doi:doi: 10.3102/00346543054002143