Modeling serial arguments in close relationships: The serial argument process model

Human Communication Research

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 600-624

  Bevan, Jennifer L ^a   Finan, Andrea ^b   Kaminsky, Allison ^b  

^a CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 54049121768     PISSN: 03603989     EISSN: 14682958     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2008.00334.x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Arbuckle, J. L. (2006). AMOS (Version 7.0) computer program Chicago : SPSS.
2. Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C. Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323 370.
3. Berger, C. R. (1997). Planning strategic interaction: Attaining goals through communicative action. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
4. Bevan, J. L., Hale, J. L. Williams, S. L. (2004). Identifying and characterizing goals of dating partners engaged in serial argumentation. Argumentation and Advocacy, 41, 28 40.
5. Bevan, J. L., Nicol, D. E., Morton, S. E., White, S. K. Hale, J. L. (2006, November). Self versus partner perceived goals in serial arguments. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, San Antonio, TX.
6. Bevan, J. L., Tidgewell, K. D., Bardull, K. C., Cusanelli, L., Hartsern, M., Holbeck, D., et al 2007). Serial argumentation goals and their relationships with perceived resolvability and choice of conflict tactics. Communication Quarterly, 55, 61 77.
7. Brown, R. P. Phillips, A. (2005). Letting bygones be bygones: Further evidence for the validity of the tendency to forgive scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 627 638.
8. Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, application, and programming. Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum.
9. Canary, D. J., Cunningham, E. M. Cody, M. J. (1988). Goal types, gender, and locus of control in managing interpersonal conflict. Communication Research, 15, 426 446.
10. Carson, C. L. Cupach, W. R. (2000). Fueling the flames of the green-eyed monster: The role of ruminative thought in reaction to romantic jealousy. Western Journal of Communication, 64, 308 329.
11. Cloven, D. H. Roloff, M. E. (1991). Sense-making activities and interpersonal conflict: Communicative cures for the mulling blues. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 55, 134 158.
12. Fukushima, O., Ohbuchi, K.-I. Kojima, K. (2006). Multiple goals in interpersonal conflict: Effects of concern for personal resource, evaluative observer, and politeness on verbal responses of resolution strategy. Japanese Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 103 115.
13. Gold, D. B. Wegner, D. M. (1995). Origins of ruminative thought: Trauma, incompleteness, nondisclosure, and suppression. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 1245 1261.
14. Hu, L. Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to unparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424 453.
15. Johnson, K. L. (1998). Serial arguments and relationship quality: An investigation of the antecedents and effects of resolution pessimism in premarital romantic dyads. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University.
16. Johnson, K. L. Roloff, M. E. (1998). Serial arguing and relational quality: Determinants and consequences of perceived resolvability. Communication Research, 25, 327 343.
17. Johnson, K. L. Roloff, M. E. (2000a). Correlates of the perceived resolvability and relational consequences of serial arguing in dating relationships: Argumentative features and the uses of coping strategies. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 676 686.
18. Johnson, K. L. Roloff, M. E. (2000b). The influence of argumentative role (initiator vs. resistor) on perceptions of serial argument resolvability and relational harm. Argumentation, 14, 1 15.
19. Lakey, S. G. Canary, D. J. (2001, July). The role of interpersonal goals in conflict tactic choice. Paper presented at the annual joint meeting of the International Network of Personal Relationships/International Society for the Study of Personal Relationships, Prescott, AZ.
20. Malis, R. S. Roloff, M. E. (2006a). Demand/withdraw patterns in serial arguments: Implications for well-being. Human Communication Research, 32, 198 216.
21. Malis, R. S. Roloff, M. E. (2006b). Features of serial arguing and coping strategies: Links with stress and well-being. In B. A. Le Poire R. M. Dailey (Eds Applied interpersonal communication matters: Family, health, and community relations (pp. 39 66). New York : Peter Lang.
22. Malis, R. S. Roloff, M. E. (2007, May). Communication during serial arguments: Connections with individuals' mental and physical well-being. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, San Francisco, CA.
23. Martin, L. L. Tesser, A. (1989). Toward a motivational and structural theory of ruminative thought. In J. S. Uleman (Ed Unintended thought (pp. 306 326). New York : Guilford.
24. Miller, C. W., Roloff, M. E. Malis, R. S. (2007). Understanding interpersonal conflicts that are difficult to resolve: A review of literature and presentation of an integrated model. In C. S. Beck (Ed Communication yearbook 31 (pp. 118 171). New York : Erlbaum.
25. Ohbuchi, K. Tedeschi, J. T. (1997). Multiple goals and tactical behaviors in social conflicts. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 2177 2200.
26. Robinson-Riegler, G. L. Winton, W. M. (1996). The role of conscious recollection in recognition of affective material: Evidence for positive-negative asymmetry. Journal of General Psychology, 123, 93 104.
27. Scott, V. B. McIntosh, W. D. (1999). The development of a trait measure of ruminative thought. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 1045 1056.
28. Shrout, P. E. Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendation. Psychological Methods, 7, 422 445.
29. Sillars, A. L. (1980). Attributions and communication in roommate conflicts. Communication Monographs, 47, 180 200.
30. Sillars, A. L., Canary, D. J. Tafoya, M. (2003). Communication, conflict, and the quality of family relationships. In A. L. Vangelisti (Ed Handbook of family communication (pp. 413 446). Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum.
31. Tidgewell, K. D. Bevan, J. L. (2007, November). Jealousy targets' rumination as a consequence of partner jealousy expression. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, Chicago.
32. Trapp, R. Hoff, N. (1985). A model of serial argument in interpersonal relationships. Journal of the American Forensic Association, 22, 1 11.