Yoututorial: A framework for assessing instructional online video

Technical Communication Quarterly

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 6-24

  Morain, Matt ^a   Swarts, Jason ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

assessment; instructional video; multimedia; tutorials; YouTube

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859047725     PISSN: 10572252     EISSN: 15427625     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10572252.2012.626690     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Albers, M. J. (2008). Human-information interaction. Proceedings of the 26th Annual ACM Conference on Design of Communication (SIGDOC '08) (pp. 117-123). New York: Association for Computing Machinery. doi:doi:10.1145/1456536.1456560
2. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change: The self in social psychology. Psychological Review, 84 (2), 191-215.
3. Barron, A. E., & Calandra, B. (2003). The use of audio in multimedia learning: Theory and practice. Journal of Interactive Instruction Delivery, 26(1), 25-34.
4. Bishop, M. J., & Cates, W. M. (2001). Theoretical foundations for sound's use in multimedia instruction to enhance learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49 (3), 5-22. doi:doi:10.1007/BF02504912
5. Boom911boom. (2010). [Peer commentary on video "Photoshop: Vivid eyes (interactive tutorial)" by IceflowStudios]. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XRcLNYQV058
6. Carliner, S. (2000). Physical, cognitive, and affective: A three-part framework for information design. Technical Communication, 47, 577-585.
7. Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2008). E-Learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning (), 2nd ed. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
8. Farkas, D. K. (1999). The logical and rhetorical construction of procedural discourse. Technical Communication, 46, 42-54.
9. Gbooy2. (2010). [Peer commentary on video "Photoshop: Vivid eyes (interactive tutorial)" by IceflowStudios]. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XRcLNYQV058
10. Grice, R. A., & Ridgway, L. S. (1993). Usability and hypermedia: Toward a set of usability criteria and measures. Technical Communication, 40, 429-437.
11. Hull, G. A., & Nelson, M. E. (2005). Locating the semiotic power of multimodality. Written Communication, 22, 224-261. doi:doi:10.1177/0741088304274170
12. IceflowStudios. (2010). Photoshop: Vivid eyes (interactive tutorial). Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XRcLNYQV058
13. Khaslavsky, J., & Shedroff, N. (1999). Understanding the seductive experience. Communications of the ACM, 42 (5), 45-49. doi:doi:10.1145/301353.301407
14. Kress, G. (2004). Reading images: Multimodality, representation, and new media. Information Design Journal, 12 (2), 110-119.
15. Lanham, R. A. (2006). The economics of attention: Style and substance in the age of information. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16. Mehlenbacher, B. (2002). Assessing the usability of on-line instructional materials. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 91, 91-98.
17. Palfrey, J., & Gasser, U. (2008). Born digital: Understanding the first generation of digital natives. New York: Basic Books.
18. Redish, J. C. (1993). Understanding readers. In C. M. Barnum & S. Carliner (Eds.), Techniques for technical communicators (pp. 14-41). New York: Macmillan.
19. Schriver, K. A. (1997). Dynamics in document design: Creating text for readers. New York: John Wiley.
20. Selber, S. A. (2004). Multiliteracies for a digital age. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
21. Shedroff, N. (1999). Information interaction design: A unified field theory of design. In R. Jacobson (Eds.), Information Design (pp. 267-292). Cambridge, MA: MIT.
22. Thewaterofthepool. (2010). [Peer commentary on video "Photoshop: Vivid eyes (interactive tutorial)" by IceflowStudios]. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XRcLNYQV058
23. van Der Meij, H., Karreman, J., & Steehouder. M. (2009). Three decades of research and professional practice on printed software tutorials for novices. Technical Communication, 56, 265-292.
24. YouTube. (2011). YouTube press statistics. Retrieved June 30, 2011, from http://www.YouTube.com/t/press_statistics