Subjectivity and sentiment analysis of modern standard Arabi0063

ACL-HLT 2011 - Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies

Volumn 2, Issue , 2011, Pages 587-591

  Abdul Mageed, Muhammad ^a   Diab, Mona T ^b   Korayem, Mohammed ^c  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Columbia University ^*  (United States)

^c INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION TASKS; MODERN STANDARDS; SENTENCE LEVEL; SENTIMENT ANALYSIS; TAGGING SYSTEMS;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

DATA MINING;

EID: 84859045256     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. A. Abbasi, H. Chen, and A. Salem. 2008. Sentiment analysis in multiple languages: Feature selection for opinion classification in web forums. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., 26:1-34.
2. M. Abdul-Mageed. 2008. Online News Sites and Journalism 2.0: Reader Comments on Al Jazeera Arabic. tripleC-Cognition, Communication, Cooperation, 6(2):59.
3. A. Banfield. 1982. Unspeakable Sentences: Narration and Representation in the Language of Fiction. Routledge Kegan Paul, Boston.
4. R. Bruce and J. Wiebe. 1999. Recognizing subjectivity. a case study of manual tagging. Natural Language Engineering, 5(2).
5. T. Joachims. 2008. Svmlight: Support vector machine. http://svmlight. joachims.org/, Cornell University, 2008.
6. S. Kim and E. Hovy. 2004. Determining the sentiment of opinions. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 1367-1373.
7. M. Maamouri, A. Bies, T. Buckwalter, and W. Mekki. 2004. The penn arabic treebank: Building a largescale annotated arabic corpus. In NEMLAR Conference on Arabic Language Resources and Tools, pages 102-109.
8. R. Tsarfaty, D. Seddah, Y. Goldberg, S. Kuebler, Y. Versley, M. Candito, J. Foster, I. Rehbein, and L. Tounsi. 2010. Statistical parsing of morphologically rich languages (spmrl) what, how and whither. In Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 First Workshop on Statistical Parsing of Morphologically-Rich Languages, Los Angeles, CA.
9. J. Wiebe, R. Bruce, and T. O'Hara. 1999. Development and use of a gold standard data set for subjectivity classifications. In Proc. 37th Annual Meeting of the Assoc. for Computational Linguistics (ACL-99), pages 246-253, University of Maryland: ACL.
10. J. Wiebe, T. Wilson, R. Bruce, M. Bell, and M. Martin. 2004. Learning subjective language. Computational linguistics, 30(3):277-308. (Pubitemid 41461901)
11. J. Wiebe. 1994. Tracking point of view in narrative. Computional Linguistics, 20(2):233-287.
12. T. Wilson, J. Wiebe, and P. Hoffmann. 2009. Recognizing Contextual Polarity: an exploration of features for phrase-level sentiment analysis. Computational Linguistics, 35(3):399-433.
13. J. Yi, T. Nasukawa, R. Bunescu, and W. Niblack. 2003. Sentiment analyzer: Extracting sentiments about a given topic using natural language processing techniques. In Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, pages 427-434.
14. H. Yu and V. Hatzivassiloglou. 2003. The penn arabic treebank: Building a large-scale annotated arabic corpus. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 129-136.