Sensor validation for monitoring indoor air quality in a subway station

Indoor and Built Environment

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 205-211

  Liu, Hongbin ^a   Kim, Minjeong ^a   Kang, Onyu ^a   Sankararao, B ^a   Kim, Jeongtai ^a   Kim, Jo Chun ^b   Yoo, Chang Kyoo ^a  

^a Kyung Hee University   (South Korea)

^b Konkuk University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Fault detection and identification; Faulty sensor reconstruction; Indoor air quality; Sensor validation; Subway station; Tele monitoring system

Indexed keywords

AIR POLLUTANT; AIR QUALITY CONTROL; AMBIENT AIR; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS AND RELATED PHENOMENA; INDOOR AIR POLLUTION; MONITORING; ONLINE ANALYSIS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSOR; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 84859019045     PISSN: 1420326X     EISSN: 14230070     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1420326X11419342     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Kosonen R, Tan F. The effect of perceived indoor air quality on productivity loss. Energ Buildings. 2004 ; 36 (10). 981-986
2. Mohammadyan M, Ashmore MR. Personal exposure and indoor PM2.5 concentrations in an urban population. Indoor Built Environ. 2005 ; 14 (3-4). 313-320
3. Nag S, Gupta AK, Mukhopadhyay UK. S distribution of atmospheric aerosols in Kolkata, India and the assessment of pulmonary deposition of particle mass. Indoor Built Environ. 2005 ; 14 (5). 381-389
4. Zhang Y, Zhao B, Li X. Perceived particle intensity: an indicator to evaluate indoor particle pollution. Indoor Built Environ. 2006 ; 15 (2). 155-164
5. Cooke RM, Wilson AM, Tuomisto JT, Morales O, Tainio M, Evans JS. A probabilistic characterization of the relationship between fine particulate matter and mortality: elicitation of european experts. Environ Sci Technol. 2007 ; 41 (18). 6598-6605
6. Aleksandropoulou V, Mitsakou C, Housiadas C, Lazaridis M. Particulate matter exposure and dose relationships derived from realistic exposure scenarios. Indoor Built Environ. 2008 ; 17 (3). 237-246
7. Kim MJ, Rao SB, Kang OY, Kim JT, Yoo CK. Monitoring and prediction of indoor air quality (IAQ) in subway or metro systems using seasonal dependent models. Energ Buildings. 2011 ;:
8. Kwon SB, Cho Y, Park D, Park EY. Study on the indoor air quality of Seoul Metropolitan Subway during the rush hour. Indoor Built Environ. 2008 ; 17 (4). 361-369
9. Kwon SB, Park D, Cho Y, Park EY. Measurement of natural ventilation rate in Seoul Metropolitan Subway cabin. Indoor Built Environ. 2010 ; 19 (3). 366-374
10. Paul T, Sree D, Aglan H. Effect of mechanically induced ventilation on the indoor air quality of building envelopes. Energ Buildings. 2010 ; 42 (3). 326-332
11. Rosen C, Jeppsson U, Rieger L, Vanrolleghem P. Adding realism to simulated sensors and actuators. Water Sci Technol. 2008 ; 57 (3). 337-344
12. Yoo CK, Villez K, Van Hulle SW, Vanrolleghem PA. Enhanced process monitoring for wastewater treatment systems. Environmetrics. 2008 ; 19 (6). 602-617
13. Dunia R, Qin SJ. Joint diagnosis of process and sensor faults using principal component analysis. Control Eng Pract. 1998 ; 6 (4). 457-469
14. Chiang L, Russell E, Braatz R Fault Detection and Diagnosis in Industrial Systems. London: Springer-Verlag ; 2001 :
15. Wang S, Chen Y. Sensor validation and reconstruction for building central chilling systems based on principal component analysis. Energ Convers Manage. 2004 ; 45 (5). 673-695
16. Yoo CK, Villez K, Lee IB, Hulle SV, Vanrolleghem PA. Sensor validation and reconciliation for a partial nitrification process. Water Sci Technol. 2006 ; 53 (4-5). 513-521
17. Chen Y, Lan L. Fault detection, diagnosis and data recovery for a real building heating/cooling billing system. Energ Convers Manage. 2010 ; 51 (5). 1015-1024
18. Uddin MZ, Kim TS, Kim JT. Video-based indoor human gait recognition using depth imaging and hidden markov model: a smart system for smart home. Indoor Built Environ. 2011 ; 20 (1). 120-128
19. Kim MJ, Kim YS, Ataei A, Kim JT, Lim JJ, Yoo CK. Statistical evaluation of indoor air quality changes after installation of the PSD system in Seoul's Metro. Indoor Built Environ. 2011 ; 20 (1). 187-197
20. Jackson J A User's Guide to Principal Components. New York: Wiley ; 1991 :
21. Wise BM, Gallagher NB. The process chemometrics approach to process monitoring and fault detection. J Process Contr. 1996 ; 6 (6). 329-348
22. Dunia R, Qin SJ, Edgar TF, McAvoy TJ. Identification of faulty sensors using principal component analysis. Aiche J. 1996 ; 42 (10). 2797-2812
23. Qin SJ, Yue H, Dunia R. Self-validating inferential sensors with application to air emission monitoring. Ind Eng Chem Res. 1997 ; 36 (5). 1675-1685
24. Qin SJ. Statistical process monitoring: basics and beyond. J Chemometr. 2003 ; 17 (8-9). 480-502
25. Johnson R, Wichern D Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis. 6 th edn Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, Prentice Hall, 2007. New Jersey: Prentice Hall ; 2007 :
26. Qin SJ, Dunia R. Determining the number of principal components for best reconstruction. J Process Contr. 2000 ; 10 (2-3). 245-250
27. Chiang LH, Pell RJ, Seasholtz MB. Exploring process data with the use of robust outlier detection algorithms. J Process Contr. 2003 ; 13 (5). 437-449
28. Fortuna L, Graziani S, Rizzo A, Xibilia M Soft Sensors for Monitoring and Control of Industrial Processes. London: Springer-Verlag ; 2007 :
29. Jolliffe I Principal Component Analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag ; 2002 :
30. Nelson PRC, Taylor PA, MacGregor JF. Missing data methods in PCA and PLS: Score calculations with incomplete observations. Chemometr Intell Lab. 1996 ; 35 (1). 45-65
31. Schafer JL, Graham JW. Missing data: our view of the state of the art. Psychol Methods. 2002 ; 7 (2). 147-177
32. Stanimirova I, Daszykowski M, Walczak B. Dealing with missing values and outliers in principal component analysis. Talanta. 2007 ; 72 (1). 172-178
33. Chen T, Martin E, Montague G. Robust probabilistic PCA with missing data and contribution analysis for outlier detection. Comput Stat Data An. 2009 ; 53 (10). 3706-3716