Exploring process data with the use of robust outlier detection algorithms

Journal of Process Control

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 437-449

  Chiang, Leo H ^a   Pell, Randy J ^a   Seasholtz, Mary Beth ^a  

^a DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY   (United States)

Author keywords

Data preprocessing; Outliers; Process data; Robust statistics; Scaling methods

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; DATA PROCESSING; ONLINE SYSTEMS; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS); SAMPLING; STATISTICAL METHODS;

PROCESS MONITORING;

PROCESS CONTROL;

EID: 0037411806     PISSN: 09591524     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0959-1524(02)00068-9     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. P. Huber, Robust Statistics, Wiley, 1989.
2. Pearson P.K. Exploring process data. J. Process Control. 11:2001;179-194.
3. Davies L., Gather U. The identification of multiple outliers. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 88:1993;782-801.
4. Rousseeuw P.J., Croux C. Alternatives to the median absolute deviation. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 88:1993;1273-1283.
5. Beebe K.R., Pell R.J., Seasholtz M.B. Chemometrics A Practical Guide. 1988;Wiley.
6. Chiang L.H., Russell E.L., Braatz R.D. Fault detection and diagnosis in industrial systems. 2001;Springer-Verlag.
7. MacGregor J.F., Kourti T. Statistical process control of multivariate process. Control Engr. Practice. 3:1995;403-414.
8. Jackson J.E. Quality control methods for several related variables. Technometrics. 1:1959;359-377.
9. Jackson J.E., Mudhlkar G.S. Technometrics. 21:1979;341-349.
10. Helge H., Liang Y., Kvalheim O.M. Trimmed object projections. a nonparametric robust latent-structure decomposition method Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 27:1995;33-40.
11. Hubert M., Rousseeuw P.J., Verboven S. A fast method for robust principal components with applications to chemometrics. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 60:2002;101-111.
12. Li G., Chen Z. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 80:1985;759-766.
13. C. Croux and A. Ruiz-Gazen, in: COMPSTAT: Proceedings in Computational Statistics, 1996. pp. 211-217.
14. Egan W.J., Morgan S.L. Outlier detection in multivariate analytical chemical data. Anal. Chem. 70:1998;2372-2379.
15. Walczak B., Massart D.L. Robust principal components regression as a detection tool for outliers. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 27:1995;41-52.
16. Lyman P.R., Georgakis C. Plant-wide control of the Tennessee Eastman problem. Comp. & Chem. Engr. 19:1995;321-331.
17. Downs J.J., Vogel E.F. A plant-wide industrial-process control problem. Comp. & Chem. Engr. 17:1993;245-255.
18. Ricker N.L. Decentralized control of the Tennessee Eastman problem. J. Process Control. 6:1996;205-221.
19. McAvoy T.J., Ye N. Base control for the Tennessee Eastman problem. Comp. & Chem. Engr. 18:1994;383-413.
20. Valle S., Li W., Qin S.J. Selection of the number of principal components. the variance of the reconstruction error criterion with a comparison to other methods Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 38:1999;4389-4401.