Rapid perceptual learning of noise-vocoded speech requires attention

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Volumn 131, Issue 3, 2012, Pages

  Huyck, Julia Jones ^a   Johnsrude, Ingrid S ^a  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PERCEPTUAL LEARNING; SPEECH SIGNALS; VISUAL DISTRACTORS;

ACOUSTICS;

PHYSICS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; NOISE; PERCEPTION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; NOISE; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84858967105     PISSN: 00014966     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1121/1.3685511     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. A. G. Samuel and T. Kraljic, Perceptual learning for speech., Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 71, 1207-1218 (2009).
2. M. H. Davis and I. S. Johnsrude, Hearing speech sounds: Top-down influences on the interface between audition and speech perception., Hear. Res. 229, 132-157 (2007).
3. M. H. Davis, I. S. Johnsrude, A. Hervais-Adelman, K. Taylor, and C. J. McGettigan, Lexical information drives perceptual learning of distorted speech: Evidence from the comprehension of noise-vocoded sentences., J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 134, 222-241 (2005). (Pubitemid 40687793)
4. A. G. Hervais-Adelman, M. H. Davis, I. S. Johnsrude, K. J. Taylor, and R. P. Carlyon, Generalization of perceptual learning of vocoded speech., J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 37, 283-293 (2011).
5. B. A. Wright, A. T. Sabin, Y. Zhang, N. Marrone, and M. B. Fitzgerald, Enhancing perceptual learning by combining practice with periods of additional sensory stimulation., J. Neurosci. 30, 12868-12877 (2010).
6. A. Seitz, A. Protopapas, Y. Tsushima, E. L. Vlahou, S. Gori, S. Grossberg, and T. Watanabe, Unattended exposure to components of speech sounds yields same benefits as explicit auditory training., Cognition 115, 435-443 (2010).
7. A. Heinrich, R. P. Carlyon, M. H. Davis, and I. S. Johnsrude, The continuity illusion does not depend on attentional state: fMRI evidence from illusory vowels., J. Cogn Neurosci. 23, 2675-2689 (2011).
8. C. Wild, A. Yusuf, D. Wilson, J. Peele, M. Davis, and I. Johnsrude, The neural system supporting the enhancement by attention of the processing of degraded speech, Abstracts of the Proceedings of the 34th Annual Mid-Winter Meeting of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology (2011). (A) (available on-line to ARO members or by e-mailing C. Wild at conorwild@gmail.com).
9. D. D. Greenwood, A cochlear frequency-position function for several species-29 years later., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 87, 2592-2605 (1990). (Pubitemid 20289735)
10. R. V. Shannon, F. G. Zeng, V. Kamath, J. Wygonski, and M. Ekelid, Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues., Science 270, 303-304 (1995).
11. B. R. Glasberg and B. C. J. Moore, A model of loudness applicable to time-varying sounds., J. Audio. Eng. Soc. 50, 331-342 (2002). (Pubitemid 34685140)
12. H. Choi, A. R. Seitz, and T. Watanabe, When attention interrupts learning: inhibitory effects of attention on TIPL., Vision Res. 49, 2586-2590 (2009).