An empirical study on groupware support for software inspection meetings

Proceedings - 18th IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, ASE 2003

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 4-11

  Grünbacher, Paul ^a   Halling, Michael ^a   Biffl, Stefan ^b  

^a JOHANNES KEPLER UNIVERSITY LINZ   (Austria)

^b VIENNA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION; DEFECTS; GROUPWARE;

ACADEMIC ENVIRONMENT; EMPIRICAL STUDIES; FALSE POSITIVE; GROUPWARE TOOLS; PRODUCTS QUALITY; SOFTWARE INSPECTION; TEAM MEMBERS; TOOL SUPPORT;

INSPECTION;

EID: 84858879708     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ASE.2003.1240289     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Basili, V., Green, S., Laitenberger, O., Lanubile, F., Shull, F., Soerumgaard, S., and Zelkowitz, M., The Empirical Investigation of Perspective-Based Reading. Empirical Software Engineering: An International J., 1996. 1(2):133-164.
2. Bianchi, A., Lanubile, F., and Visaggio, G. A Controlled Experiment to Assess the Effectiveness of Inspection Meetings. In: Metrics 01. 2001. London.
3. Biffl, S. and Halling, M. Investigating the influence of inspector capability factors with four inspection techniques on inspection performance. In: 8th IEEE Int. Software Metrics Symposium,. 2002. Ottawa: IEEE Comp. Soc. Press.
4. Biffl, S. and Halling, M., Investigating the Defect Detection Effectiveness and Cost-Benefit of Nominal Inspection Teams. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 2003.
5. Fagan, M., Design and Code Inspections To Reduce Errors In Program Development,. IBM Systems Journal, 1976. 15(3):182-211.
6. Genuchten, M., Cornelissen, W., and Dijk, C., Supporting Inspections With an Electronic Meeting System. JMIS, 1998. 14(3):165-178.
7. Genuchten, M., Dijk, C., Scholten, H., and D., V., Industrial Experience in Using Group Support Systems for Software Inspections. IEEE Software, 2001. 18(3):60-65.
8. Gilb, T. and Graham, D., Software Inspection. 1993: Addison-Wesley.
9. Halling, M., Supporting Management Decisions in the Software Inspection Process. 2002, Vienna University of Technology.
10. Halling, M. and Biffl, S. Using Reading Techniques to Focus Inspection Performance. In: Euromicro 2001 Conference - Software Product and Process Improvement Track. 2001. Warsaw: IEEE Comp. Soc. Press.
11. Halling, M. and Biffl, S., Investigating the Influence of Software Inspection Process Parameters on Inspection Meeting Performance. IEE Proceedings-Software, 2002. 149(5).
12. Halling, M., Biffl, S., and Grünbacher, P. A Groupware-Supported Inspection Process for Active Inspection Management. In: Euromicro 2002 Conference. 2002. Dortmund Germany: IEEE CS.
13. Halling, M., Biffl, S., and Grünbacher, P., An Economic Approach for Improving Requirements Negotiation Models with Inspection. Requirements Engineering Journal, Springer, 2003.
14. Halling, M., Biffl, S., and Grünbacher, P. An Experiment Family to Investigate the Defect Detection Effect of Tool-Support for Requirements Inspection. In: 9th IEEE Int. Software Metrics Symposium. 2003. Sydney: IEEE Comp. Soc. Press.
15. Halling, M., Grünbacher, P., and Biffl, S. Tailoring a COTS Group Support System for Software Requirements Inspection. In: 16th IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering. 2001. San Diego.
16. Höst, M., Regnell, B., and Wohlin, C., Using Students as Subjects - A Comparative Study of Students and Professionals in Lead-Time Impact Assessment,. Empirical Software Engineering, 2000. 5:201-214.
17. Johnson, P.M. and Tjahjono, D. Assessing software review meetings: A controlled experimental study using CSRS. In: ICSE. 1997. Boston.
18. Johnson, P.M. and Tjahjono, D., Does Every Inspection Really Need a Meeting? Empirical Software Engineering, 1998.
19. Laitenberger, O. and DeBaud, J.-M., An encompassing life cycle centric survey of software inspection. Journal of Systems and Software, 2000. 50(1):5-31.
20. Land, L.P.W., Jeffery, R., and Sauer, C. Validating the Defect Detection Performance Advantage of Group Designs for Software Reviews. In: ESEC/FSE. 1997.
21. MacDonald, F. and Miller, J., A Comparison of Computer Support Systems for Software Inspection. Automated Software Engineering, 1999. 6:291-313.
22. Parnas, D.L. and Weiss, D.M. Active design review: principles and practices. In: 8th Int. Conf. on Software Engineering. 1985.
23. Porter, A.A. and Johnson, P.M., Assessing Software Review Meetings: Results of a Comparative Analysis of Two Experimental Studies. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering,, 1997. 23(3).
24. Sauer, C., Jeffery, D., Land, L., and Yetton, P., The Effectiveness of Software Development Technical Reviews: A Behaviorally Motivated Program of Research. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 2000. 26(1):11-14.
25. Tichy, W., Hints for Reviewing Empirical Work in Software Engineering. Empirical Software Engineering: An International Journal, 2001. 5:309-312.
26. Votta, L., Does every Inspection need a Meeting? ACM Software Eng. Notes, 1993. 18(5):107-114.
27. Wohlin, C., Runeson, P., Höst, M., Ohlsson, M.C., Regnell, B., and Wesslén, A., Experimentation in Software Engineering: An Introduction, The Kluwer International Series in Software Engineering. 2000: Kluwer Academic Publishers.