A groupware-supported inspection process for active inspection management

Conference Proceedings of the EUROMICRO

Volumn , Issue , 2002, Pages 251-258

  Halling, Michael ^a   Biffl, Stefan ^b   Grünbacher, Paul ^a  

^a JOHANNES KEPLER UNIVERSITY LINZ   (Austria)

^b VIENNA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTIVE INSPECTIONS; AUTOMATED APPROACH; CONTROLLED EXPERIMENT; DATA COLLECTION; INSPECTION MANAGEMENT; INSPECTION PROCESS; MANUAL INSPECTION; PROCESS ANALYSIS;

EXPERIMENTS; GROUPWARE; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

INSPECTION;

EID: 84889597887     PISSN: 10896503     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/EURMIC.2002.1046168     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Basili V. R; The Experience Factory and its Relationship to other Improvement Paradigms; Software Engineering-ESEC'93, Proceedings, Springer Verlag, pp. 68-83; 1993.
2. Basili V. R. , Green S. , Laitenberger O. , Lanubile F. , Shull F. , Soerumgaard S. , M. Zelkowitz, The Empirical Investigation of Perspective-Based Reading. " Empirical Software Engineering: An International Journal 1, 2 (1996), pp. 133-164.
3. Biffl St. , Halling M. "Software Product Improvement with Inspection", Proc. Euromicro 2000 Conference on Software Product and Process Improvement, Maastricht, IEEE Comp. Soc. Press, Sept. 2000.
4. Biffl St. , Analysis of the Impact of Reading Technique and Inspector Capability on Individual Inspection Performance. Proc. of APSEC 2000 Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference, Singapore, IEEE Comp. Soc. Press, Dec. 2000.
5. Biffl St. , "Using Inspection Data for Defect Estimation. " IEEE Software 17(6); special issue on recent project estimation methods, pp. 36-43, 2000.
6. Biffl St. , Gutjahr W. , "Influence of Team Size and Defect Detection Methods on Inspection Effectiveness", Proc. of IEEE Int. Software Metrics Symposium, London, April 2001.
7. Biffl St. , Grossmann W. (2001) "Evaluating the Accuracy of Objective Estimation Models Based on Inspection Data From Multiple Inspection Cycles", Proc. of ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering, Toronto, Canada, IEEE Comp. Soc. Press, 2001, pp. 145-154.
8. Briand L. , El Emam K. , Freimut B. , and Laitenberger O. , A Comprehensive Evaluation of Capture-Recapture Models for Estimating Software Defect Content", IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 26, no. 6, June 2000, pp. 518-540.
9. Briggs R. O. , de Vreede G.-J. , Nunamaker J. F. , Thinklets: Achieving Predictable Repeatable Patterns of Group Interaction with Group Support Systems (GSS), Proc. HICSS 2001 (Hawaii Int'l Conf. System Sciences), IEEE CS Press, Los Alamitos, California, 2001.
10. El Emam, K. , Laitenberger, O. , and Harbich, T. . The Application of Subjective Estimates of Effectiveness to Controlling Software Inspections. Journal of Systems and Software 54(2), 119-136, 2000.
11. Fagan M. , "Design and Code Inspections To Reduce Errors In Program Development", IBM Systems J. , vol. 15, no. 3, 1976, pp. 182-211.
12. Freimut B. , Laitenberger O. , Biffl St. , "Investigating the Impact of Reading Techniques on the Accuracy of Different Defect Content Estimation Techniques", Proc. of IEEE Int. Software Metrics Symposium, London, April 2001.
13. Gilb T. , Graham D. , Software Inspection, Addison-Wesley, 1993.
14. Halling M. , Grünbacher, P. , Biffl St. , "Groupware Support for Software Requirements Inspection", Proc. of the Workshop on Inspection in Software Engineering (WISE'01), July 2001.
15. Halling M. , Biffl St. Using Reading Techniques to Focus Inspection Performance", Proc. Euromicro 2001 Conference on Software Product and Process Improvement, Warsaw, IEEE Comp. Soc. Press, Sept. 2001.
16. Halling M. , Grünbacher, P. , Biffl St. , "Tailoring a COTS Group Support System for Software Requirements Inspection", Proceedings Automated Software Engineering Conference, IEEE Comp. Soc. Press, San Diego, Dec. 2001.
17. Laitenberger O. , DeBaud J.-M. , "An encompassing life cycle centric survey of software inspection", Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 50, no. 1, 2000, pp. 5-31.
18. MacDonald F. , Miller J. , "A Comparison of Computer Support Systems for Software Inspection", Automated Software Engineering 6, 291-313, 1999.
19. Porter A. and Votta L. , An Experiment to Assess Different Defect Detection Methods for Software Requirements Inspections, Proc. 16th Int. Conf. on Software Engineering, 1994, pp. 103-112.
20. Porter A. and Votta L. , "Comparing Detection Methods for Software Requirements Inspections: a Replicated Experiment using professional subjects", Empirical Software Engineering Journal, vol. 3, no. 4, 1998, pp. 355-379.
21. Regnell, B. , Runeson, P. , and Thelin, T. Are the perspectives really different?-Further experimentation on scenario-based reading of requirements", Empirical Software Engineering, vol. 5, 2000, pp 331-356.
22. Sauer C. , Jeffery D. , Land L. and Yetton P. , "The Effectiveness of Software Development Technical Reviews: A Behaviorally Motivated Program of Research"; IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 26, no. 1, January 2000, pp. 11-14.
23. Travassos G. , Shull F. , Fredericks M. and Basili V. , "Detecting defects in object-oriented designs: Using reading techniques to increase software quality", Proc. Conf. on Object-oriented Programming Systems, Languages & Applications (OOPSLA), 1999.
24. Votta L. , "Does every Inspection need a Meeting?", ACM Software Eng. Notes, vol. 18, no. 5, 1993, pp. 107-114.