Ecological selection and sexual dimorphism in the sooty oystercatcher, Haematopus fuliginosus

Austral Ecology

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 248-257

  Aplin, Lucy Margaret ^a   Cockburn, Andrew ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Foraging; Haematopus fuliginosus; Niche divergence; Oystercatcher; Sexual dimorphism

Indexed keywords

BIOENERGETICS; COASTAL ZONE; DIET; DIVERGENCE; FEEDING ECOLOGY; INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION; INVERTEBRATE; MORPHOLOGY; NATURAL SELECTION; NICHE PARTITIONING; SEXUAL DIMORPHISM; TIDAL CYCLE; WADER;

AUSTRALIA; NEW SOUTH WALES;

ASCIDIACEA; HAEMATOPODIDAE; HAEMATOPUS FULIGINOSUS; PATELLIDAE;

EID: 84858866456     PISSN: 14429985     EISSN: 14429993     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2011.02263.x     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Aplin L. (2009) Ecological hypotheses for evolution of sexual bill dimorphism in shorebirds. Unpublished Honours Thesis, Australian National University.
2. Baker A. (1974) Prey-specific feeding methods of the New Zealand oystercatchers. Notornis 21, 219-33.
3. Banks J. & Paterson A. (2002) Sex roles of the South Island pied oystercatcher Haematopus ostralegus finschi. Notornis 49, 39-44.
4. Bowker G. (1980) Seabird Islands no. 98: Killarney Reef, Victoria. Corella 4, 102-3.
5. Burger J., Marshall A., Howe D., Hahn C. & Chase J. (1977) Effects of tide cycles on habitat selection and habitat partitioning by migrating shorebirds. Auk 94, 743-58.
6. Chafer C. (1993) The foraging ecology of sooty oystercatchers on rocky intertidal shores. Unpublished Honours Thesis, University of Wollongong.
7. Coleman R. & Hockey P. (2008) Effects of an alien invertebrate species and wave action on prey selection by African black oystercatchers (Haematopus moquini). Austral Ecol. 33, 232-40.
8. Considine M. (1979) The feeding behaviour of the sooty oystercatcher (Haematopus fuliginosus) on rocky shores in Victoria. Unpublished Honours Thesis, Monash University.
9. Cristian J. & Castilla J. (2001) Foraging behaviour of the American oystercatcher Haematopus pallitus pitanay on the intertidal ascidian Pyura praeputialis in the Bay of Antofagasta, Chile. J. Ethol. 19, 23-6.
10. Dit Durell S. (2000) Individual feeding specialization in shorebirds: population consequences and conservation implications. Biol. Rev. 75, 503-18.
11. Dit Durell S. & Goss-Custard J. (1993) Sex-related differences in diet and feeding method in the Oystercatcher Haematopus ostralegus. J. Anim. Ecol. 62, 205-15.
12. Elner R., Beninger P., Jackson D. & Potter T. (2005) Evidence of a new feeding mode in western sandpiper (Calidris mauri) and dunlin (Calidris alpina) based on bill and tongue morphology and ultrastructure. Mar. Biol. 14, 1223-34.
13. Fairbairn D. (1997) Allometry for sexual size dimorphism: pattern and process in the co evolution of body size in males and females. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28, 659-87.
14. Fairbairn D. J., Blanckenhorn W. U. & Székely T. (2007) Sex, Size and Gender Roles: Evolutionary Studies of Sexual Size Dimorphism. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
15. Gill F. & Donsker D., eds (2010) IOC World Bird Names (version 2.5). [Cited 14 October 2010.] Available from URL:
16. Goss-Custard J., Cayford J., Boates J. & Dit Durell S. (1989) Field tests of the accuracy of estimating prey size from bill length in oystercatchers, Haematopus ostralegus, eating mussels, Mytilus edulis. Anim. Behav. 35, 1078-83.
17. Gottschaldt K. (1985) Structure and function of avian somatosensory receptors. In: Form and Function in Birds (eds K. Gottschaldt, A. King & J. McLelland ) pp. 375-461. Academic Press, London.
18. Hansen B., Minton C., Jessop R. & Collins P. (2009) Biometrics, sexing criteria, age-structure and moult of sooty oystercatchers in south-eastern and north-western Australia. Emu 109, 25-33.
19. Heg D., Ens B. J., Van Der Jeugd H. & Bruinzeel L. W. (2000) Local dominance and territorial settlement of nonbreeding oystercatchers. Behaviour 137, 474-530.
20. Hockey P. & Underhill L. (1984) Diet of the African black oystercatcher Haematopus moquini on rocky shores: spatial, temporal and sex-related variation. S. Afr. J. Zool. 19, 1-11.
21. Horn H. (1966) Measurement of 'overlap' in comparative ecological studies. Am. Nat. 100, 419.
22. Hulscher J. & Ens B. (1992) Is the bill of the male oystercatcher a better tool for attacking mussels than the bill of the female? Neth. J. Zool. 42, 85-100.
23. Kirkpatrick M. & Ravingé V. (2002) Speciation by natural and sexual selection: models and experiments. Am. Nat. 159, S22-35.
24. Lauro B. & Nol E. (1995) Feeding behavior, prey selection, and bill size of Pied and Sooty oystercatchers in Australia. Wilson Bull. 107, 629-40.
25. Lee N. & Hockey P. (2001) Biases in the field estimation of shorebird prey sizes. J. Field Ornithol. 72, 49-61.
26. Lefebvre L., Nicolakakis N. & Boire D. (2002) Tools and brains in birds. Behaviour 139, 939-73.
27. McKean J. L. (1978) Some remarks on the taxonomy of Australasian oystercatchers, Haematopus spp. Sunbird 9, 3-6.
28. Marchant S. & Higgins P. (1993) Handbook of Australian, New Zealand & Antarctic Birds. Oxford University Press, Auckland.
29. Martin G., Jarrett N. & Williams M. (2007) Visual fields in Blue ducks Hymenolaimus malacorhynchos and Pink-eared ducks Malacorhynchus membranaceus: visual and tactile foraging. Ibis 149, 112-20.
30. Mueller H. (1990) The evolution of reversed sexual dimorphism in size in monogamous species of birds. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 65, 553-85.
31. Nagarajan R., Lea S. & Goss-Custard J. (2002) Mussel valve discrimination and strategies used in valve discrimination by the oystercatcher, Haematopus ostralegus. Funct. Ecol. 16, 339-45.
32. Nebel S. & Elner R. (2005) Functional association of bill morphology and foraging behaviour in calidrid sandpipers. Anim. Biol. 55, 235-43.
33. N.S.W. National Parks and Wildlife Service (1998) Murramarang National Park, Brush Island Nature Reserve, Belowla Island Nature Reserve and Tollgate Islands Nature Reserve:Plan of Management. NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service, Hurstville.
34. Norton-Griffiths M. (1967) Some ecological aspects of the feeding behaviour of the oystercatcher Haematopus ostralegus on the edible mussel Mytilus edulis. Ibis 109, 412-29.
35. Pacheco C. & Castilla J. (2001) Foraging behavior of the American oystercatcher Haematopus palliatus pitanay on the intertidal ascidian Pyura praeputialis in the Bay of Antofagasta, Chile. J. Ethol. 19, 23-6.
36. Radford A. & Du Plessis M. (2003) Bill dimorphism and foraging niche partitioning in the Green woodhoopoe. J. Anim. Ecol. 72, 258-69.
37. Roberts G. (1996) Why individual vigilance declines as group size increases. Anim. Behav. 51, 1077-86.
38. Sandercock B. (2001) What is the relative importance of sexual selection and ecological processes in the evolution of sexual size dimorphism in monogamous shorebirds? Wader Study Group Bull. 96, 64-70.
39. Selander R. (1966) Sexual dimorphism and differential niche utilization in birds. Condor 68, 113-17.
40. Selander R. (1972) Sexual selection and dimorphism in birds. In: Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man (ed. B. Campbell ) pp. 180-230. Aldine Publishing Corporation, Chicago.
41. Shine R. (1989) Ecological causes for the evolution of sexual dimorphism: a review of the evidence. Q. Rev. Biol. 64, 419-61.
42. Swennen C., De Bruijn L., Duiven P., Leopold M. & Marteijn E. (1983) Differences in bill form of the oystercatcher Haematopus ostralegus; A dynamic adaptation to specific foraging techniques. Neth. J. Sea Res. 17, 57-83.
43. Székely T. & Figuerola J. (2000) Sexual size dimorphism in shorebirds, gulls, and alcids: the influence of sexual and natural selection. Evolution 54, 1404-13.
44. Temeles E., Pan I., Brennan J. & Horwitt J. (2000) Evidence for ecological causation for sexual dimorphism in a hummingbird. Science 289, 441-3.
45. Weston M., Ehmke G. & Maguire G. (2009) Manage one beach or two? Movements and space-use of the threatened hooded plover (Thinornis rubricollis) in south-eastern Australia. Wildl. Res. 36, 289-98.
46. Zar J. (1999) Biostatistical Analysis, 4th edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliff.