Quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for mouse models using automatic detection of the arterial input function

NMR in Biomedicine

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 674-684

  Kim, Jae Hun ^a   Im, Geun Ho ^a   Yang, Jehoon ^a   Choi, Dongil ^a   Lee, Won Jae ^a   Lee, Jung Hee ^a  

^a Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Arterial input function; Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI; Kendall's coefficient of concordance; Mouse imaging; Pharmacokinetic model

Indexed keywords

ARTERIAL INPUT FUNCTION; DYNAMIC CONTRAST-ENHANCED MRI; KENDALL'S COEFFICIENT OF CONCORDANCE; MOUSE IMAGING; PHARMACOKINETIC MODEL;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DISEASES; FUNCTION EVALUATION; HEMODYNAMICS; PHARMACOKINETICS; TUMORS;

MAMMALS;

GADOTERATE MEGLUMINE;

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTERIAL INPUT FUNCTION; ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYNAMIC CONTRAST ENHANCED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE DIAGNOSIS; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; VOXEL BASED MORPHOMETRY;

ANIMALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MEGLUMINE; MICE; MICE, INBRED BALB C; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS; OVARIAN NEOPLASMS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

MUS;

EID: 84858864665     PISSN: 09523480     EISSN: 10991492     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nbm.1784     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Brix G, Semmler W, Port R, Schad LR, Layer G, Lorenz WJ. Pharmacokinetic parameters in CNS Gd-DTPA enhanced MR imaging. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 1991; 15(4): 621-628.
2. Ostergaard L, Weisskoff RM, Chesler DA, Gyldensted C, Rosen BR. High resolution measurement of cerebral blood flow using intravascular tracer bolus passages. Part I: Mathematical approach and statistical analysis. Magn. Reson. Med. 1996; 36(5): 715-725.
3. Hoffmann U, Brix G, Knopp MV, Hess T, Lorenz WJ. Pharmacokinetic mapping of the breast: a new method for dynamic MR mammography. Magn. Reson. Med. 1995; 33(4): 506-514.
4. Larsson HB, Stubgaard M, Frederiksen JL, Jensen M, Henriksen O, Paulson OB. Quantitation of blood-brain barrier defect by magnetic resonance imaging and gadolinium-DTPA in patients with multiple sclerosis and brain tumors. Magn. Reson. Med. 1990; 16(1): 117-131.
5. Tofts PS, Kermode AG. Measurement of the blood-brain barrier permeability and leakage space using dynamic MR imaging. 1. Fundamental concepts. Magn. Reson. Med. 1991; 17(2): 357-367.
6. Hillman GG, Singh-Gupta V, Zhang H, Al-Bashir AK, Katkuri Y, Li M, Yunker CK, Patel AD, Abrams J, Haacke EM. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of vascular changes induced by sunitinib in papillary renal cell carcinoma xenograft tumors. Neoplasia 2009; 11(9): 910-920.
7. Garbow JR, Santeford AC, Anderson JR, Engelbach JA, Arbeit JM. Magnetic resonance imaging defines cervicovaginal anatomy, cancer, and VEGF trap antiangiogenic efficacy in estrogen-treated K14-HPV16 transgenic mice. Cancer Res. 2009; 69(20): 7945-7952.
8. Raatschen HJ, Simon GH, Fu Y, Sennino B, Shames DM, Wendland MF, McDonald DM, Brasch RC. Vascular permeability during antiangiogenesis treatment: MR imaging assay results as biomarker for subsequent tumor growth in rats. Radiology 2008; 247(2): 391-399.
9. McGrath DM, Bradley DP, Tessier JL, Lacey T, Taylor CJ, Parker GJ. Comparison of model-based arterial input functions for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in tumor bearing rats. Magn. Reson. Med. 2009; 61(5): 1173-1184.
10. Pickup S, Zhou R, Glickson J. MRI estimation of the arterial input function in mice. Acad. Radiol. 2003; 10(9): 963-968.
11. Pradel C, Siauve N, Bruneteau G, Clement O, de Bazelaire C, Frouin F, Wedge SR, Tessier JL, Robert PH, Frija G, Cuenod CA. Reduced capillary perfusion and permeability in human tumour xenografts treated with the VEGF signalling inhibitor ZD4190: an in vivo assessment using dynamic MR imaging and macromolecular contrast media. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2003; 21(8): 845-851.
12. Thomassin-Naggara I, Bazot M, Darai E, Callard P, Thomassin J, Cuenod CA. Epithelial ovarian tumors: value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and correlation with tumor angiogenesis. Radiology 2008; 248(1): 148-159.
13. Xiong HQ, Herbst R, Faria SC, Scholz C, Davis D, Jackson EF, Madden T, McConkey D, Hicks M, Hess K, Charnsangavej CA, Abbruzzese JL. A phase I surrogate endpoint study of SU6668 in patients with solid tumors. Invest. New Drugs 2004; 22(4): 459-466.
14. Fram EK, Herfkens RJ, Johnson GA, Glover GH, Karis JP, Shimakawa A, Perkins TG, Pelc NJ. Rapid calculation of T1 using variable flip angle gradient refocused imaging. Magn. Reson. Imaging 1987; 5(3): 201-208.
15. Pedersen M, Morkenborg J, Jensen FT, Stodkilde-Jorgensen H, Djurhuus JC, Frokiaer J. In vivo measurements of relaxivities in the rat kidney cortex. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2000; 12(2): 289-296.
16. 99mTc(DTPA) in rats. Magn. Reson. Imaging 1990; 8(5): 567-575.
17. Kendall M, Gibbons JD. Rank Correlation Methods. Oxford University Press: Oxford; 1990.
18. Hansen AE, Pedersen H, Rostrup E, Larsson HB. Partial volume effect (PVE) on the arterial input function (AIF) in T1-weighted perfusion imaging and limitations of the multiplicative rescaling approach. Magn. Reson. Med. 2009; 62(4): 1055-1059.
19. Chan TF, Vese LA. Active contours without edges. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2001; 10(2): 266-277.
20. Cox RW. AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Comput. Biomed. Res. 1996; 29(3): 162-173.
21. Nunes AC, Mathias ML, Crespo AM. Morphological and haematological parameters in the Algerian mouse (Mus spretus) inhabiting an area contaminated with heavy metals. Environ. Pollut. 2001; 113(1): 87-93.
22. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat. Methods Med. Res. 1999; 8(2): 135-160.
23. Zang Y, Jiang T, Lu Y, He Y, Tian L. Regional homogeneity approach to fMRI data analysis. Neuroimage 2004; 22(1): 394-400.
24. He Y, Wang L, Zang Y, Tian L, Zhang X, Li K, Jiang T. Regional coherence changes in the early stages of Alzheimer's disease: a combined structural and resting-state functional MRI study. Neuroimage 2007; 35(2): 488-500.
25. Mouridsen K, Christensen S, Gyldensted L, Ostergaard L. Automatic selection of arterial input function using cluster analysis. Magn. Reson. Med. 2006; 55(3): 524-531.
26. Chen J, Yao J, Thomasson D. Automatic determination of arterial input function for dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in tumor assessment. Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assist. Interv. 2008; 11(Pt 1): 594-601.
27. Murase K, Kikuchi K, Miki H, Shimizu T, Ikezoe J. Determination of arterial input function using fuzzy clustering for quantification of cerebral blood flow with dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MR imaging. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2001; 13(5): 797-806.
28. Carroll TJ, Rowley HA, Haughton VM. Automatic calculation of the arterial input function for cerebral perfusion imaging with MR imaging. Radiology 2003; 227(2): 593-600.