Stakeholder Participation in Management of Invasive Vertebrates

Conservation Biology

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 345-356

  Ford Thompson, Adriana E S ^a,b   Snell, Carolyn ^a   Saunders, Glen ^b   White, Piran C L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^b Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering   (Australia)

Author keywords

Community based conservation; Invasives; Oceania; Participatory conservation

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITY RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; INVASIVE SPECIES; MITIGATION; NATIVE SPECIES; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY; SPECIES CONSERVATION; STAKEHOLDER; VERTEBRATE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; INTRODUCED SPECIES; METHODOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE; VERTEBRATE;

ANIMALS; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; INTRODUCED SPECIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; VERTEBRATES;

AUSTRALIA;

VERTEBRATA;

EID: 84858810564     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: 15231739     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01819.x     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Arnstein, S. R. 1969. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association 35:216-224.
2. Bidwell, R. D., and C. M. Ryan. 2006. Collaborative partnership design: the implications of organizational affiliation for watershed partnerships. Society and Natural Resources 19:827-843.
3. Bonney, R., C. B. Cooper, J. Dickinson, S. Kelling, T. Phillips, K. V. Rosenberg, and J. Shirk. 2009. Citizen science: a developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. BioScience 59:977-984.
4. Braysher, M., and G. Saunders. 2003. PESTPLAN. A guide to setting priorities and developing a management plan for pest animals. Bureau of Rural Sciences, Canberra.
5. Bryman, A. 2008. Social research methods. 3rd edition. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
6. Catt, H., and M. Murphy. 2002. Sub-state nationalism: a comparative analysis of institutional design. Routledge, London.
7. Coglianese, C. 2003. Is satisfaction success? Evaluating public participation in regulatory policymaking. Pages 69-86 in R. O'Leary, and L. B. Bingham, editors. The promise and performance of environmental conflict resolution. Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C.
8. Duram, L. A., and K. G. Brown. 1999. Assessing public participation in U.S. watershed planning initiatives. Society & Natural Resources 12:455-467.
9. Field, S. A., A. J. Tyre, K. H. Thorn, P. J. O'Connor, and H. P. Possingham. 2005. Improving the efficiency in wildlife monitoring by estimating detectability: a case study of foxes (Vulpes vulpes) on the Eyre Peninsula, South Australia. Wildlife Research 32:253-258.
10. Focht, W., and Z. Tractenberg. 2005. A trust- based guide to stakeholder participation. Pages 85-135 in P. A. Sabatier, W. Focht, M. Lubell, Z. Trachtenberg, A. Vedlitz, and M. Matlock, editors. Swimming upstream: collaborative approaches to watershed management. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
11. Forsyth, D. M., R. P. Duncan, M. Bomford, and G. Moore. 2004. Climatic suitability, life-history traits, introduction effort, and the establishment and spread of introduced mammals in Australia. Conservation Biology 18:557-569.
12. Gong, W., J. Sinden, M. Braysher, and R. Jones. 2009. The economic impacts of vertebrate pests in Australia. Invasive Animals Cooperative Research Centre, Canberra.
13. Jackson, L. S. 2001. Contemporary public involvement: toward a strategic approach. Local Environment 6:135-147.
14. Koontz, T. M., T. A. Steelman, J. Carmin, K. Smith Korfmacher, C. Moseley, and C. W. Thomas. 2004. Collaborative environmental management: what roles for government. Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C.
15. Lawrence, A. 2006. 'No personal motive?' Volunteers, biodiversity, and the false dichotomies of participation. Ethics, Place & Environment 9:279-298.
16. Leach, W. D. 2006. Collaborative public management and democracy: evidence from western watershed partnerships. Public Administration Review 66:100-110.
17. Leach, W. D., and N. W. Pelkey. 2001. Making watershed partnerships work: a review of the empirical literature. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 127:378-385.
18. Leach, W. D., and P. A. Sabatier. 2005. Are trust and social capital the keys to success? Watershed partnerships in California and Washington. Pages 233-258 in P. A. Sabatier, W. Focht, M. Lubell, Z. Trachtenberg, A. Vedlitz, and M. Matlock, editors. Swimming upstream: collaborative approaches to watershed management. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
19. Margerum, R. D. 2008. A typology of collaboration efforts in environmental management. Environmental Management 41:487-500.
20. Mascia, M. B., J. P. Brosius, T. A. Dobson, B. C. Forbes, L. Horowitz, M. A. McKean, and N. J. Turner. 2003. Conservation and the social sciences. Conservation Biology 17:649-650.
21. McKinney, M., and P. Field. 2008. Evaluating community-based collaboration on federal lands and resources. Society & Natural Resources 21:419-429.
22. McLeod, R. 2004. Counting the cost: impact of invasive animals in Australia, 2004. Cooperative Research Centre for Pest Animal Control, Canberra.
23. Moore, E. A., and T. M. Koontz. 2003. A typology of collaborative watershed groups: citizen-based, agency-based, and mixed partnerships. Society & Natural Resources 16:451-460.
24. Morgan, L. M. 2001. Community participation in health: perpetual allure, persistent challenge. Health Policy and Planning 16:221-230.
25. Reddiex, B., D. M. Forsyth, E. McDonald-Madden, L. D. Einoder, P. A. Griffioen, R. R. Chick, and A. J. Robley. 2006. Control of pest mammals for biodiversity protection in Australia. I. Patterns of control and monitoring. Wildlife Research 33:691-709.
26. Reed, M. S. 2008. Stakeholder participation in environmental management: a literature review. Biological Conservation 141:2417-2431.
27. White, P. C. L., A. E. S. Ford, M. N. Clout, R. M. Engeman, S. Roy, and G. Saunders. 2008. Alien invasive vertebrates in ecosystems: pattern, process and the social dimension. Wildlife Research 35:171-179.