'Dealing with ambiguity'- The role of obstetricians in gestational diabetes mellitus

Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Volumn 91, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 439-446

  Persson, Margareta ^a   Hörnsten, Åsa ^a   Winkvist, Anna ^b   Mogren, Ingrid ^a  

^a UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Counseling; gestational diabetes mellitus; medical experience; obstetricians; qualitative study

Indexed keywords

GLUCOSE; INSULIN;

ADULT; AGED; AMBIGUITY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONSENSUS; CONTENT ANALYSIS; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; FETUS GROWTH; FRUSTRATION; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; HUMAN; INSULIN TREATMENT; INTERVIEW; JOB SATISFACTION; MACROSOMIA; MALE; MATERNAL WELFARE; MIDWIFE; OBSTETRICIAN; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT COUNSELING; PATIENT SAFETY; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; PHYSICIAN; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREGNANCY DIABETES MELLITUS; PREGNANT WOMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; SWEDEN; WORK EXPERIENCE;

ADULT; AGED; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; DIABETES, GESTATIONAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSTETRICS; PHYSICIAN'S ROLE; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL CARE; SWEDEN; UNCERTAINTY;

EID: 84858780958     PISSN: 00016349     EISSN: 16000412     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01240.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Coustan DR, Lowe LP, Metzger BE, Dyer AR,. The Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) study: paving the way for new diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 202: 654 e1-6.
2. Leary J, Pettitt DJ, Jovanovic L,. Gestational diabetes guidelines in a HAPO world. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010; 24: 673-85.
3. Hadar E, Hod M,. Establishing consensus criteria for the diagnosis of diabetes in pregnancy following the HAPO study. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010; 1205: 88-93.
4. Aberg A, Rydhstroem H, Frid A,. Impaired glucose tolerance associated with adverse pregnancy outcome: a population-based study in southern Sweden. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 184: 77-83. (Pubitemid 32141647)
5. Ostlund I, Hanson U,. Occurrence of gestational diabetes mellitus and the value of different screening indicators for the oral glucose tolerance test. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003; 82: 103-8. (Pubitemid 36349836)
6. Berg M, Adlerberth A, Sultan B, Wennergren M, Wallin G,. Early random capillary glucose level screening and multidisciplinary antenatal teamwork to improve outcome in gestational diabetes mellitus. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007; 86: 283-90.
7. Anderberg E, Kallen K, Berntorp K, Frid A, Aberg A,. A simplified oral glucose tolerance test in pregnancy: compliance and results. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007; 86: 1432-6. (Pubitemid 350135601)
8. Socialstyrelsen [National Board of Health and Welfare]. Nationella riktlinjer för diabetesvården 2010-stöd för styrning och ledning [National guidelines for diabetes care 2010-support for control and management] (in Swedish) 2010.
9. Persson M, Winkvist A, Mogren I,. [No unified guidelines concerning gestational diabetes in Sweden. Noticeable differences between screening, diagnostics and management in maternal health services]. Lakartidningen. 2007; 104: 3365-9.
10. Mödrahälsovård, Sexuell och Reproduktiv Hälsa [Maternal Health Care, Sexual and Reproductive Health] (in Swedish): Svensk Förening för Obstetrik och Gynekologi (SFOG) 2008.
11. Persson M, Hornsten A, Winkvist A, Mogren I,. 'Mission Impossible'? Midwives' experiences counseling pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Patient Educ Couns. 2011; 84: 78-83.
12. Pope C, Campbell R,. Qualitative research in obstetrics and gynaecology. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2001; 108: 233-7. (Pubitemid 32210119)
13. Graneheim UH, Lundman B,. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004; 24: 105-12. (Pubitemid 38232767)
14. Hjelm K, Bard K, Nyberg P, Apelqvist J,. Management of gestational diabetes from the patient's perspective-a comparison of Swedish and Middle-Eastern born women. J Clin Nurs. 2007; 16: 168-78.
15. Hjelm K, Berntorp K, Frid A, Aberg A, Apelqvist J,. Beliefs about health and illness in women managed for gestational diabetes in two organisations. Midwifery. 2008; 24: 168-82.
16. Anderberg E, Berntorp K, Crang-Svalenius E,. Diabetes and pregnancy: women's opinions about the care provided during the childbearing year. Scand J Caring Sci. 2009; 23: 161-70.
17. Berg M, Sparud-Lundin C,. Experiences of professional support during pregnancy and childbirth-a qualitative study of women with type 1 diabetes. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009; 9: 27.
18. Strong C, Anderson G,. The moral status of the near-term fetus. J Med Ethics. 1989; 15: 25-7.
19. Gillon R,. Pregnancy, obstetrics and the moral status of the fetus. J Med Ethics. 1988; 14: 3-4.
20. Reid MC, Gillett G,. The case of Medea-a view of fetal-maternal conflict. J Med Ethics. 1997; 23: 19-25.
21. Fasouliotis SJ, Schenker JG,. Maternal-fetal conflict. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2000; 89: 101-7. (Pubitemid 30103793)
22. Hollander MH, Paarlberg KM, Huisjes AJ,. Gestational diabetes: a review of the current literature and guidelines. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2007; 62: 125-36. (Pubitemid 46146816)
23. Hadar E, Oats J, Hod M,. Towards new diagnostic criteria for diagnosing GDM-the HAPO study. J Perinat Med. 2009; 37: 447-9.
24. HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group. Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2008; 358: 1991-2002.
25. Hälso-och sjukvårdslag [Legislation of health care](in Swedish). 1982:763; Available from:.
26. Kvale S,. Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks: SAGE, 1996.