Maternal-fetal conflict

European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

Volumn 89, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 101-107

  Fasouliotis, Sozos J ^a   Schenker, Joseph G ^a  

^a HADASSAH HEBREW UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

Author keywords

Autonomy; Beneficence; Legal issues; Maternal fetal conflict

Indexed keywords

FETUS OUTCOME; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; LEGAL ASPECT; MATERNAL CARE; MEDICAL ETHICS; PRENATAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRIVACY; REVIEW;

EID: 0033974721     PISSN: 03012115     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0301-2115(99)00166-9     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Manning F.A. Reflections on future directions of perinatal medicine. Semin Perinatol. 13:1989;342-351.
2. Daffos F. Access to the other patient. Semin Perinatol. 13:1989;252.
3. Draper H. Women, forced caesareans and antenatal responsibilities. J Med Ethics. 22:1996;327-333.
4. Ezra Y., Schenker J.G. Maternal-fetal conflicts in pregnancy and labor. Prenatal Neonatal Med. 1:1996;1-10.
5. Kolder V.E.B., Gallagher J., Parsons M.T. Court-ordered obstetrical interventions. N Engl J Med. 316:1987;1192-1196.
6. Steinbock B. The relevance of illegality. Hastings Cent Rep. 22:1992;19-22.
7. Nelson L.J., Buggy B.P., Weil C.J. Forced medical treatment of pregnant women: 'compelling each to live as seems good to the rest'. Hastings Law J. 37:1986;703-710.
8. Reid M.C., Gillett G. The case of Medea - a view of fetal-maternal conflict. J Med Ethics. 23:1997;19-25.
9. Cook R.J., Dickens B.M. Human rights and abortion laws. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 65:1999;81-87.
10. Roe v. Wade. 410 US 113, 1973; 152.
11. Thompson J.J. The right to privacy. Schaeman F.D. Philosophical dimensions of privacy. 1984;284-303 Cambridge University Press, New York.
12. Mahowald M.B. Beyond abortion: refusal of cesarean section. Bioethics. 3:1989;106-121.
13. Goldberg S. Medical choices during pregnancy: whose decision is it anyway? Rutgers Law Rev. 41:1989;591-596.
14. Annas G.J. Protecting the liberty of pregnant patients. N Engl J Med. 316:1987;1213-1214.
15. Cole H.M. Legal interventions during pregnancy: court-ordered medical treatments and legal penalties for potentially harmful behavior by pregnant women. J Am Med Assoc. 264:1990;2663-2670.
16. Mahowald M.B. Maternal-fetal conflict: positions and principles. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 35:1992;729-737.
17. Harrison M.R., Golbus M.S., Filly R.A. The unborn patient. 1984;Grune & Stratton, New York.
18. Fletcher J.C. The fetus as a patient: ethical issues. J Am Med Assoc. 246:1981;772-773.
19. Chervenak F.A., McCullough L.B. Perinatal ethics: a practical method of analysis of obligations to mother and fetus. Obstet Gynecol. 66:1985;442-446.
20. Strong C., Anderson G. The moral status of the near-term fetus. J Med Ethics. 15:1989;25-27.
21. Chervenak F.A., McCullough L.B. Ethical issues in recommending and offering fetal therapy. West J Med. 159:1993;396-399.
22. Schenker J.G. Is there a justification for destroying viable fetuses for medical indications? Harefuah. 131:1996;101-103.
23. Ruddick W., Wilcox W. Operating on the fetus. Hastings Cent Rep. 12:1982;10-14.
24. Chervenak F.A., McCullough L.B. Does obstetric ethics have any role in the obstetrician's response to the abortion controversy? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 163:1990;1425-1429.
25. McCullough L.B., Chervenak F.A. Ethics in obstetrics and gynecology. 1994;Oxford University Press, New York.
26. Chervenak F.A., McCullough L.B. Ethical and legal issues. Scott J.R., Di Saia P.J., Hammond C.B., Spellacy W.N. 8th ed Danforth's obstetrics and gynecology. 1999;939-953 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia.
27. Beauchamp T.L., McCullough L.B. Medical ethics: the moral responsibilities of physicians. 1984;Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
28. Mattingly S.S. The maternal-fetal dyad: exploring the two-patient obstetric model. Hastings Cent Rep. 22:1992;13-18.
29. Harrison M.R. Management of the fetus with a correctable congenital defect. J Am Med Assoc. 246:1981;774-777.
30. Nelson L.J., Milliken N. Compelled medical treatment of pregnant women: life, liberty, and law in conflict. J Am Med Assoc. 259:1988;1060-1066.
31. Engelhardt H.T. Current controversies in obstetrics: wrongful life and forced fetal surgical procedures. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 151:1985;313-318.
32. Schenker J.G., Eisenberg V.H. Ethical issues relating to reproduction control and women's health. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 58:1997;167-176.
33. Chervenak F.A., McCullough L.B. Justified limits on refusing intervention. Hastings Cent Rep. 21:1991;12-16.
34. Nelson L.J. Legal dimensions of maternal-fetal conflict. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 35:1992;738-748.
35. Rodwin M.A. Conflicts in managed care. N Engl J Med. 322:1995;604-607.
36. Bowes W.A., Selfested B. Fetal versus maternal rights: medical and legal perspectives. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 58:1981;209-214.
37. Fasouliotis S.J., Schenker J.G. Cryopreservation of embryos: medical, ethical and legal issues. J Assist Reprod Genet. 13:1996;756-761.
38. Glantz L. Is the fetus a person? A lawyer's view. Bondeson W., Englehardt H.T., Spicker S. Abortion and the status of the fetus. 1983;107-142 D. Reidel, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
39. Chasnoff I., Landress H., Barrett M. The prevalence of illicit-drug and alcohol use during pregnancy and discrepancies in mandatory reporting in Pinellas County, Florida. N Engl J Med. 332:1990;1002-1007.
40. Mathieu D. Preventing prenatal harm. 1991;20 Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
41. In re AC. 573 A2d 1235 DC Ct App, 1990.
42. Myers J.E. Abuse and neglect of the unborn: can the state intervene? Duquesne Law Rev. 23:1984;1-15.
43. Lindgren K. Maternal-fetal conflict: court-ordered cesarean section. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 25:1996;653-656.
44. Macklin R. The inner workings of an ethics committee: latest battle over Jehovah's Witnesses. Hastings Cent Rep. 18:1988;15-20.
45. In re Baby Boy Doe vs. Mother Doe, 632 NE2d 326 (Ill App 1 Dist 1994).
46. Pinkerton J.V., Finnerty J.J. Resolving the clinical and ethical dilemma involved in fetal-maternal conflicts. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 175:1996;289-295.
47. International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, FIGO, Cairo, March 1998.