A test of the relation between working-memory capacity and syntactic Island effects

Language

Volumn 88, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 82-123

  Sprouse, Jon ^a   Wagers, Matt ^b   Phillips, Colin ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Acceptability judgments; Individual differences; Island constraints; Language processing resources; Syntax; Working memory

Indexed keywords

EID: 84858767501     PISSN: 00978507     EISSN: 15350665     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/lan.2012.0004     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Abrusán, Márta. 2011. Presuppositional and negative islands:Asemantic account. Natural Language Semantics 19.257-321.
2. Baayen, R. Harald. 2007. Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Baayen, R. Harald; Douglas J. Davidson; and Douglas M. Bates. 2008. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language 59.390-412.
4. Bard, Ellen Gurman; Dan Robertson; and Antonella Sorace. 1996. Magnitude estimation of linguistic acceptability. Language 72.32-68.
5. Berwick, Robert C., and Amy S.Weinberg. 1984. The grammatical basis of linguistic performance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Braver, Todd S.; Jeremy R. Gray; and Gregory C. Burgess. 2007. Explaining the many varieties of working memory variation: Dual mechanisms of cognitive control. Variation in working memory, ed. by Andrew R. A. Conway, Christopher Jarrold, Michael J. Kane, Akira Miyake, and John N. Towse, 76-106. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. Caplan, David, and Gloria S. Waters. 1999. Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22.77-94.
8. Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Chomsky, Noam. 1973. Conditions on transformations. A festschrift for Morris Halle, ed. By StephenAnderson and Paul Kiparsky, 232-86. New York: Holt, Rinehart, andWinston.
10. Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Conway, Andrew R. A.; Michael J. Kane; Michael F. Bunting; D. Zach Hambrick; Oliver Wilhelm; and Randall W. Engle. 2005. Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user's guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 12.769-86.
12. Cowan, Nelson. 2001. The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24.87-114.
13. Crain, Stephen, and Janet Dean Fodor. 1985. How can grammars help parsers? Natural language parsing: Psycholinguistic, computational, and theoretical perspectives, ed. by David R. Dowty, Lauri Karttunen, and Arnold M. Zwicky, 94-128. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Daneman, Meredyth, and Patriciaa. Carpenter. 1980. Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 19.450-66.
15. Deane, Paul. 1991. Limits to attention: A cognitive theory of island phenomena. Cognitive Linguistics 2.1-63.
16. Edgington, Eugene, and Patrick Onghena. 2007. Randomization tests. 4th edn. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
17. Engdahl, Elisabet. 1983. Parasitic gaps. Linguistic Inquiry 6.5-34.
18. Erteschik-Shir, Nomi. 1973. On the nature of island constraints. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.
19. Fanselow, Gisbert, and Stefan Frisch. 2006. Effects of processing difficulty on judgements of acceptability. Gradience in grammar: Generative perspectives, ed. by Gisbert Fanselow, Caroline Féry, Ralf Vogel, and Matthias Schlesewsky, 291-316. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20. Featherston, Sam. 2005a. Magnitude estimation and what it can do for your syntax: Some WH-constraints in German. Lingua 115.1525-50.
21. Featherston, Sam. 2005b. Universals and grammaticality: WH-constraints in German and English. Linguistics 43.667-711.
22. Fedorenko, Evelina; Edward Gibson; and Douglas Rohde. 2006. The nature of working memory capacity in sentence comprehension: Evidence against domain-specific resources. Journal of Memory and Language 54.541-53.
23. Fedorenko, Evelina; Edward Gibson; and Douglas Rohde. 2007. The nature of working memory in linguistic, arithmetic and spatial integration processes. Journal of Memory and Language 56.246-69.
24. Fodor, Janet D. 1978. Parsing strategies and constraints on transformations. Linguistic Inquiry 9.427-73.
25. Fodor, Janet. D. 1983. Phrase structure parsing and the island constraints. Linguistics and Philosophy 6.163-223.
26. Forster, Kenneth I., and Jonathan C. Forster. 2003. DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods 35.116-24.
27. Gibson, Edward, and James Thomas. 1999. Memory limitations and structural forgetting: The perception of complex ungrammatical sentences as grammatical. Language and Cognitive Processes 14.225-48.
28. Givón, Talmy. 1979. On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press.
29. Goldberg, Adele E. 2007. Constructions at work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30. Hawkins, John A. 1999. Processing complexity and filler-gap dependencies across grammars. Language 75.244-85.
31. Hofmeister, Philip, and Ivan A. Sag. 2010. Cognitive constraints and island effects. Language 86.366-415.
32. Huang, C.-T. James. 1982. Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.
33. Jaeggi, Susanne M.; Martin Buschkuehl; John Jonides; and Walter Perrig. 2008. Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105.6829-33.
34. Jolliffe, Ian T. 2002. Principal component analysis. New York: Springer.
35. Just, Marcel A., and Patricia A. Carpenter. 1992. A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review 98.122-49.
36. Kane, Michael J.; Andrew R. A. Conway; Timothy K. Miura; and Gregory J. H. Colfesh. 2007. Working memory, attention control, and the n-back task: A question of construct validity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 33.615-22.
37. Kane, Michael J., and Randallw. Engle. 2002. The role of prefrontal cortex in workingmemory capacity, executive attention, and general fluid intelligence: An individual differences perspective. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9.637-71.
38. Keller, Frank. 2000. Gradience in grammar: Experimental and computational aspects of degrees of grammaticality. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh dissertation.
39. Keller, Frank. 2003. A psychophysical law for linguistic judgments. Proceedings of the 25th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society, ed. by Richard Alterman and David Kirsh, 652-57. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
40. King, Jonathan, and Marcela. Just. 1991. Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory. Journal of Memory and Language 30.580-602.
41. Kirchner, Wayne K. 1958. Age differences in short-term retention of rapidly changing information. Journal of Experimental Psychology 55.352-58.
42. Kluender, Robert. 1998. On the distinction between strong and weak islands:Aprocessing perspective. Syntax and semantics, vol. 29: The limits of syntax, ed. by Peter Culicover and Louise McNally, 241-79. New York: Academic Press.
43. Kluender, Robert. 2004. Are subject islands subject to a processing account? West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL) 23.101-25.
44. Kluender, Robert, and Marta Kutas. 1993. Subjacency as a processing phenomenon. Language and Cognitive Processes 8.573-633.
45. Kuno, Susumu. 1976. Subject, theme, and the speaker's empathy-A reexamination of relativization phenomena. Subject and topic, ed. by Charles N. Li, 417-44. NewYork:Academic Press.
46. Kuno, Susumu. 1987. Functional syntax: Anaphora, discourse and empathy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
47. Kuno, Susumu, and Ken-Ichi Takami. 1993. Grammar and discourse principles: Functional syntax and GB theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
48. Lasnik, Howard, and Mamuro Saito. 1984. On the nature of proper government. Linguistic Inquiry 15.235-89.
49. Macdonald, Maryellen C.; Marcela. Just; and Patriciaa. Carpenter. 1992.Working memory constraints on the processing of syntactic ambiguity. Cognitive Psychology 24.56-98.
50. Macmillan, Neala., and C. Douglas Creelman. 2004. Detection theory: A user's guide. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
51. Maxwell, Scott E., and Harold D. Delaney. 2003. Designing experiments and analyzing data: A model comparison perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
52. Mccloskey, James. 2002. Resumption, successive cyclicity, and the locality of operations. Derivation and explanation in the minimalist program, ed. by Samuel David Epstein and T. Daniel Seeley, 184-226. Oxford: Blackwell.
53. Mcelree, Brian. 2006. Accessing recent events. The psychology of learning and motivation, vol. 46: Advances in research and theory, ed. by Brian H. Ross, 155-200. San Diego: Academic Press.
54. Mcelree, Brian; Stephani Foraker; and Lisbeth Dyer. 2003. Memory structures that subserve sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language 48.67-91.
55. Pablos, Leticia. 2006. Pre-verbal structure building in Romance languages and Basque. College Park: University of Maryland dissertation.
56. Pearson, Karl. 1901. On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. Philosophical Magazine 6.559-72.
57. Pearl, Lisa, and Jon Sprouse. 2012. Computational models of acquisition for islands. Experimental syntax and island effects, ed. by Jon Sprouse and Norbert Hornstein. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, to appear.
58. Phillips, Colin. 2006. The real-time status of island constraints. Language 82.795-823.
59. Phillips, Colin, and Mattheww. Wagers. 2007. Relating structure and time in linguistics and psycholinguistics. Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics, ed. by Gareth Gaskell, 739-56. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
60. Pritchett, Bradley. 1991. Subjacency in a principle-based parser. Principle-based parsing: Computation and psycholinguistics, ed. by Robert C. Berwick, Steven P. Abney, and Carol Tenney, 301-45. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
61. R DEVELOPMENT CORE TEAM. 2009. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Online: http://www.R-project.org.
62. RIZZI, LUIGI. 1982. Violations of the WH-island constraint and the subjacency condition. Issues in Italian syntax, ed. by Luigi Rizzi, 49-76. Dordrecht: Foris.
63. Roberts, Rose, and Edward Gibson. 2002. Individual differences in working memory. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 31.573-98.
64. Ross, John Robert. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.
65. Sprouse, Jon. 2008. The differential sensitivity of acceptability to processing effects. Linguistic Inquiry 39.686-94.
66. Sprouse, Jon. 2009. Revisiting satiation: Evidence for an equalization response strategy. Linguistic Inquiry 40.329-41.
67. Sprouse, Jon. 2011. A test of the cognitive assumptions of magnitude estimation: Commutativity does not hold for acceptability judgments. Language 87.274-88.
68. Sprouse, Jon; Shin Fukuda; Hajime Ono; and Robert Kluender. 2011. Grammatical operations, parsing processes, and the nature of WH-dependencies in English and Japanese. Syntax 14.179-203.
69. Stevens, Stanley Smith. 1956. The direct estimation of sensory magnitudes: Loudness. The American Journal of Psychology 69.1-25.
70. Stowe, Laurie A. 1986. Parsing WH-constructions: Evidence for on-line gap location. Language and Cognitive Processes 1.227-45.
71. Szabolcsi, Anna, and Marcel Den Dikken. 2006. Strong and weak islands. The Blackwell companion to syntax, ed. by Martin Everaert and Henk van Riemsdijk, 479-532. Somerset, NJ:Wiley-Blackwell.
72. Szabolcsi, Anna, and Frans Zwarts. 1993. Weak islands and an algebraic semantics of scope taking. Natural Language Semantics 1.235-84.
73. Torrego, Esther. 1984. On inversion in Spanish and some of its effects. Linguistic Inquiry 15.103-29.
74. Truswell, Robert. 2007. Extraction from adjuncts and the structure of events. Lingua 117.1355-77.
75. Unsworth, Nash, and Randall W. Engle. 2007. The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: Active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory. Psychological Review 114.104-32.
76. Vasishth, Shravan, and Richard L. Lewis. 2006. Argument-head distance and processing complexity: Explaining both locality and antilocality effects. Language 82.767-94.
77. Vos, Sandra H.; Thomas C. Gunter; Herbert Schriefers; and Angela D. Friederici. 2001. Syntactic parsing and working memory: The effects of syntactic complexity, reading span, and concurrent load. Language and Cognitive Processes 16.65-103.
78. Wagers, Matt. 2012. Memory mechanisms for WH-dependency formation and their implications for islandhood. Experimental syntax and island effects, ed. by Jon Sprouse and Norbert Hornstein. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, to appear.
79. Wagers, Matt; Ellen Frances Lau; and Colin Phillips. 2009. Agreement attraction in comprehension: Representations and processes. Journal of Memory and Language 61.206-37.
80. Wanner, Eric, and Michael Maratsos. 1978. An ATN approach in comprehension. Linguistic theory and psychological reality, ed. byMorris Halle, Joan Bresnan, and George A. Miller, 119-61. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
81. Weskott, Thomas, and Gisbert Fanselow. 2011. On the informativity of different measures of linguistic acceptability. Language 87.249-73.