The differential sensitivity of acceptability judgments to processing effects

Linguistic Inquiry

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 686-694

  Sprouse, Jon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 57349117619     PISSN: 00243892     EISSN: 00243892     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/ling.2008.39.4.686     Document Type: Note

References (14)

1. Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Crain, Stephen, and Janet Fodor. 1985. How can grammars help parsers? In Natural language parsing: Psycholinguistic, computational, and theoretical approaches, ed. by David Dowty, Lauri Karttunen, and Arnold Zwicky, 94-128. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Fanselow, Gisbert, and Stefan Frisch. 2006. Effects of processing difficulty on judgments of acceptability. In Gradience in grammar, ed. by Gisbert Fanselow, Caroline Féry, Mattias Schlesewsky, and Ralf Vogel, 291-316. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Frazier, Lyn, and Giovanni Flores d'Arcais. 1989. Filler driven parsing: A study of gap filling in Dutch. Journal of Memory and Language 28:33.1-344.
5. Garnsey, Susan, Michael Tanenhaus, and Rachel Chapman. 1989. Evoked potentials and the study of sentence comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 18:51-60.
6. Hofmeister, Philip, T. Florian Jaeger, Inbal Arnon, Ivan Sag, and Neal Snider. 2007. Locality and accessibility in wh-questions. In Roots: Linguistics in search of its evidential base, ed. by Sam Featherston and Wolfgang Sternefeld, 185-206. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
7. Keller, Frank, Martin Corley, Steffan Corley, Lars Konieczny, and Amalia Todirascu. 1998. WebExp. Technical report here/ tr-99, Human Communication Research Centre, University of Edinburgh.
8. Kluender, Robert. 1998. On the distinction between strong and weak islands: A processing perspective. In The limits of syntax, ed. by Peter Culicover and Louise McNally, 241-279. Syntax and Semantics 29. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
9. Kluender, Robert. 2004. Are subject islands subject to a processing account? In WCCFL 23, ed. by Angelo J. Rodriguez, Vineeta Chand, Ann Kelleher, and Benjamin Scheiser, 475-499. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
10. Kluender, Robert, and Marta Kutas. 1993. Subjacency as a processing phenomenon. Language and Cognitive Processes 8:573-633.
11. Pickering, Martin, and Michael Traxler. 2003. Evidence against the use of subcategorization frequency in the processing of unbounded dependencies. Language and Cognitive Processes .1.8:469-503.
12. Ross, John Robert. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
13. Stowe, Laurie. 1986. Parsing wh-constructions: Evidence for on-line gap location. Language and Cognitive Processes 1:227-245.
14. Tanenhaus, Michael, Greg Carlson, and John Trueswell. 1989. The role of thematic structures in interpretation and parsing. Language and Cognitive Processes 4:211-234.