Why they quit: A focused look at teachers who leave for other occupations

School Effectiveness and School Improvement

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 371-392

  Cha, Sung Hyun ^a   Cohen Vogel, Lora ^b  

^a Korean Women's Development Institute   (South Korea)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

educational policy; school improvement; structural equation modeling; teacher attrition

Indexed keywords

EID: 84858759599     PISSN: 09243453     EISSN: 17445124     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09243453.2011.587437     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Baker, D.P and Smith, T.M. 1997. Three trends in the condition of education in the United States. Teachers College Record, 99: 12-61.
2. Baron, R.M and Kenny, D.A. 1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51: 1173-1182.
3. Blase, J and Kirby, P. 1992. Bringing out the best in teachers: What effective principals do, Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
4. Boe, E.E, Bobbitt, S.A, Cook, L.H, Whitener, S.D and Weber, A.L. 1997. Why didst thou go? Predictors of retention, transfer, and attrition of special and general education teachers from a national perspective. The Journal of Special Education, 30: 390-411.
5. Brewer, D. 1996. Career paths and quit decisions: Evidence from teaching. Journal of Labor Economics, 14: 313-339.
6. Brown, K.M and Wynn, S.R. 2009. Finding, supporting, and keeping: The role of the principal in teacher retention issues. Leadership & Policy in Schools, 8: 37-63.
7. Byrne, B.M. 1998. Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8. Cappella, E and Weinstein, R.S. 2001. Turning around reading achievement: Predictors of high school students' academic resilience. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93: 758-771.
9. Clift, R.T, Veal, M.L, Holland, P, Johnson, M and McCarthy, J. 1995. Collaborative leadership and shared decision making: Teachers, principals, and university professors, New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
10. Coffman, D.L and MacCallum, R.C. 2005. Using parcels to convert path analysis models into latent variable models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 40: 235-259.
11. Conley, S. 1991. "Review of research on teacher participation in school decision making". In Review of research in education, Edited by: Grant, G. 225-266. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
12. Cooperman, S. 2000, January 26. "The sky is not falling!". In Education Week, 19
13. Cudeck, R and Browne, M.W. 1993. "Alternative ways of assessing model fit". In Testing structural equation models, Edited by: Bollen, K.A and Long, J.S. 1-9. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14. Evans, L. 2001. Delving deeper into morale, job satisfaction and motivation among education professionals: Re-examining the leadership dimension. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 29: 291-306.
15. Evertson, C.M and Weinstein, C.S. 2006. The handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, & contemporary issues, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16. Fan, X, Thompson, B and Wang, L. 1999. Effects of sample size, estimation methods, and model specification on structural equation modeling fit indexes. Structural Equation Modeling, 6: 56-83.
17. Fan, X and Wang, L. 1998. Effects of potential confounding factors on fit indices and parameter estimates for true and misspecified SEM models. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58: 701-735.
18. Fraser, H, Draper, J and Taylor, W. 1998. The quality of teachers' professional lives: Teachers and job satisfaction. Evaluation & Research in Education, 12: 61-71.
19. Grissmer, D.W and Kirby, S.N. 1997. Teacher turnover and teacher quality. Teachers College Record, 99: 45-56.
20. Gritz, R.M and Theobald, N.D. 1996. The effects of school district spending priorities on length of stay in teaching. Journal of Human Resources, 31: 477-512.
21. Gruber, K.J, Wiley, S.D, Broughman, S.P, Strizek, G.A and Burian-Fitzgerald, M. 2002. Schools and staffing survey, 1999-2000: Overview of the data for public, private, public charter, and bureau of indian affairs elementary and secondary schools, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, U.S.
22. Guskey, T.R and Peterson, K.D. 1996. The road to classroom change. Educational Leadership, 53(4): 10-14.
23. Guskey, T.R and Sparks, D. 1991. What to consider when evaluating staff development. Educational Leadership, 49(3): 73-76.
24. Hahs-Vaughn, D.L and Lomax, R.G. 2006. Utilization of sample weights in single-level structural equation modeling. The Journal of Experimental Education, 74: 161-190.
25. Hair, J.F, Anderson, R.E, Tatham, R.L and Black, W.C. 1998. Multivariate data analysis, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
26. Hanushek, E.A, Kain, J.F and Rivkin, S.G. 1999. Do higher salaries buy better teachers? (Working Paper No. 7082), Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
27. Hanushek, E.A, Kain, J.F and Rivkin, S.G. 2004. Why public schools lose teachers?. Journal of Human Resources, 39: 326-354.
28. Hanushek, E.A and Rivkin, S.G. 2007. Pay, working conditions, and teacher quality. The Future of Children, 17(1): 69-86.
29. Harris, D.N and Adams, S.J. 2007. Understanding the level and causes of teacher turnover: A comparison with other professions. Economics of Education Review, 26: 325-337.
30. Hirsch, E, Emerick, S, Church, K and Fuller, E. 2007. Teacher working conditions are student learning conditions: A report on the 2006 North Carolina Teacher Working Conditions Survey, Hillsborough, NC: The Center for Teaching Quality.
31. Hirsch, E, Koppich, J and Knapp, M. 2001. Revisiting what states are doing to improve the quality of teaching: An update on patterns and trends (Working Paper No. Document W-01-1), Seattle, WA: University of Washington.
32. Hoyle, R.H. 1995. Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33. Imazeki, J. 2005. Teacher salaries and teacher attrition. Economics of Education Review, 24: 431-449.
34. Ingersoll, R.M. 2000. "The status of teaching as a profession". In Schools and society: A sociological approach to education (pp, Edited by: Ballentine, J and Spade, J. 106-118. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Press.
35. Ingersoll, R.M. 2001. Teacher turnover, teacher shortages, and the organization of schools (No. Document R-01-1), Seattle, WA: University of Washington.
36. Ingersoll, R.M. 2003. Is there really a teacher shortage?, Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.
37. Ingersoll, R.M, Alsalam, N, Quinn, P and Bobbitt, S. 1997. Teacher professionalization and teacher commitment: A multilevel analysis (No. NCES 97069), Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, U.S.
38. Jacob, B.A and Lefgren, L. 2004. The impact of teacher training on student achievement: Quasi-experimental evidence from school reform efforts in Chicago. The Journal of Human Resources, 39: 50-79.
39. Johnson, S.M and Birkeland, S.E. 2003a. Pursuing a "sense of success": New teachers explain their career decisions. American Educational Research Journal, 40: 581-617.
40. Johnson, S.M and Birkeland, S.E. 2003b. The schools that teachers choose. Educational Leadership, 60(8): 20-24.
41. Jöreskog, K.G and Sörbom, D. 1993. LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language, Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
42. Kelloway, E.K. 1998. Using LISREL for structural equation modeling: A researcher's guide, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
43. Kirby, S.N, Berends, M and Naftel, S. 1999. Supply and demand of minority teachers in Texas: Problems and prospects. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21: 47-66.
44. Kline, R.B. 2005. Principles and practices of structural equation modeling, New York, NY: Guilford Press.
45. Landis, R.S, Beal, D.J and Tesluk, P.E. 2000. A comparison of approaches to forming composite measures in structural equation models. Organizational Research Methods, 3: 186-207.
46. Lankford, H, Loeb, S and Wyckoff, J. 2002. Teacher sorting and the plight of urban schools: A descriptive analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24: 37-62.
47. Loeb, S, Darling-Hammond, L and Luczak, J. 2005. How teaching conditions predict teacher turnover in California schools. Peabody Journal of Education, 80(3): 44-70.
48. Louis, K.S. 1998. Effects of teacher quality of work life in secondary schools on commitment and sense of efficacy. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9: 1-27.
49. Luekens, M.T, Lyter, D.M and Fox, E.E. 2004. Teacher attrition and mobility: Results from the Teacher Follow-up Survey, 2000-01 (NCES 2004-301), Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, U.S.
50. Macdonald, D. 1999. Teacher attrition: A review of literature. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15: 835-848.
51. MacKinnon, D.P, Lockwood, C.M, Hoffman, J.M, West, S.G and Sheets, V. 2002. A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7: 83-104.
52. Miller, D.C and Byrnes, J.P. 2001. To achieve or not to achieve: A self-regulation perspective on adolescents' academic decision making. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93: 677-685.
53. Mont, D and Rees, D.I. 1996. The influence of classroom characteristics on high school teacher turnover. Economic Inquiry, 34: 152-167.
54. Murnane, R.J, Singer, J.D, Willett, J.B, Kemple, J.J and Olsen, R.J. 1991. Who will teach? Policies that matter, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
55. Ostroff, C. 1992. The relationship between satisfaction, attitudes, and performance: An organizational level analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77: 963-974.
56. Perie, M and Baker, D.P. 1997. Job satisfaction among America's teachers: Effects of workplace conditions, background characteristics, and teacher compensation (Statistical Analysis Report No. NCES 97-471), Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, U.S.
57. Reed, D, Rueben, K.S and Barbour, E. 2006. Retention of new teachers in California, San Francisco, CA: Public Policy Institute of California.
58. Rothstein, R. 2002, September 25. Teacher shortages are usually a myth. New York Times,
59. Smith, T.M and Ingersoll, R.M. 2004. What are the effects of induction and mentoring on beginning teacher turnover?. American Educational Research Journal, 41: 681-714.
60. Smith, T.M and Rowley, K.J. 2005. Enhancing commitment or tightening control: The function of teacher professional development in an era of accountability. Educational Policy, 19: 126-154.
61. Stinebrickner, T.R. 1998. An empirical investigation of teacher attrition. Economics of Education Review, 17: 127-136.
62. Stockard, J and Lehman, M.B. 2004. Influences on the satisfaction and retention of 1st-year teachers: The importance of effective school management. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40: 742-771.
63. Strizek, G.A, Pittsonberger, J.L, Riordan, K.E, Lyter, D.M and Orlofsky, G.F. 2006. Characteristics of schools, districts, teachers, principals, and school libraries in the United States: 2003-04 Schools and Staffing Survey (NCES 2006-313 Revised), Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, U.S.
64. Strunk, K.O and Robinson, J.P. 2006. Oh, won't you stay?: A multilevel analysis of the difficulties in retaining qualified teachers. Peabody Journal of Education, 81(4): 65-94.
65. Texas Center for Education Research. 2002. The cost of teacher turnover, Austin, TX: Texas State Board for Educator Certification.
66. Thomas, S.L and Heck, R.H. 2001. Analysis of large-scale secondary data in higher education research: Potential perils associated with complex sampling designs. Research in Higher Education, 42: 517-540.
67. Tomarken, A.J and Waller, N.G. 2005. Structural equation modeling: Strengths, limitations, and misconceptions. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1: 31-65.
68. Weiss, E.M. 1999. Perceived workplace conditions and first-year teachers' morale, career choice commitment, and planned retention: A secondary analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15: 861-879.