Nature–nurture interactions

Social Behaviour: Genes, Ecology and Evolution

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 11-25

  Sokolowski, Marla B ^a   Levine, Joel D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84858753874     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511781360.003     Document Type: Chapter

References (47)

1. Allee, W. C. (1958) The Social Life of Animals. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
2. Bird, A. (2007) Perceptions of epigenetics. Nature, 447, 396–398.
3. Bloch, G. & Robinson, G. E. (2001) Reversal of honeybee behavioral rhythms. Nature, 410,1048.
4. Burkhardt, R. W. (2005) Patterns of Behavior: Konrad Lorenz, Niko Tinbergen, and the Founding of Ethology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
5. Caspi, A., Sugden, K., Moffitt, T. E. et al. (2003) Influence of life stress on depression: moderation by a polymorphism in the 5-HTT gene. Science, 301,386–389.
6. Crabbe, J. C., Wahlsten, D. & Dudek, B. C. (1999) Genetics of mouse behavior: interactions with laboratory environment. Science, 284, 1670–1672.
7. Darwin, C. (1871) The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray.
8. Darwin, C. (1872/1965) The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
9. Falconer, D. S. & Mackay, T. F. C. (1996) Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 4th edn. Harlow: Longman.
10. Fitzpatrick, M. J., Ben Shahar, Y., Smid, H. M. et al. (2005) Candidate genes for behavioural ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 20, 96–104.
11. Ganguly-Fitzgerald, I., Donlea, J. & Shaw, P. J. (2006) Waking experience affects sleep need in Drosophila. Science, 313, 1775–1781.
12. Hensch, T. K. (2005) Critical period plasticity in local cortical circuits. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 877–888.
13. Kaun, K. R., Riedl, C. A. L., Chakaborty-Chatterjee, M. et al. (2007) Natural polymorphism in a cGMP-dependent protein kinase affects food intake and absorption in Drosophila. Journal of Experimental Biology, 210, 3547–3558.
14. Kent, C., Azanchi, R., Smith B., Formosa, A. & Levine J. D. (2008) Social context influences chemical communication in D. melanogaster males. Current Biology, 18,1384–1389.
15. Kent, C. F., Daskalchuk, T., Cook, L., Sokolowski, M. B. & Greenspan, R. J. (2009) The Drosophila foraging gene mediates adult plasticity and gene-environment interactions in behaviour, metabolites, and gene expression in response to food deprivation. PLoS Genetics, 5 (8): e1000609.
16. Krupp J. J., Kent, C., Billeter, J.-C., So, A.-K. et al. (2008) Social experience modifies pheromone expression and mating behaviour in male Drosophila melanogaster. Current Biology, 18, 1373–1383.
17. Kruuk, H. (2003) Niko's Nature: A Life ofNiko Tinbergen and his Science of Animal Behaviour. Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press.
18. Lehrman, D. S. (1953) A critique of Konrad Lorenz's theory of instinctive behavior. Quarterly Review of Biology, 28, 337–363.
19. Lehrman, D. S. (1970) Semantic and conceptual issues in the nature-nurture problem. In: Development and Evolution of Behavior, ed. L. R. Aronson, E. Tobach, D. S. Lehrman & J. S. Rosenblatt. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman, pp. 17–50.
20. Logan, C. A. & Johnston, T. D. (2007) Synthesis and separation in the history of ‘nature' and ‘nurture’. Developmental Psychobiology, 49, 758–769.
21. Lorenz, K. Z. (1981) The Foundations of Ethology. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
22. Meaney, M. J. (2001) Nature, nurture, and the disunity of knowledge. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 935, 50–61.
23. Moore, A. J., Brodie, E. D. & Wolf, J. B. (1997) Interacting phenotypes and the evolutionary process: I. Direct and indirect genetic effects of social interactions. Evolution, 51, 1352–1362.
24. National Center for Biotechnology Information (2004) ESTs: gene discovery made easier. Science Primer. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/About/primer/est.html (accessed 26 October 2009).
25. Osborne, K., Robichon, A., Burgess, E. et al. (1997) Natural behaviour polymorphism due to a cGMP-dependent protein kinase of Drosophila. Science, 277, 834–836.
26. Petfield, D., Chenoweth, S. F., Rundle, H. D. & Blows, M. W. (2005) Genetic variance in female condition predicts indirect genetic variance in male sexual display traits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 102, 6045–6050.
27. Robinson, G. E. (2004) Beyond nature and nurture. Science, 304, 397–399.
28. Robinson, G. E., Grozinger, C. M. & Whitfield, C. W. (2005) Sociogenomics: social life in molecular terms. Nature Reviews Genetics, 6, 257–270.
29. Rutter, M. (2007) Gene-environment interdependence. Developmental Science, 10, 12–18.
30. Sokolowski, M. B. (1980) Foraging strategies of Drosophila melanogaster: a = chromosomal analysis. BehaviourGenetics, 10, 291–302.
31. Sokolowski, M. B. & Wahlsten, D. (2001) Gene-environment interaction and complex behavior. In: Methods in Genomic Neuroscience, ed. S. O. Moldin. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 3–27.
32. Suomi, S. J. (2006) Risk, resilience, and gene x environment interactions in rhesus monkeys. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1094, 83–104.
33. Szyf, M., Weaver, I. C., Champagne, F. A., Diorio, J. & Meaney, M. J. (2005) Maternal programming of steroid receptor expression and phenotype through DNA methylation in the rat. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 26, 139–162.
34. Tinbergen, N. (1951) The Study of Instinct. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35. Toma, D. P., Bloch, G., Moore, D. & Robinson, G. E. (2000) Changes in period mRNA levels in the brain and division of labor in honeybee colonies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 97, 6914–6919.
36. Wahlsten, D. & Gottlieb, G. (1997) The invalid separation of effects of nature and nurture: lessons from animal experimentation. In: Intelligence, Heredity and Environment, ed. R. J. Sternberg & E. Grigorenko. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 163–192.
37. Wahlsten, D., Metten, P., Phillips, T. J. et al. (2003) Different data from different labs: lessons from studies of geneenvironment interaction. Journal of Neurobiology, 54, 283–311.
38. Wahlsten, D., Bachmanov, A., Finn, D. A. & Crabbe, J. C. (2006) Stability of inbred mouse strain differences in behavior and brain size between laboratories and across decades. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 103, 16364–16369.
39. Wang, Y., forda, M., fones, P. L. et al. (2007) Functional CpG methylation system in a social insect. Science, 314, 645–647.
40. Weaver, I. C., Cervoni, N., Champagne, F. A. et al. (2004) Epigenetic programming by maternal behavior. Nature Neuroscience, 7,847–854.
41. Weaver, I. C., Champagne, F. A., Brown, S. E. et al. (2005) Reversal of maternal programming of stress responses in adult offspring through methyl supplementation: altering epigenetic marking later in life. Journal of Neuroscience, 25,11045–11054.
42. Wilson, E. O. (1971) The Insect Societies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43. Wolf, J. B. (2000) Gene interactions from maternal effects. Evolution, 54, 1882–1898.
44. Wolf, J. B. (2003) Genetic architecture and evolutionary constraint when the environment contains genes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 100, 4655–4660.
45. Wolf, J. B., Brodie, E. D., Cheverud, f. M., Moore, A. I. & Wade, M. J. (1998) Evolutionary consequences of indirect genetic effects. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 13, 64–69.
46. Wolf, J. B., Brodie, E. D. & Moore, A. I. (1999) Interacting phenotypes and the evolutionary process II. Selection resulting from social interactions. American Naturalist, 153, 254–266.
47. Wolf, J. B., Vaughn, T. T., Pletscher, L. S. & Cheverud, f. M. (2002) Contribution of maternal effects QTL to genetic architecture of early growth in mice. Heredity, 89, 300–310.