Proteomic analysis of the abomasal mucosal response following infection by the nematode, Haemonchus contortus, in genetically resistant and susceptible sheep

Journal of Proteomics

Volumn 75, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 2141-2152

  Nagaraj, Shivashankar H ^a   Harsha, H C ^b   Reverter, Antonio ^a   Colgrave, Michelle L ^a   Sharma, Rakesh ^b,c   Andronicos, Nicholas ^a   Hunt, Peter ^a   Menzies, Moira ^a   Lees, Michael S ^a   Sekhar, Nirujogi R ^b,d   Pandey, Akhilesh ^e   Ingham, Aaron ^a  

^a CSIRO   (Australia)

^b Institute of Bioinformatics   (India)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH AND NEUROSCIENCES   (India)

^d PONDICHERRY UNIVERSITY   (India)

^e JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Biological networks; Host parasite; ITRAQ; Nematode resistant; Proteomic profiling; Sheep

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE DEAMINASE; AFLATOXIN B1 ALDEHYDE REDUCTASE MEMBER 4 ISOFORM 1; CATHEPSIN X; CHYMOTRYPSIN LIKE ELASTASE FAMILY MEMBER 1; COILED COIL HELIX COILED COIL HELIX DOMAIN CONTAINING 9 PROTEIN; DEXTRO DOPACHROME DECARBOXYLASE; FATTY ACID BINDING PROTEIN; FIBRILLIN 2; GALECTIN 4; GASTROKINE 3; GLUTATHIONE S TRANSFERASE MU 4 ISOFORM 1; GUANINE NUCLEOTIDE BINDING PROTEIN BETA 2; HEMOGLOBIN BETA C; HYDROXYSTEROID(17 BETA)DEHYDROGENASE 4; IMMUNOGLOBULIN V LAMBDA CHAIN; INTERFERON STIMULATED GENE 17; KERATIN; KERATIN TYPE 1 CYTOSKELETAL 20 PROTEIN; MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX CLASS 1 ANTIGEN A; MICROSOMAL TRIGLYCERIDE TRANSFER PROTEIN; ORNITHINE OXOACID AMINOTRANSFERASE; PROTEOME; RAP1A PROTEIN; RAS PROTEIN; RING FINGER PROTEIN; SOMATOSTATIN; TREFOIL FACTOR 2; UBIQUITIN LIKE PROTEIN ISG15; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; UNINDEXED DRUG; VILLIN 1;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE PREDISPOSITION; GENETIC RESISTANCE; HAEMONCHOSIS; HAEMONCHUS CONTORTUS; HOST PARASITE INTERACTION; IMMUNE RESPONSE; NONHUMAN; ONCOGENE RAS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEOMICS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RUMINANT STOMACH; SHEEP; STOMACH MUCOSA;

ANIMALS; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION TO DISEASE; HAEMONCHIASIS; HAEMONCHUS; HOST-PARASITE INTERACTIONS; INTESTINAL MUCOSA; PROTEOME; PROTEOMICS; SHEEP; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

HAEMONCHUS CONTORTUS; LOTUS; NEMATODA; OVIS ARIES;

EID: 84858747463     PISSN: 18743919     EISSN: 18767737     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2012.01.016     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Sackett S.D., Holmes P.H., Abbott K., Jephcott S., Barber M. Assessing the economic cost of endemic disease on the profitability of Australian beef cattle and sheep producers. AHW.087 MLA Final Report 2006.
2. Simpson H.V. Pathophysiology of abomasal parasitism: is the host or parasite responsible?. Vet J 2000, 160:177-191.
3. Balic A., Bowles V.M., Meeusen E.N. The immunobiology of gastrointestinal nematode infections in ruminants. Adv Parasitol 2000, 45:181-241.
4. Windon R.G. Genetic control of resistance to helminths in sheep. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 1996, 54:245-254.
5. Ingham A., Reverter A., Windon R., Hunt P., Menzies M. Gastrointestinal nematode challenge induces some conserved gene expression changes in the gut mucosa of genetically resistant sheep. Int J Parasitol 2008, 38:431-442.
6. Andronicos N., Hunt P., Windon R. Expression of genes in gastrointestinal and lymphatic tissues during parasite infection in sheep genetically resistant or susceptible to Trichostrongylus colubriformis and Haemonchus contortus. Int J Parasitol 2009, 40:417-429.
7. Athanasiadou S., Pemberton A., Jackson F., Inglis N., Miller H.R., Thevenod F., et al. Proteomic approach to identify candidate effector molecules during the in vitro immune exclusion of infective Teladorsagia circumcincta in the abomasum of sheep. Vet Res 2008, 39:58.
8. Goldfinch G.M., Smith W.D., Imrie L., McLean K., Inglis N.F., Pemberton A.D. The proteome of gastric lymph in normal and nematode infected sheep. Proteomics 2008, 8:1909-1918.
9. Lamy E., da Costa G., Santos R., Capela E.S.F., Potes J., Pereira A., et al. Sheep and goat saliva proteome analysis: a useful tool for ingestive behavior research?. Physiol Behav 2009, 98:393-401.
10. Ong S.E., Kratchmarova I., Mann M. Properties of 13C-substituted arginine in stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture (SILAC). J Proteome Res 2003, 2:173-181.
11. Harsha H.C., Molina H., Pandey A. Quantitative proteomics using stable isotope labeling with amino acids in cell culture. Nat Protoc 2008, 3:505-516.
12. Thompson A., Schafer J., Kuhn K., Kienle S., Schwarz J., Schmidt G., et al. Tandem mass tags: a novel quantification strategy for comparative analysis of complex protein mixtures by MS/MS. Anal Chem 2003, 75:1895-1904.
13. Aggarwal K., Choe L.H., Lee K.H. Shotgun proteomics using the iTRAQ isobaric tags. Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic 2006, 5:112-120.
14. Beh K.J., Hulme D.J., Callaghan M.J., Leish Z., Lenane I., Windon R.G., Maddox J.F. A genome scan for quantitative trait loci affecting resistance to Trichostrongylus colubriformis in sheep. Anim Genet 2002, 33:97-106.
15. Xu H., Freitas M.A. MassMatrix: a database search program for rapid characterization of proteins and peptides from tandem mass spectrometry data. Proteomics 2009, 9:1548-1555.
16. Shilov I.V., Seymour S.L., Patel A.A., Loboda A., Tang W.H., Keating S.P., et al. The Paragon Algorithm, a next generation search engine that uses sequence temperature values and feature probabilities to identify peptides from tandem mass spectra. Mol Cell Proteomics 2007, 6:1638-1655.
17. Menzies M., Reverter A., Andronicos N., Hunt P., Windon R., Ingham A. Nematode challenge induces differential expression of oxidant, antioxidant and mucous genes down the longitudinal axis of the sheep gut. Parasite Immunol 2010, 32:36-46.
18. Simon P. Q-Gene: processing quantitative real-time RT-PCR data. Bioinformatics 2003, 19:1439-1440.
19. Menzies M., Ingham A. Identification and expression of Toll-like receptors 1-10 in selected bovine and ovine tissues. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2006, 109:23-30.
20. Benjamini Y.H.Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol 1995, 57:125-133.
21. Keshava Prasad T.S., Goel R., Kandasamy K., Keerthikumar S., Kumar S., Mathivanan S., et al. Human protein reference database - 2009 update. Nucleic Acids Res 2009, 37:D767-D772.
22. Chen G., Gharib T.G., Huang C.C., Taylor J.M., Misek D.E., Kardia S.L., et al. Discordant protein and mRNA expression in lung adenocarcinomas. Mol Cell Proteomics 2002, 1:304-313.
23. Gronborg M., Kristiansen T.Z., Iwahori A., Chang R., Reddy R., Sato N., et al. Biomarker discovery from pancreatic cancer secretome using a differential proteomic approach. Mol Cell Proteomics 2006, 5:157-171.
24. Guo Y., Xiao P., Lei S., Deng F., Xiao G.G., Liu Y., et al. How is mRNA expression predictive for protein expression? A correlation study on human circulating monocytes. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai) 2008, 40:426-436.
25. Shah A.A., Leidinger P., Keller A., Wendschlag A., Backes C., Baus-Loncar M., et al. The intestinal factor Tff3 and a miRNA network regulate murine caloric metabolism. RNA Biol 2011, 8:77-81.
26. Tuomela S., Rautajoki K.J., Moulder R., Nyman T.A., Lahesmaa R. Identification of novel Stat6 regulated proteins in IL-4-treated mouse lymphocytes. Proteomics 2009, 9:1087-1098.
27. Najjar I., Fagard R. STAT1 and pathogens, not a friendly relationship. Biochimie 2010, 92:425-444.
28. Archibald A.L., Cockett N.E., Dalrymple B.P., Faraut T., Kijas J.W., Maddox J.F., et al. The sheep genome reference sequence: a work in progress. Anim Genet 2010, 41:449-453.
29. Gupta N., Benhamida J., Bhargava V., Goodman D., Kain E., Kerman I., et al. Comparative proteogenomics: combining mass spectrometry and comparative genomics to analyze multiple genomes. Genome Res 2008, 18:1133-1142.
30. Kemp J.M., Robinson N.A., Meeusen E.N., Piedrafita D.M. The relationship between the rapid rejection of Haemonchus contortus larvae with cells and mediators in abomasal tissues in immune sheep. Int J Parasitol 2009, 39:1589-1594.
31. Rinaldi M., Dreesen L., Hoorens P.R., Li R.W., Claerebout E., Goddeeris B., et al. Infection with the gastrointestinal nematode Ostertagia ostertagi in cattle affects mucus biosynthesis in the abomasum. Vet Res 2011, 42:61.
32. Lee C.Y., Munyard K.A., Gregg K., Wetherall J.D., Stear M.J., Groth D.M. The influence of MHC and immunoglobulins a and e on host resistance to gastrointestinal nematodes in sheep. J Parasitol Res 2011, 101848.
33. Heinig M., Petretto E., Wallace C., Bottolo L., Rotival M., Lu H., et al. A trans-acting locus regulates an anti-viral expression network and type 1 diabetes risk. Nature 2010, 467:460-464.
34. Fumagalli M., Pozzoli U., Cagliani R., Comi G.P., Bresolin N., Clerici M., et al. The landscape of human genes involved in the immune response to parasitic worms. BMC Evol Biol 2010, 10:264.
35. Oien K.A., McGregor F., Butler S., Ferrier R.K., Downie I., Bryce S., et al. Gastrokine 1 is abundantly and specifically expressed in superficial gastric epithelium, down-regulated in gastric carcinoma, and shows high evolutionary conservation. J Pathol 2004, 203:789-797.
36. Yoshihara T., Kadota Y., Yoshimura Y., Tatano Y., Takeuchi N., Okitsu H., et al. Proteomic alteration in gastic adenocarcinomas from Japanese patients. Mol Cancer 2006, 5:75.
37. Westley B.R., Griffin S.M., May F.E. Interaction between TFF1, a gastric tumor suppressor trefoil protein, and TFIZ1, a brichos domain-containing protein with homology to SP-C. Biochemistry 2005, 44:7967-7975.
38. Taupin D., Podolsky D.K. Trefoil factors: initiators of mucosal healing. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2003, 4:721-732.
39. Ingham A., Menzies M., Hunt P., Reverter A., Windon R., Andronicos N. Divergent ghrelin expression patterns in sheep genetically resistant or susceptible to gastrointestinal nematodes. Vet Parasitol 2011, 181:194-202.
40. Athanasiadou S., Jones L.A., Burgess S.T., Kyriazakis I., Pemberton A.D., Houdijk J.G., et al. Genome-wide transcriptomic analysis of intestinal tissue to assess the impact of nutrition and a secondary nematode challenge in lactating rats. PLoS One 2011, 6:e20771.
41. Wang D., Jensen R., Gendeh G., Williams K., Pallavicini M.G. Proteome and transcriptome analysis of retinoic acid-induced differentiation of human acute promyelocytic leukemia cells, NB4. J Proteome Res 2004, 3:627-635.
42. Hack C.J. Integrated transcriptome and proteome data: the challenges ahead. Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic 2004, 3:212-219.
43. Lorenz P., Ruschpler P., Koczan D., Stiehl P., Thiesen H.J. From transcriptome to proteome: differentially expressed proteins identified in synovial tissue of patients suffering from rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis by an initial screen with a panel of 791 antibodies. Proteomics 2003, 3:991-1002.
44. O'Brien R.N., Shen Z., Tachikawa K., Lee P.A., Briggs S.P. Quantitative proteome analysis of pluripotent cells by iTRAQ mass tagging reveals post-transcriptional regulation of proteins required for ES cell self-renewal. Mol Cell Proteomics 2010, 9:2238-2251.