Early patterns of commercial activity in graphene

Journal of Nanoparticle Research

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2012, Pages

  Shapira, Philip ^a,b   Youtie, Jan ^b   Arora, Sanjay ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Commercialization; Graphene; Publication Patent Nanotechnology transfer

Indexed keywords

ENGINEERING EDUCATION; PATENTS AND INVENTIONS;

APPLICATION SPECIFIC; COMMERCIALIZATION; CONCURRENT MODELING; DIVERSE APPLICATIONS; NANOTECHNOLOGY TRANSFERS; SCIENTIFIC DEVELOPMENT; SCIENTIFIC DISCOVERY; TECHNOLOGICAL IMPROVEMENTS;

GRAPHENE;

GRAPHENE;

ARTICLE; COMMERCIAL PHENOMENA; LABORATORY TEST; PATENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRODUCTIVITY; RESEARCH; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE;

EID: 84858737717     PISSN: 13880764     EISSN: 1572896X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11051-012-0811-y     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Abernathy W, Utterback J (1978) Patterns of industrial innovation. Technol Rev 80(7):40-47
2. Brouwer E, Kleinknecht A (1999) Innovative output, and a firm's propensity to patent: an exploration of CIS micro data. Res Policy 28(6):615-624 (Pubitemid 129563024)
3. Cockburn I, Henderson R, Stern S (1999) The Diffusion of science driven drug discovery: organizational change in pharmaceutical research. NBER Working Paper 7359. Cambridge, MA
4. Cohen SS, Di Minin A, Motoyama Y, Palmberg C (2009) The persistence of home bias for important r&d in wireless telecom and automobiles. Rev Policy Res 26(1/2):55-76. doi:10.1111/j.1541-1338.2008.00369.x
5. Cohen W, Levinthal D (1989) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Adm Sci Q 35(1):128-152
6. Cohen, W, Nelson, R, and Walsh, J (2000) Protecting their intellectual assets: appropriability conditions and why U.S. manufacturing firms patent (or not). NBER Working Paper 7552, Cambridge, MA
7. Edquist C (ed) (1997) Systems of innovation. Technologies, institutions and organizations. Pinter Publisher, London, Washington
8. Grupp H (2000) Learning in a science-driven market: the case of lasers. Ind Corp Change 9(1):143-172
9. Helfat CE, Lieberman MB (2002) The birth of capabilities:market entry and the importance of pre-history. Ind Corp Change 11(4):725-760 (Pubitemid 34990160)
10. Hobday M (2005) Firm-level innovation models: perspectives on research in developed and developing countries. Technol Anal Strat Manag 17(2):121-146 (Pubitemid 40911983)
11. Hoppe H (2000) Second-mover advantages in the strategic adoption of new technology under uncertainty. Int J Ind Organ 18(2):315-338. doi:10.1016/S0167-7187(98)00020-4
12. Hoppe H (2002) The timing of new technology adoption: theoretical models and empirical evidence. Manch Sch 70(1):56-76. doi:10.1111/1467-9957.00283
13. ITRS (2010) International technology roadmap for semiconductors 2010 update overview. http://www.itrs.net/Links/2010ITRS/2010Update/ToPost/2010- Update-Overview.pdf,accessed. Accessed 14 April 2011
14. Katila R, Ahuja G (2002) Something old, something new: a longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Acad Manag J 456:1183-1194 (Pubitemid 36116692)
15. Kogut B, Kulatilaka N (2001) Capabilities as real options. Org Sci 12(6):744-758
16. Lavie D, Stettner U, Tushman ML (2010) Exploration and exploitation within and across organizations. Acad Manag Ann 4:109-155
17. Lieberman MB, Montgomery DB (1988) First-mover advantages. Strategy Manag J 9:41-58
18. Lieberman MB, Montgomery DB (1998) First-mover (dis)advantages: retrospective and link with the resourcebased view. Strategy Manag J 19:1111-1125 (Pubitemid 128468559)
19. Liebowitz SJ, Margolis SE (1995) Are network externalities a new source of market failure? Res Law Econ 7:1-22
20. Lundvall BÁ (ed) (1992) National systems of innovation. Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Pinter Publisher, London
21. Malerba F (2005) Sectoral systems: how and why innovation differs across sectors. In: Fagerberg J, Mowery D, Nelson R (eds) Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford University Press
22. March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Org Sci 2:71-87
23. Mowery D (2011) Nanotechnology and the U.S. national innovation system: continuity and Change. J Technol Transf. doi:10.1007/s10961-011-9210-2
24. Nelson RR, Winter S (1982) An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
25. Nobelprize.org (2011) The Nobel prize in physics 2010. http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel-prizes/physics/laureates/2010/. Accessed 2 Sep 2011
26. Pavitt K (1984) Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory. Res Policy 13(6):343-373. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(84)90018-0
27. Porter ME (1990) The competitive advantage of nations. Free Press, New York
28. Porter AL, Youtie J, Shapira P, Schoeneck D (2008) Refining search terms for nanotechnology. J Nanopart Res 10(5):715-728 (Pubitemid 351579773)
29. Pries F, Guild P (2011) Commercializing inventions resulting from university research: Analyzing the impact of technology characteristics on subsequent business models. Technovation 31(4):151-160. doi:10.1016/j. technovation.2010.05.002
30. Rogers EM (2003) Diffusion of innovations, 5th edn. Free Press, New York
31. Rogers D (2011) Graphene is beginning to revolutionise the market for plastic electronics. Plast Electron 3(6):57-61
32. Rothaermel FT, Alexandre MT (2009) Ambidexterity in technology sourcing: the moderating role of absorptive capacity. Org Sci 20:759-780
33. Schmoch U (2007) Double-boom cycles and the comeback of science-push and market-pull. Res Policy 36(7):1000-1015 (Pubitemid 47361305)
34. Schinwald A, Murphy FA, Jones A, MacNee W, Donaldson K (2012) Graphene-based nanoplatelets: a new risk to the respiratory system as a consequence of their unusual aerodynamic properties. ACS Nano 6(1):736-746. doi:10.1021/nn204229f
35. Segal M (2009) Selling graphene by the ton. Nat Nanotechnol 4:612-614
36. Shapira P, Youtie J, Mohapatra S (2003) Linking research production and development outcomes at the regional level. Res Eval 12(1):105-116 (Pubitemid 38355036)
37. Shapira P, Youtie J, Kay L (2011) National innovation systems and the globalization of nanotechnology innovation. J Technol Transfer. doi:10.1007/s10961-011-9212-0
38. Takeuchi H, Nonaka I (1986) The new product development game. Harvard Bus Rev January-February:137-146
39. Teece DJ (1986) Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Res Policy 15(6):285-305
40. Tuppura A, Hurmelinna-Laukkanen P, Puumalainen K, Jantunen A (2010) The influence of appropriability conditions on the firm's entry timing orientation. J High Technol Manag Res 21:97-107
41. Van Noorden R (2011) Chemistry: the trials of new carbon. Nature 469(7328): 14-16. Nature Publishing Group. doi:10.1038/469014a