Explaining human multiple object tracking as resource-constrained approximate inference in a dynamic probabilistic model

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 22 - Proceedings of the 2009 Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1955-1963

  Vul, Edward ^a   Frank, Michael C ^a   Tenenbaum, Joshua B ^a   Alvarez, George ^b  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; TRACKING (POSITION);

APPROXIMATE INFERENCE; COGNITIVE STRUCTURES; COMPUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; HUMAN FAILURE; HUMAN VISUAL ATTENTION; MULTIPLE OBJECT TRACKING; OBJECT SYSTEMS; OBJECT TRACKING; PROBABILISTIC MODELS; TRACKING MODULE;

UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 84858727555     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. G. Alvarez and S. Franconeri. How many objects can you attentively track?: Evidence for a resource-limited tracking mechanism. Journal of Vision, 7(13):1-10, 2007.
2. P. Bays and M. Husain. Dynamic shifts of limited working memory resources in human vision. Science, 321(5890):851, 2008.
3. E. Blaser, Z. Pylyshyn, and A. Holcombe. Tracking an object through feature space. Nature, 408(6809):196 - 199, 2000.
4. S. Brown and M. Steyvers. Detecting and predicting changes. Cognitive Psychology, 58:49-67, 2008.
5. M. Carrasco and K. Frieder. Cortical magnification neutralizes the eccentricity effect in visual search. Vision Research, 37(1):63-82, 1997.
6. A. Doucet, N. de Freitas, K. Murphy, and S. Russell. Rao-Blackwellised particle filtering for dynamic Bayesian networks. In Proceedings of Uncertainty in AI, volume 00, 2000.
7. J. Feldman and P. Tremoulet. Individuation of visual objects over time. Cognition, 99:131-165, 2006.
8. D. E. Fencsik, J. Urrea, S. S. Place, J. M. Wolfe, and T. S. Horowitz. Velocity cues improve visual search and multiple object tracking. Visual Cognition, 14:92-95, 2006.
9. S. Franconeri, J. Lin, Z. Pylyshyn, B. Fisher, and J. Enns. Evidence against a speed limit in multiple object tracking. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15:802-808, 2008.
10. F. Gustafsson, F. Gunnarsson, N. Bergman, U. Forssell, J. Jansson, R. Karlsson, and P. Nordlund. Particle filters for positioning, navigation, and tracking. In IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, volume 50, 2002.
11. W. James. The Principles of Psychology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1890.
12. R. Kalman. A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. J. of Basic Engineering, 82D:35-45, 1960.
13. B. P. Keane and Z. W. Pylyshyn. Is motion extrapolation employed in multiple object tracking? Tracking as a low-level non-predictive function. Cognitive Psychology, 52:346 - 368, 2006.
14. R. Levy, F. Reali, and T. Griffiths. Modeling the effects of memory on human online sentence processing with particle filters. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 21, 2009.
15. T. Makovski and Y. Jiang. Feature binding in attentive tracking of distinct objects. Visual Cognition, 17:180 - 194, 2009.
16. Z. W. Pylyshyn and R. W. Storm. Tracking multiple independent targets: Evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. Spatial Vision, 3:179-197, 1988.
17. R. Snowden and O. Braddick. The temporal integration and resolution of velocity signals. Vision Research, 31(5):907-914, 1991.
18. R. Streit and Luginbuhl. Probabilistic multi-hypothesis tracking. Technical report 10428, NUWC, Newport, Rhode Island, USA, 1995.
19. S. P. Tripathy and B. T. Barrett. Severe loss of positional information when detecting deviations in multiple trajectories. Journal of Vision, 4(12):1020 - 1043, 2004.