Confounding of norm-based and adaptation effects in brain responses

NeuroImage

Volumn 60, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 2294-2299

  Kahn, David Alexander ^a   Aguirre, Geoffrey Karl ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Category learning; Neural adaptation; Norm based encoding; Prototype effect; Representational similarity

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; BOLD SIGNAL; CONFOUNDING VARIABLE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; INTELLIGENCE; NERVE POTENTIAL; NEUROIMAGING; NEUROSCIENCE; NOTE; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; BRAIN; HUMANS; LEARNING; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL;

EID: 84858721227     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.02.051     Document Type: Note

References (29)

1. Aguirre G.K. Continuous carry-over designs for fMRI. Neuroimage 2007, 35:1480-1494.
2. Aguirre G.K., Zarahn E., D'Esposito M. The variability of human, BOLD hemodynamic responses. Neuroimage 1998, 8:360-369.
3. Aguirre G.K., Mattar M.G., Magis-Weinberg L. de Bruijn cycles for neural decoding. Neuroimage 2011, 56:1293-1300.
4. Barlow H.B. Single units and sensation: A neuron doctrine for perceptual psychology?. Perception 1972, 1:371-394.
5. Davidenko N., Remus D.A., Grill-Spector K. Face likeness and image variability drive responses in human face-selective ventral regions. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2011, (EPub:). 10.1002/hbm.21367.
6. De Baene W., Vogels R. Effects of adaptation on the stimulus selectivity of macaque inferior temporal spiking activity and local field potentials. Cereb. Cortex 2010, 20:2145-2165.
7. DeCarlo L.T., Cross D.V. Sequential effects in magnitude scaling: models and theory. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 1990, 119:375-396.
8. Drucker D.M., Aguirre G. Different spatial scales of shape similarity representation in lateral and ventral LOC. Cereb. Cortex 2009, 19:2269-2280.
9. Edelman S. Representation is representation of similarities. Behav. Brain Sci. 1998, 21(4):449-467. (discussion 467-98).
10. Freeman J.B., Rule N.O., Adams R.B., Ambady N. The neural basis of categorical face perception: graded representations of face gender in fusiform and orbitofrontal cortices. Cereb. Cortex 2010, 20:1314-1322.
11. Furl N., van Rijsbergen N.J., Treves A., Friston K.J., Dolan R.J. Experience-dependent coding of facial expression in superior temporal sulcus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104:13485-13489.
12. Goldstone R. Influences of categorization on perceptual discrimination. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 1994, 123:178-200.
13. Grill-Spector K., Malach R. fMR-adaptation: A tool for studying the functional properties of human cortical neurons. Acta Psychol. 2001, 107:293-321.
14. Harris A., Aguirre G.K. The representation of parts and wholes in face-selective cortex. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2008, 20:863-878.
15. Henson R.N.A., Rugg M.D. Neural response suppression, haemodynamic repetition effects, and behavioural priming. Neuropsychologia 2003, 41:263-270.
16. Jiang X., Rosen E., Zeffiro T., Vanmeter J., Blanz V., Riesenhuber M. Evaluation of a shape-based model of human face discrimination using FMRI and behavioral techniques. Neuron 2006, 50:159-172.
17. Kahn D.A., Harris A.M., Wolk D.A., Aguirre G.K. Temporally distinct neural coding of perceptual similarity and prototype bias. J. Vis. 2010, 10:12.
18. Latinus M., Crabbe F., Belin P. Learning-Induced Changes in the Cerebral Processing of Voice Identity. Cereb. Cortex 2011, (EPub:). 10.1093/cercor/bhr077.
19. Leopold D.A., O'Toole A.J., Vetter T., Blanz V. Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects. Nat. Neurosci. 2001, 4:89-94.
20. Leopold D.A., Bondar I.V., Giese M.A. Norm-based face encoding by single neurons in the monkey inferotemporal cortex. Nature 2006, 442:572-575.
21. Loffler G., Yourganov G., Wilkinson F., Wilson H.R. fMRI evidence for the neural representation of faces. Nat. Neurosci. 2005, 8:1386-1390.
22. Op de Beeck H., Wagemans J., Vogels R. Inferotemporal neurons represent low-dimensional configurations of parameterized shapes. Nat. Neurosci. 2001, 4:1244-1252.
23. Panis S., Wagemans J., Op de Beeck H.P. Dynamic Norm-based Encoding for Unfamiliar Shapes in Human Visual Cortex. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2010, 23:1829-1843.
24. Rhodes G., Jeffery L. Adaptive norm-based coding of facial identity. Vision Res. 2006, 46:2977-2987.
25. Said C.P., Dotsch R., Todorov A. The amygdala and FFA track both social and non-social face dimensions. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:3596-3605.
26. Said C.P., Moore C.D., Norman K.A., Haxby J.V., Todorov A. Graded representations of emotional expressions in the left superior temporal sulcus. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 2010, 4:6.
27. Tversky A. Features of similarity. Psychol. Rev. 1977, 84:327-352.
28. Valentine T. A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A 1991, 43:161-204.
29. Worsley K.J., Friston K.J. Analysis of fMRI Time-Series Revisited - Again. Neuroimage 1995, 2:173-181.