Global patterns in the shape of species geographical ranges reveal range determinants

Journal of Biogeography

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 760-771

  Baselga, Andrés ^a   Lobo, Jorge M ^b   Svenning, Jens Christian ^c   Araújo, Miguel B ^b,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SANTIAGO DE COMPOSTELA   (Spain)

^b MUSEO NACIONAL DE CIENCIAS NATURALES   (Spain)

^c AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ÉVORA   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Climatic envelopes; Dispersal limitation; Macroecology; Neutral theory; Niche determinism; Range shape; Species distribution modelling

Indexed keywords

BIOGEOGRAPHY; CLIMATE CHANGE; DISPERSAL; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION; GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE; MACROECOLOGY; NICHE; RANGE SIZE; SHAPE; TAXONOMY;

EID: 84858700041     PISSN: 03050270     EISSN: 13652699     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2011.02612.x     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Adler, P.B., HilleRisLambers, J. & Levine, J.M. (2007) A niche for neutrality. Ecology Letters, 10, 95-104.
2. Araújo, M.B. & Luoto, M. (2007) The importance of biotic interactions for modelling species distributions under climate change. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 16, 743-753.
3. Araújo, M.B. & Pearson, R.G. (2005) Equilibrium of species' distributions with climate. Ecography, 28, 693-695.
4. Araújo, M.B., Rozenfeld, A., Rahbek, C. & Marquet, P.A. (2011) Using species coexistence networks to assess the impacts of climate change. Ecography, doi:
5. Bailey, R.G. (1996) Ecosystem geography. Springer-Verlag, New York.
6. Baselga, A. & Araújo, M.B. (2009) Individualistic vs community modelling of species distributions under climate change. Ecography, 35, 55-65.
7. Baselga, A. & Araújo, M.B. (2010) Do community-level models describe community variation effectively? Journal of Biogeography, 37, 1842-1850.
8. Brown, J.H. (1995) Macroecology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
9. Brown, J.H. & Maurer, B.A. (1989) Macroecology: the division of food and space among species on continents. Science, 243, 1145-1150.
10. Brown, J.H., Stevens, G.C. & Kaufman, D.M. (1996) The geographic range: size, shape, boundaries, and internal structure. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 27, 597-623.
11. Bullock, J.M., Kenward, R.E. & Hails, R. (eds) (2002) Dispersal ecology. Blackwell Science, Oxford.
12. Busby, J.R. (1991) BIOCLIM - a bioclimate analysis and prediction system. Nature conservation: cost effective biological surveys and data analysis (ed. by C.R. Margules and M.P. Austin ), pp. 64-68. CSIRO, East Melbourne.
13. Cain, S.A. (1944) Foundations of plant geography. Harper & Brothers, New York.
14. Callaway, R.M., Brooker, R.W., Choler, P., Kikvidze, Z., Lortie, C.J., Michalet, R., Paolini, L., Pugnaire, F.I., Newingham, B., Aschehoug, E.T., Armas, C., Kikodze, D. & Cook, B.J. (2002) Positive interactions among alpine plants increase with stress. Nature, 417, 844-848.
15. Canty, A. & Ripley, B. (2008) boot: bootstrap R (S-Plus) functions. R package version 1.2-32. Available at:
16. Case, T.J. & Taper, M.L. (2000) Interspecific competition, environmental gradients, gene flow, and the coevolution of species' borders. The American Naturalist, 155, 583-605.
17. Case, T.J., Holt, R.D., McPeek, M.A. & Keitt, T.H. (2005) The community context of species' borders: ecological and evolutionary perspectives. Oikos, 108, 28-46.
18. Clark Labs (2000) Idrisi 32.02. GIS software package. Clark University, Worcester, MA.
19. Connor, E.F. & Bowers, M.A. (1987) The spatial consequences of interspecific competition. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 24, 213-226.
20. Crawley, M.J. (2007) The R book. Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, UK.
21. Exner, O. & Zvara, K. (1999) Coefficient of determination in some atypical situations: use in chemical correlation analysis. Journal of Physical Organic Chemistry, 12, 151-156.
22. Farber, O. & Kadmon, R. (2003) Assessment of alternative approaches for bioclimatic modeling with special emphasis on the Mahalanobis distance. Ecological Modelling, 160, 115-130.
23. Fløjgaard, C., Normand, S., Skov, F. & Svenning, J.C. (2009) Ice age distributions of European small mammals: insights from species distribution modelling. Journal of Biogeography, 36, 1152-1163.
24. Gravel, D., Canham, C.D., Beaudet, M. & Messier, C. (2006) Reconciling niche and neutrality: the continuum hypothesis. Ecology Letters, 9, 399-409.
25. Hawkins, B.A. & Diniz-Filho, J.A.F. (2006) Beyond Rapoport's rule: evaluating range size patterns of New World birds in a two-dimensional framework. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 15, 461-469.
26. Hawkins, B.A., Field, R., Cornell, H.V., Currie, D.J., Guégan, J.F., Kaufman, D.M., Kerr, J.T., Mittelbach, G.G., Oberdorff, T., O'Brien, E.M., Porter, E.E. & Turner, J.R.G. (2003) Energy, water, and broad-scale geographic patterns of species richness. Ecology, 84, 3105-3117.
27. Hecnar, S.J. (1999) Patterns of turtle species' geographic range size and a test of Rapoport's rule. Ecography, 22, 436-446.
28. Henderson, A., Galeano, G. & Bernal, R. (1995) Field guide to the palms of the Americas. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
29. Hijmans, R.J., Cameron, S.E., Parra, J.L., Jones, P.G. & Jarvis, A. (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology, 25, 1965-1978.
30. Hubbell, S.P. (2001) The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
31. Hutchinson, G.E. (1957) Population studies: animal ecology and demography. Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 22, 415-427.
32. IUCN (2009) IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2009.1. International Union for Conservation of Nature. Available at:
33. Jalas, J. & Suominen, J. (19721996) Atlas Florae Europaeae. The Committee for Mapping the Flora of Europe and Societas Biologica Fennica Vanamo, Helsinki.
34. Jetz, W. & Rahbek, C. (2002) Geographic range size and determinants of avian species richness. Science, 297, 1548-1551.
35. Jiménez-Valverde, A., Peterson, A.T., Soberón, J., Overton, J.M., Aragón, P. & Lobo, J.M. (2011) Use of niche models in invasive species risk assessments. Biological Invasions, doi:
36. Maurer, B.A. (1994) Geographical population analysis: tools for the analysis of biodiversity. Blackwell Science, Oxford.
37. McInnes, L., Purvis, A. & Orme, C.D.L. (2009) Where do species' geographic ranges stop and why? Landscape impermeability and the Afrotropical avifauna. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 276, 3063-3070.
38. Mitchell-Jones, A.J., Amori, G., Bogdanowicz, W., Krystufek, B., Reijnders, P.J.H., Spitzenberger, E., Stubbe, M., Thissen, J.B.M., Vohralik, V. & Zima, J. (1999) The atlas of European mammals. Poyser, London.
39. Nogués-Bravo, D., Rodríguez, J., Hortal, J., Batra, P. & Araújo, M.B. (2008) Climate change, humans, and the extinction of the woolly mammoth. PLoS Biology, 6, 685-692.
40. Normand, S., Treier, U.A., Randin, C., Vittoz, P., Guisan, A. & Svenning, J.C. (2009) Importance of abiotic stress as a range-limit determinant for European plants: insights from species responses to climatic gradients. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 18, 437-449.
41. Ohlemüller, R., Anderson, B.J., Araújo, M.B., Butchart, S.H.M., Kudrna, O., Ridgely, R.S. & Thomas, C.D. (2008) The coincidence of climatic and species rarity: high risk to small-range species from climate change. Biology Letters, 4, 568-572.
42. Paul, J.R., Morton, C., Taylor, C.M. & Tonsor, S.J. (2009) Evolutionary time for dispersal limits the extent but not the occupancy of species' potential ranges in the tropical plant genus Psychotria (Rubiaceae). The American Naturalist, 173, 188-199.
43. Pfrender, M.E., Bradshaw, W.E. & Kleckner, C.A. (1998) Patterns in the geographical range sizes of ectotherms in North America. Oecologia, 115, 439-444.
44. Pigot, A.L., Owens, I.P.F. & Orme, C.D.L. (2010) The environmental limits to geographic range expansion in birds. Ecology Letters, 13, 705-715.
45. Price, T.D. & Kirkpatrick, M. (2009) Evolutionarily stable range limits set by interspecific competition. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 276, 1429-1434.
46. R Development Core Team (2006) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at:
47. Rapoport, E.H. (1975) Areografía: estrategias geográficas de las especies. Fondo de Cultura Económica, México D.F.
48. Ridgely, R.S., Allnutt, T.F., Brooks, T., McNicol, D.K., Mehlman, D.W., Young, B.E. & Zook, J.R. (2007) Digital distribution maps of the birds of the Western Hemisphere. Version 3.0. NatureServe, Arlington, VA. Available at: (accessed 5 October 2009).
49. Rosenfield, J.A. (2002) Pattern and process in the geographical ranges of freshwater fishes. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 11, 323-332.
50. Sandel, B. (2009) Geometric constraint model selection - an example with New World birds and mammals. Ecography, 32, 1001-1010.
51. Schlachter, K.J. (2010) Range shape and range elongation of North American trees. Physical Geography, 31, 40-57.
52. Soberón, J. & Nakamura, M. (2009) Niches and distributional areas: concepts, methods, and assumptions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 106, 19644-19650.
53. Svenning, J.C. & Skov, F. (2007) Ice age legacies in the geographical distribution of tree species richness in Europe. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 16, 234-245.
54. Svenning, J.C., Normand, S. & Skov, F. (2008) Postglacial dispersal limitation of widespread forest plant species in nemoral Europe. Ecography, 31, 316-326.
55. Whittaker, R.H. (1975) Communities and ecosystems, 2nd edn. Macmillan, New York.
56. Whittaker, R.J., Willis, K.J. & Field, R. (2001) Scale and species richness: towards a general, hierarchical theory of species diversity. Journal of Biogeography, 28, 453-470.
57. Whittaker, R.J., Nogués-Bravo, D. & Araújo, M.B. (2007) Geographical gradients of species richness: a test of the water-energy conjecture of Hawkins et al. (2003) using European data for five taxa. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 16, 76-89.