Inclusive inquiry science using peer-mediated embedded instruction for students with moderate intellectual disability

Exceptional Children

Volumn 78, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 301-317

  Jimenez, Bree A ^a   Browder, Diane M ^b   Spooner, Fred ^b   Dibiase, Warren ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84858661870     PISSN: 00144029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/001440291207800303     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Browder, D. M., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., Spooner, F., Mims, P. J., & Baker, J. (2009). Using time delay to teach literacy to students with severe developmental disabilities. Exceptional Children, 75, 343-364.
2. Browder, D. M., Trela, K., Courtade, G. R., Jimenez, B. A., Knight, V, & Flowers, C. (2010). Teaching mathematics and science standards to students with moderate and severe developmental disabilities. The Journal of Special Education. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10-l 177/0022466910369942
3. Carter, E. W, Cushing, L. S., & Kennedy, C. H. (2009). Peer support strategies: Improving all students' social lives and learning. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
4. Carter, E. W, & Kennedy, C. H. (2006). Promoting access to the general curriculum using peer support strategies. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31, 284-292.
5. Carter, E. W., Siseo, L. G., Melekoglu, M. A., & Kurkowski, C. (2007). Peer supports as an alternative to individually assigned paraprofessionals in inclusive high school classrooms. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 32, 213-227.
6. Courtade, G., Browder, D., Spooner, E, & DiBiase, W. (2010). Training teachers to use an inquiry-based task analysis to teach science to students with moderate and severe disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 45, 378-399.
7. Gast, D. L. (2010). Single subject research methodology in behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Routledge.
8. Horner, R. D., & Baer, D. M. (1978). Multiple-probe technique: A variation of the multiple baseline. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 189-196. http://dx. doi.org/10.1901 /jaba. 1978.11 -189
9. Horner, R. H., Carr, E. G., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S., & Wolery, M. (2005). The use of singlesubject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165-180.
10. Jameson, J. M., McDonnell,I., Johnson, J. W, Riesen, T., & Polychronis, S. (2007). A comparison of one to one embedded instruction in the general education classroom and one to one massed practice instruction in the special education classroom. Education & Treatment of Children, 30, 23-44. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1353/etc.2007.0001
11. Jameson, J. M., McDonnell, J., Polychronis, S., & Riesen, T. (2008). Embedded, constant time delay instruction by peers without disabilities in general education classrooms. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 46, 346-363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1352 /2008.46:346-363
12. Jimenez, B. A., Browder, D. M., Sc Courtade, G. R. (2009). An exploratory study of self-directed science concept learning by students with moderate intellectual disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 34(2), 33-46.
13. Johnson, M. J., & McDonnell, J. (2004). An exploratory study of the implementation of embedded instruction by general educators with students with developmental disabilities. Education & Treatment of Children, 27, 46-63.
14. McDonnell, J., Johnson, J. W, & McQuivey, C. (2008). Embedded instruction for students with developmental disabilities in general education classrooms. Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
15. McDonnell, J., Johnson, J. W, Polychronis, S., & Riesen, T. (2002). The effects of embedded instruction on students with moderate disabilities enrolled in general education classes. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 37, 363-377. (Pubitemid 40771769)
16. McDonnell, I.., Mathot-Buckner, C, Thorson, N., & Fister, S. (2001). Supporting the inclusion of students with moderate and severe disabilities in junior high school general education classes: The effects of classwide peer tutoring, multi-element curriculum, and accommodations. Education & Treatment of Children, 24, 141-160.
17. Miracle, S. A, Collins, B. C, Schuster, J. W, & Grisham-Brown, J. (2001). Peer versus teacher delivered instruction: Effects on acquisition and maintenance. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 36, 375-385-
18. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/ openbook .php?record-id=4962&page=Rl
19. Siegel-Causey, E., McMorris, C, McGowen, S., & Sands-Buss, S. (1998). In junior high you take earth science: Including a student with severe disabilities into an academic class. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 31(1), 66-72.
20. Snell, M. E., & Delano, M. (2011). Teaching self-care skills. In M. Snell & F. Brown (Eds.), Instruction of students with severe disabilities (7th ed., pp. 377-430). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice-Hall.
21. Spooner, E, Knight, V, Browder, D., Jimenez, B. A., & DiBiase, W (2011). Evaluating evidence-based practices in teaching science content to students with severe developmental disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 36, 62-75.
22. Wolery, M., Anthony. L., Caldwell, N. K., Snyder, E. D., & Morgante, J. D. (2002). Embedding and distributing constant time delay in circle time and transitions. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 22, 14-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/027112140202200102
23. Wolery, M., Anthony, L., Snyder, E. D., Werts, M. G., & Katzenmeyer, J. (1997). Training elementary teachers to embed instruction during classroom activities. Education & Treatment of Children, 20, 40-58.