Engaging communities in area-based regeneration: The role of participatory evaluation

Policy Studies

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 157-171

  Dobbs, Lynn ^a   Moore, Craig ^a  

^a NORTHUMBRIA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84858654966     PISSN: 01442872     EISSN: 14701006     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0144287022000045966     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. ARNSTEIN, S. R., 1969. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35: 216-224.
2. ATKINSON, R., and COPK, S., 1997. “ Community participation and urban regeneration ”. In Contested Communities: Experiences, Struggles, and Policies, Edited by: Hoggett, P., Bristol: Policy Press.
3. BERESFORD, P., and CROFT, S., 1993. Citizen Involvement: A Practical Guide for Change, Basingstoke: Macmillan.
4. BOTES, L., and VAN RENSBURG, D., 2000. Community participation in development: nine plagues and twelve commandments. Community Development Journal, 35(1): 41-58.
5. BRENNAN, A., RHODKS, J., and TYLER, P., 1999. The distribution of SRB challenge fund expenditure in relation to local area need in England. Urban Studies, 36(12): 2069-2084.
6. CARLEY, M., 2000. Urban Regeneration through Partnership: A Study in Nine Urban Regions in England, Scotland and Wales, Bristol: Policy Press.
7. CENTRE FOR PARTICIPATION. 2001. Proue It: A Briefing, London: New Economics Foundation.
8. CHATTERTON, P., and BRADLEY, D., 2000. Bringing Britain together?. Local Economy, 15(2): 98-111.
9. CHUMROW, J., 1995. Housing action trusts: a possible role model. Parliamentary Affairs, 48(2): 254-270.
10. DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT. 1992. City Challenge Bidding Guidance 1993-1994, London: DoE.
11. DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT. 1993. Bidding Guidance: A Guide to Funding from the Single Regeneration Budget, London: DoE.
12. DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND THE REGIONS. 1998. Community-based Regeneration Initiatives: A Working Paper, London: DETR.
13. DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND THE REGIONS. 1999. Involving Communities in Urban and Rural Regeneration: Regeneration Research Summary 2, London: DETR.
14. FARRELL, C. M., 2000. Citizen participation in governance. Public Money and Management, 20(1): 31-37.
15. FERNIE, K., and MCCARTHY, J., 2001. Partnership and community involvement: institutional morphing in Dundee. Local Economy, 16(4): 299-311.
16. FOLEY, P., and MARTIN, S., 2000. A new deal for the community? Public participation in regeneration and local service delivery. Policy and Politics, 28(4): 479-491.
17. GREGORY, A., 2000. Problematising participation: a critical review of approaches to participation in evaluation theory. Evaluation, 6(2): 179-199.
18. CUBA, E. G., and LINCOLN, Y. S., 1989. Fourth Generation Evaluation, London: Sage.
19. HEALEY, P., 1997. Collaborative Planning, Basingstoke: Macmillan.
20. JONES, R., 2002. With a little help from my friends: managing public participation in local government. Public Monty and Management, 22(2): 31-36.
21. LAUGHLIN, R., and BROADBENT, J., 1996. Redesigning fourth generation evaluation: an evaluation model for the public-sector reforms in the UK?. Evaluation, 2(4): 431-452.
22. LOWNDES, V., PRATCHETT, L., and STOKER, G., 2001. Trends in public participation: Part 2 - citizens' perspectives. Public Administration, 79(2): 445-455.
23. MYERS, F., and MACDONALD, C., 1996. Power to the people? Involving users and carers in needs assessment and care planning - views from the practitioner. Health and Social Care in the Community, 4(2): 86-95.
24. NORTH, P., 2000. Is there space for organisation from below within the UK government's action zones? A test of "collaborative planning". Urban Studies, 37(8): 1261-1278.
25. OAKLEY, P., 1991. Projects with People, Geneva: International Labour Organisation.
26. POWER, M., 1997. The Audit Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27. RAHMAN, M. A., 1993. People's Self-development, London: Zed Books.
28. REBIEN, C. C., 1996. Participatory evaluation of development assistance: dealing with power and facultative learning. Evaluation, 2(2): 151-172.
29. ROBINSON, F., and SHAW, K., 1991. Urban regeneration and community involvement. Local Economy, 6(1): 61-72.
30. SANDERSON, I., 1999. Participation and democratic renewal. Policy and Politics, 27(3): 325-341.
31. SANDERSON, I., 2002. Evaluation, policy learning and evidence-based policy making. Public Administration, 80(1): 1-22.
32. SCHUFTAN, C., 1998. The community development dilemma: what is really empowering?. Community Development Journal, 31(3): 260-264.
33. SOCIAL EXCLUSION UNIT. 1998. Bringing Britain Together A National Strategy for Neighbourhood Renewal, London: HMSO. Cm 4045
34. SOCIAL EXCLUSION UNIT. 2001. A New Commitment to Neighbourhood Renewal National Strategy Action Plan, London: HMSO.
35. TAYLOR, M., 2000. Maintaining community involvement in regeneration: what are the issues?. Local Economy, 15(3): 251-267.
36. WATT, S., HlGGINS, C., and KENDRICK, A., 2000. Community participation in the development of services: a move towards community empowerment. Community Development Journal, 35(2): 120-132.