Effets de Product Lifecycle Management sur la fiabilité et la productivité: Une comparaison entre deux contextes de développement produit

Management

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 294-331

  Merminod, Valéry ^a   Mothe, Caroline ^b   Rowe, Frantz ^c  

^a SKEMA BUSINESS SCHOOL   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE SAVOIE   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE NANTES   (France)

Author keywords

New product development; Performance; Product Lifecycle Management; Productivity; Reliability

Indexed keywords

EID: 84858612720     PISSN: 12864892     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3917/mana.124.0294     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Baccarini, D. (1996). The concept of complexity - a review. International Journal of Project Management, 14(4), 201-204.
2. Banker, R., Chang, H., & Kao, Y. (2001). Impact of information technology on public accounting firm productivity. Journal of Information Systems, 16(2), 209-222.
3. Batenburg, R., Helms, R., & Versendaal, J. (2005). The maturity of product lifecycle management in Dutch organizations: A strategic alignment perspective, PLM'05: International conference on product life cycle management, Lyon, France, http://www.cs.uu.nl/research/techreps/repo/CS-2005/2005-009.pdf
4. Bourgeon, L. (2002). Temporal context of organizational learning in new product development projects. Creativity and Innovation Management, 11(3), 175-183.
5. Boullier, D. (1995). L'usager, l'utilisateur et le récepteur: 12 ans d'exploration dans les machines à communiquer, Habilitation à Diriger des Recherches, Université Michel de Montaigne.
6. Brion, S. (2005). La coordination par la vigilance collective réciproque. Revue Française de Gestion, 154(1), 143-157.
7. Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. (1995). Product development: past research, present findings and future directions. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 343-378.
8. Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1997). The art of continuous change: linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 1-35.
9. Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. (1996). Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the return to information systems spending. Management Science, 42(4), 541-558.
10. Butler, B., & Gray, P. (2006). Reliability, mindfulness and information systems. MIS Quarterly, 30(2), 211-224.
11. Calvi, R., Blanco, E., & Koike, T. (2005). Coopérer en conception pour améliorer les supply chains de demain. Un défi pour les entreprises virtuelles. Revue Française de Gestion, 156(31), 187-202.
12. Campbell, D. T. (1975). Degrees of freedom and the case study. Comparative Political Studies, 8(2), 178-193.
13. Campbell, D. T. (1988). Methodology and Epistemology for Social Science: Selected Papers. E. S. Overman, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
14. Carlile, P. (2002). A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science, 13(4), 442-455.
15. Carlile, P. (2004). Transferring, translating and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization Science, 15(5), 558-568.
16. Chanal, V. (2003). Management des connaissances et innovation: de nouveaux enjeux pour les systèmes d'information. In M.L. Caron-Fasan & N. Lesca, Présent et Futurs des systèmes d'information (pp. 267-289). Paris: PUG.
17. Clark, K., & Fujimoto, T. (1990). The power of product integrity. Harvard Business Review, 68(6), 107-118.
18. Clark, K., & Fujimoto, T. (1991). Product Development Performance: strategy, organization and management in the world auto industry. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.
19. Clarke, L. (1993). The disqualification heuristic: when do organizations misperceive risk?. Research in Social Problems and Public Policy, 5(1), 289-312.
20. Cooper, R., & Kleinschmidt, E. (1990), Stage Gate systems for new product success. Marketing Management, 4(1), 20-24.
21. Daft, R., & Lengel, R. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554-571.
22. De Luca, L., Verona, G., & Vicari, S. (2009). Market orientation and R&D effectiveness in high technology firms: An empirical investigation in the biotechnology industry. Journal of Product Innovation Management, forthcoming.
23. Deming, W. (1982). Out of the crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Center for Advanced Engineering Study.
24. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. (2007). Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25-32.
25. Garel, G. (1999). La mesure et la réduction des délais de développement des produits nouveaux. Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 14(2), 29-47.
26. Giard, V. (1991). Gestion de projets. Paris: Economica.
27. Gilbert, C., Amalberti, R., Laroche, H., & Paries, J. (2007). Errors and failures: towards a new safety paradigm. Journal of Risk Research, 10(7), 959-975.
28. Goodhue, D., & Thompson, R. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 19(2), 213-236.
29. Grant, R. M. (1996). Prospering in dynamically competitive environments: organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science, 7(4), 375-387.
30. Grieves, M. (2006). Product Lifecycle Management: Driving the Next Generation of Lean Management. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
31. Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49(2), 149-164.
32. Hardgrave, B., Davis, F., & Riemenschneider, C. (2003). Investigating determinants of software developers' intentions to follow methodologies. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20(1), 123-152.
33. Hatchuel, A. (1994). Apprentissages collectifs et activités de conception. Revue Française de Gestion, 99, 20-36.
34. Hoopes, D., & Postrel, S. (1999). Shared Knowledge, Glitches, and Product Development Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 837-865.
35. Iansiti, M., & MacCormack, A. (1997). Developing products on Internet time. Harvard Business Review, 75(5), 108-117.
36. Journé, B. (2005). Etudier le management de l'imprévu: méthode dynamique d'observation in situ. Finance Contrôle Stratégie, 8(4), 63-91.
37. Kraut, R., Sumais, S., Koch, S., & Kling, R. (1989). Computerization, productivity and quality of work-life. Communications of the ACM, 32(2), 220-238.
38. Kusunoki, K., Nonaka, I., & Nagata, A. (1998). Organizational Capabilities in Product Development of Japanese Firms: A Conceptual Framework and Empirical Findings. Organization Science, 9(6), 699-718.
39. Le Masson, P., Hatchuel, A., & Weil, B. (2006). Les processus d'innovation: conception innovante et croissance des entreprises. Paris: Hermès Lavoisier.
40. Leonard-Barton, D. (1990). A dual methodology for case studies: synergistic use of longitudinal single site with replicated multiple sites. Organization Science, 1(3), 248-266.
41. Lyytinen, K., Mathiassen, L., & Ropponen, J. (1998). Attention shaping and software risks: a categorical analysis of four classical approaches. Information Systems Research, 9(3), 233-255.
42. Malhotra, A., Gosain, S., & El Sawy, O. (2005). Absorptive capacity configurations in supply chains: gearing for partner enabled market knowledge creation. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 29(1), 145-187.
43. Mallick, D. N., & Schroeder, R. G. (2005). An integrated framework for measuring product development performance in high technology industries. Production and Operations Management, 14(2), 142-158.
44. Malone, T., & Crowston, K. (1994). The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM computing surveys, 26(1), 87-120.
45. Marciniak, R., & Pagerie, M. (1999). Gestion de projet: guide pratique de la réussite de tous vos projets et produits industriels. Paris: Weka.
46. Marciniak, R., & Rowe, F. (1999). Styles de coordination avec les sous-traitants, expérience commune et performance économique: le cas de trois projets dans le bâtiment. Systèmes d'Information et Management, 4(2), 37-64.
47. Merminod, V. (2007). TIC, partage des connaissances et fiabilité du développement produit distribué: une approche par le «glitch» au sein du Groupe SEB. Systèmes d'Information et Management, 12(1), 11-38.
48. Meyer, M., & Utterback, J. (1997). Metrics for managing research and development in the context of the product family. Management Science, 43(1), 88-112.
49. Mostefai, S., & Batouche, M. (2005). Data integration in Product Lifecycle Management: an ontology-based approach, PLM'05: International conference on product life cycle management, Lyon, France.
50. Nambisan, S. (2003). Information systems as a reference discipline for new product development. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 27(1), 1-18.
51. Nijssen, D., & Frambach, R. (2000). Determinants of the adoption of new product development tools by industrial firms. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(2), 121-131.
52. Nonaka, I. (1994). Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14-37.
53. Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Konno, N. (2000). SECI, Ba and leadership: a unified model of dynamic knowledge creation. Long Range Planning, 33(1), 5-34.
54. Okhuysen, G., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2002). Integrating knowledge in groups: How formal interventions enable flexibility. Organization Science, 13(4), 370-386.
55. Pavlou, P. A., & El Sawy, O. (2006). From IT leveraging competence to competitive advantage in turbulent environments: the case of new product development. Information Systems Research, 17(3), 198-230.
56. Pol, G., Jared, G., Merlo, C., & Legardeur, J. (2005). From PDM systems to integrated project management systems: a case study, PLM'05: International conference on product life cycle management, Lyon, France.
57. Roberts, K. H. (1990). Some characteristics of one type of high reliability organization. Organization Science, 1(2), 160-176.
58. Rowe, F. (1994). Des banques et des réseaux: Productivité et avantages concurrentiels. Paris: Economica.
59. Short, J., & Venkatraman, N. (1992). Beyond business process redesign: redefining Baxter's business network. Sloan Management Review, 34(1), 7-21.
60. Stark, J. (2004). Product Lifecycle Management - 21st century Paradigm for Product Realization. Berlin: Springer Verlag, Decision Engineering Series.
61. Strassman, P. (1997). The squandered computer. New Canaan, Connecticut: The Information Economics Press.
62. Takikonda, M., & Montoya-Weiss, M. (2001). Integrating operations and marketing perspectives of product innovation: the influence of organizational process factors and capabilities on development performance. Management Science, 47(1), 151-172.
63. Takikonda, M., & Rosenthal, S. (2000). Successful implementation of product development projects: balancing firmness and flexibility in the innovation process. Journal of Operations Management, 18(1), 401-425.
64. Terssac, G., & Friedberg, E. (1996). Coopération et Conception. Toulouse: Octares Edition.
65. Thomke, S., & Fujimoto, T. (2000). The effect of «front-loading» problem solving on product development performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 17(2), 128-142.
66. Torkzadeh, G., Koufteros, X., & Doll, J. W. (2005). Confirmatory factor analysis and factorial invariance of the impact of information technology instrument. OMEGA, 33(2), 107-118.
67. Verona, G. (1999). A resource based view of product development. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 132-142.
68. Weick, K., & Roberts, K. (1993). Collective mind in organizations: heedful interrelating on flight desks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(3), 357-381.
69. Weick, K., Sutcliffe, K., & Obstfeld, D. (1999). Organizing for high reliability: processes of collective mindfulness. Research in Organizational Behaviour, 1(21), 81-123.
70. Weick, K., & Sutcliffe, K. (2000). High reliability: The power of mindfulness. In Leader to leader, San Francisco: Drucker Foundation/Jossey-Bass.
71. Weill, P. (1992). The relationship between investment in Information Technologies and firm performance: a study of valve industry. Information Systems Research, 3(4), 307-331.
72. Yassine, A. (2007). Investigating product development process reliability and robutness using simulation. Journal of Engineering Design, 18(6), 545-561.
73. Zirger, B., & Maidique, M. (1990). A model of new product development: an empirical test. Management Science, 36(1), 867-883.