The division of labor between the neocortex and hippocampus

Connectionist Models in Cognitive Psychology

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 143-174

  O'Reilly, Randall C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84858609947     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203647110     Document Type: Chapter

References (77)

1. Aggleton, J. P., & Brown, M. W. (1999). Episodic memory, amnesia, and the hippocampal- anterior thalamic axis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 425-490.
2. Aggleton, J. P., & Shaw, C. (1996). Amnesia and recognition memory: A re-analysis of psychometric data. Neuropsychologia, 34, 51-62.
3. Alvarado, M. C., & Rudy, J. W. (1995). A comparison of kainic acid plus colchicine and ibotenic acid induced hippocampal formation damage on four configural tasks in rats. Behavioral Neuroscience, 109, 1052-1062.
4. Alvarez, P., & Squire, L. R. (1994). Memory consolidation and the medial temporal lobe: A simple network model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 91, 7041-7045.
5. Barnes, C. A., McNaughton, B. L., Mizumori, S. J. Y., Leonard, B. W., & Lin, L.-H. (1990). Comparison of spatial and temporal characteristics of neuronal activity in sequential stages of hippocampal processing. Progress in Brain Research, 83, 287-300.
6. Barnes, J. M., & Underwood, B. J. (1959). Fate of first-list associations in transfer theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 97-105.
7. Boss, B. D., Peterson, G. M., & Cowan, W. M. (1985). On the numbers of neurons in the dentate gyrus of the rat. Brain Research, 338, 144-150.
8. Boss, B. D., Turlejski, K., Stanfield, B. B., & Cowan, W. M. (1987). On the numbers of neurons in fields CA1 and CA3 of the hippocampus of Sprague-Dawley and Wistar rats. Brain Research, 406, 280-287.
9. Burgess, N., & O'Keefe, J. (1996). Neuronal computations underlying the firing of place cells and their role in navigation. Hippocampus, 6, 749-762.
10. Chun, M. M., & Phelps, E. A. (1999). Memory deficits for implicit contextual information in amnesic subjects with hippocampal damage. Nature Neuroscience, 2(9), 844-847.
11. Cohen, N. J., & Eichenbaum, H. (1993). Memory, amnesia, and the hippocampal system. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Collingridge, G. L., & Bliss, T. V. P. (1987). NMDA receptors-their role in long-term potentiation. Trends in Neurosciences, 10, 288-293.
13. Crick, F. H. C. (1989). The recent excitement about neural networks. Nature, 337, 129-132.
14. Fanselow, M. S. (1990). Factors governing one-trial contextual conditioning. Animal Learning and Behavior, 18, 264-270.
15. French, R. M. (1992). Semi-distributed representations and catastrophic forgetting in connectionist networks. Connection Science, 4, 365-377.
16. Glisky, E. L., Schacter, D. L., & Tulving, E. (1986). Computer learning by memory-impaired patients: Acquisition and retention of complex knowledge. Neuropsychologia, 24, 313-328.
17. Gluck, M. A., & Myers, C. E. (1993). Hippocampal mediation of stimulus representation: A computational theory. Hippocampus, 3, 491-516.
18. Godden, D. R., & Baddeley, A. D. (1975). Context-dependent memory in two natural environments:On land and under water. British Journal of Psychology, 66, 325-331.
19. Good, M., & Bannerman, D. (1997). Differential effects of ibotenic acid lesions of the hippocampus and blockade of n-methyl-d-aspartate receptor-dependent long-term potentiation on contextual processing in rats. Behavioral Neuroscience, 111, 1171-1183.
20. Hall, G., & Honey, R. C. (1990). Context-specific conditioning in the conditioned-emotionalresponse procedure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 16, 271-278.
21. Hasselmo, M. E. (1995). Neuromodulation and cortical function: Modeling the physiological basis of behavior. Behavioural Brain Research, 67, 1-27.
22. Hasselmo, M. E., & Wyble, B. (1997). Free recall and recognition in a network model of the hippocampus: Simulating effects of scopolamine on human memory function. Behavioural Brain Research, 89, 1-34.
23. Hebb, D. O. (1949). The organization of behavior. New York: Wiley.
24. Holdstock, J. S., Mayes, A. R., Roberts, N., Cezayirli, E., Isaac, C. L., O'Reilly, R. C., & Norman, K. A. (2002). Under what conditions is recognition spared relative to recall after selective hippocampal damage in humans? Hippocampus, 12, 341-351.
25. Honey, R. C., & Good, M. (1993). Selective hippocampal lesions abolish the contextual specificity of latent inhibition and conditioning. Behavioral Neuroscience, 107, 23-33.
26. Honey, R. C., Watt, A., & Good, M. (1998). Hippocampal lesions disrupt an associative mismatch process. Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 2226-2230.
27. Honey, R. C., Willis, A., & Hall, G. (1990). Context specificity in pigeon autoshaping. Learning and Motivation, 21, 125-136.
28. Jacoby, L. L., Yonelinas, A. P., & Jennings, J. M. (1997). The relation between conscious and unconscious (automatic) influences: A declaration of independence. In J. D. Cohen, & J. W. Schooler (Eds.), Scientific approaches to consciousness (pp. 13-47). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
29. Kiernan, M. J., & Westbrook, R. F. (1993). Effects of exposure to a to-be-shocked environment upon the rat's freezing response: Evidence for facilitation, latent inhibition, and perceptual learning. Quarterly Journal of Psychology, 46B, 271-288.
30. Kim, J. J., & Fanselow, M. S. (1992). Modality-specific retrograde amnesia of fear. Science, 256, 675-677.
31. Kortge, C. A. (1993). Episodic memory in connectionist networks. Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 764-771). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
32. Maren, S., Aharonov, G., & Fanselow, M. S. (1997). Neurotoxic lesions of the dorsal hippocampus and Pavlovian fear conditioning. Behavioural Brain Research, 88, 261-274.
33. Marr, D. (1969). A theory of cerebellar cortex. Journal of Physiology (London), 202, 437-470.
34. Marr, D. (1970). A theory for cerebral neocortex. Proceedings of the Royal Society (London) B, 176, 161-234.
35. Marr, D. (1971). Simple memory: A theory for archicortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society (London) B, 262, 23-81.
36. Mayes, A. R., MacDonald, C., Donlan, L., & Pears, J. (1992). Amnesics have a disproportionately severe memory deficit for interactive context. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45A, 265-297.
37. McClelland, J. L., & Goddard, N. H. (1996). Considerations arising from a complementary learning systems perspective on hippocampus and neocortex. Hippocampus, 6, 654-665.
38. McClelland, J. L., McNaughton, B. L., & O'Reilly, R. C. (1995). Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: Insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. Psychological Review, 102, 419-457.
39. McCloskey, M., & Cohen, N. J. (1989). Catastrophic interference in connectionist networks: The sequential learning problem. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 24, pp. 109-164). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
40. McDonald, R. J., Murphy, R. A., Guarraci, F. A., Gortler, J. R., White, N. M., & Baker, A. G. (1997). Systematic comparison of the effects of hippocampal and fornix-fimbria lesions on the acquisition of three configural discriminations. Hippocampus, 7, 371-388.
41. McNaughton, B. L., & Morris, R. G. M. (1987). Hippocampal synaptic enhancement and information storage within a distributed memory system. Trends in Neurosciences, 10(10), 408-415.
42. McNaughton, B. L., & Nadel, L. (1990). Hebb-Marr networks and the neurobiological representation of action in space. In M. A. Gluck, & D. E. Rumelhart (Eds.), Neuroscience and connectionist theory (Chap. 1, pp. 1-63). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
43. McRae, K., & Hetherington, P. A. (1993). Catastrophic interference is eliminated in pretrained networks. Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 723-728). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
44. Moll, M., & Miikkulainen, R. (1997). Convergence-zone episodic memory: Analysis and simulations. Neural Networks, 10, 1017-1036.
45. Norman, K. A., & O'Reilly, R. C. (in press). Modeling hippocampal and neocortical contributions to recognition memory: A complementary learning systems approach. Psychological Review.
46. O'Keefe, J., & Nadel, L. (1978). The hippocampus as a cognitive map. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
47. O'Reilly, R. C. (1996). Biologically plausible error-driven learning using local activation differences: The generalized recirculation algorithm. Neural Computation, 8(5), 895-938.
48. O'Reilly, R. C. (1998). Six principles for biologically-based computational models of cortical cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2(11), 455-462.
49. O'Reilly, R. C. (2001). Generalization in interactive networks: The benefits of inhibitory competition and Hebbian learning. Neural Computation, 13, 1199-1242.
50. O'Reilly, R. C., & McClelland, J. L. (1994). Hippocampal conjunctive encoding, storage, and recall: Avoiding a trade-off. Hippocampus, 4(6), 661-682.
51. O'Reilly, R. C., & Munakata, Y. (2000). Computational explorations in cognitive neuroscience:Understanding the mind by simulating the brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
52. O'Reilly, R. C., & Norman, K. A. (2002). Hippocampal and neocortical contributions to memory:Advances in the complementary learning systems framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 505-510.
53. O'Reilly, R. C., Norman, K. A., & McClelland, J. L. (1998). A hippocampal model of recognition memory. In M. I. Jordan, M. J. Kearns, & S. A. Solla (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems 10 (pp. 73-79). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
54. O'Reilly, R. C., & Rudy, J. W. (2000). Computational principles of learning in the neocortex and hippocampus. Hippocampus, 10, 389-397.
55. O'Reilly, R. C., & Rudy, J. W. (2001). Conjunctive representations in learning and memory:Principles of cortical and hippocampal function. Psychological Review, 108, 311-345.
56. Phillips, R. G., & LeDoux, J. E. (1994). Lesions of the dorsal hippocampal formation interfere with background but not foreground contextual fear conditioning. Learning and Memory, 1, 34-44.
57. Rolls, E. T. (1990). Principles underlying the representation and storage of information in neuronal networks in the primate hippocampus and cerebral cortex. In S. F. Zornetzer, J. L. Davis, & C. Lau (Eds.), An introduction to neural and electronic networks (pp. 73-90). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
58. Rudy, J. W., & O'Reilly, R. C. (1999). Contextual fear conditioning, conjunctive representations, pattern completion, and the hippocampus. Behavioral Neuroscience, 113, 867-880.
59. Rudy, J. W., & O'Reilly, R. C. (2001). Conjunctive representations, the hippocampus, and contextual fear conditioning. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 1, 66-82.
60. Rudy, J. W., & Sutherland, R. J. (1994). The memory coherence problem, configural associations, and the hippocampal system. In D. L. Schacter, & E. Tulving (Eds.), Memory systems 1994 (pp. 119-146). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
61. Rudy, J. W., & Sutherland, R. J. (1995). Configural association theory and the hippocampal formation: An appraisal and reconfiguration. Hippocampus, 5, 375-389.
62. Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986). Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature, 323, 533-536.
63. Save, E., Poucet, B., Foreman, N., & Buhot, N. (1992). Object exploration and reactions to spatial and nonspatial changes in hooded rats following damage to parietal cortex or hippocampal formation. Behavioral Neuroscience, 106, 447-456.
64. Schmajuk, N. A., & DiCarlo, J. J. (1992). Stimulus configuration, classical conditioning, and hippocampal function. Psychological Review, 99(2), 268-305.
65. Sherry, D. F., & Schacter, D. L. (1987). The evolution of multiple memory systems. Psychological Review, 94(4), 439-454.
66. Sloman, S. A., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1992). Reducing interference in distributed memories through episodic gating. In A. Healy, S. Kosslyn, & R. Shiffrin (Eds.), Essays in honor of W. K. Estes (pp. 227-248). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
67. Squire, L. R. (1992). Memory and the hippocampus: A synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and humans. Psychological Review, 99, 195-231.
68. Squire, L. R., Shimamura, A. P., & Amaral, D. G. (1989). Memory and the hippocampus. In J. H. Byrne, & W. O. Berry (Eds.), Neural models of plasticity: Experimental and theoretical approaches (pp. 208-239). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
69. Sutherland, R. J., & Rudy, J. W. (1989). Configural association theory: The role of the hippocampal formation in learning, memory, and amnesia. Psychobiology, 17(2), 129-144.
70. Tamamaki, N. (1991). The organization of reciprocal connections between the subiculum, field CA1 and the entorhinal cortex in the rat. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, 17, 134.
71. Touretzky, D. S., & Redish, A. D. (1996). A theory of rodent navigation based on interacting representations of space. Hippocampus, 6, 247-270.
72. Treves, A., & Rolls, E. T. (1994). A computational analysis of the role of the hippocampus in memory. Hippocampus, 4, 374-392.
73. Vargha-Khadem, F., Gadian, D. G., Watkins, K. E., Connelly, A., Van Paesschen, W., & Mishkin, M. (1997). Differential effects of early hippocampal pathology on episodic and semantic memory. Science, 277, 376-380.
74. White, H. (1989). Learning in artificial neural networks: A statistical perspective. Neural Computation, 1, 425-464.
75. Wickelgren, W. A. (1979). Chunking and consolidation: A theoretical synthesis of semantic networks, configuring in conditioning, S-R versus cognitive learning, normal forgetting, the amnesic syndrome, and the hippocampal arousal system. Psychological Review, 86, 44-60.
76. Wu, X., Baxter, R. A., & Levy, W. B. (1996). Context codes and the effect of noisy learning on a simplified hippocampal CA3 model. Biological Cybernetics, 74, 159-165.
77. Zipser, D., & Andersen, R. A. (1988). A backpropagation programmed network that simulates response properties of a subset of posterior parietal neurons. Nature, 331, 679-684.