Image analysis workflow for 2-D electrophoresis gels based on imageJ

Proteomics Insights

Volumn 4, Issue , 2011, Pages 37-49

  Natale, Massimo ^a,b   Maresca, Bernardetta ^c   Abrescia, Paolo ^c   Bucci, Enrico M ^a,d  

^a BioDigitalValley Srl   (Italy)

^b POLITECNICO DI TORINO   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

^d CNR   (Italy)

Author keywords

2 D gels; Bioinformatics; Image analysis; Myocardial infarction; Spot matching

Indexed keywords

EID: 84858605128     PISSN: None     EISSN: 11786418     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4137/PRI.S7971     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Beat MR. Non-covalent and covalent protein labeling in two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Journal of Proteomics. July 21, 2008;71(2):231-44.
2. Natasha AK, Renata F, Denis VR, Kathryn SL. Comparison of DIGE and post-stained gel electrophoresis with both traditional and SameSpots analysis for quantitative proteomics. Proteomics. March 5, 2008;8(5):948-60.
3. Millioni R, Sbrignadello S, Tura A, Iori E, Murphy E, Tessari P. The inter- and intra-operator variability in manual spot segmentation and its effect on spot quantitation in two-dimensional electrophoresis analysis. Electrophoresis. May 2010;31(10):1739-42.
4. Millioni R, Miuzzo M, Sbrignadello S, et al. Delta2D and Proteomweaver: Performance evaluation of two different approaches for 2-DE analysis. Electrophoresis. Apr 2010;31(8):1311-7.
5. Berth M, Moser FM, Kolbe M, Bernhardt J. The state of the art in the analysis of two-dimensional gel electrophoresis images. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007;76:1223-43.
6. Millioni R, Sbrignadello S, Tura A, Iori E, Murphy E, Tessari P. The inter- and intra-operator variability in manual spot segmentation and its effect on spot quantitation in two-dimensional electrophoresis analysis. Electrophoresis. May 31, 2010;10:1739-42.
7. Kang Y, Techanukul T, Mantalaris A, Nagy JM. Comparison of three commercially available DIGE analysis software packages: minimal user intervention in gel-based proteomics. J Proteome Res. 2009;8(2):1077-84.
8. Clark BN, Gutstein HB. The myth of automated, high-throughput two-dimensional gel analysis. Proteomics. Mar 2008;8(6):1197-203.
9. Wheelock AM, Buckpitt AR. Software-induced variance in two-dimensional gel electrophoresis image analysis. Electrophoresis. 2005;26:4508-20.
10. Dowsey AW, Morris JS, Gutstein HB, Yang GZ. Informatics and statistics for analyzing 2-d gel electrophoresis images. Methods Mol Biol. 2010;604: 239-55.
11. Appel RD, Hoogland C, Bairoch A, Hochstrasser DF. Constructing a 2-D database for the World Wide Web. Methods Mol Biol. 1999;112:411-6.
12. Lemkin PF. Comparing two-dimensional electrophoretic gel images across the Internet. Electrophoresis. Mar-Apr 1997;18(3-4):461-70.
13. Lemkin PF, Myrick JM, Lakshmanan Y, et al. Exploratory data analysis groupware for qualitative and quantitative electrophoretic gel analysis over the Internet-WebGel. Electrophoresis. Dec 1999;20(18):3492-507.
14. Sorzano CO, Arganda-Carreras I, Thévenaz P, et al. Elastic image registration of 2-D gels for differential and repeatability studies. Proteomics. 2008; 8:62-5.
15. Pérès S, Molina L, Salvetat N, Granier C, Molina F. A new method for 2D gel spot alignment: application to the analysis of large sample sets in clinical proteomics. BMC Bioinformatics. October 28, 2008;9:460.
16. dos Anjos A, Møller AL, Ersbøll BK, Finnie C, Shahbazkia HR. New approach for segmentation and quantification of two-dimensional gel electrophoresis images. Bioinformatics. February 1, 2011;27(3):368-75. Epub Dec 2, 2010.
17. Morris JS, Clark BN, Wei W, Gutstein HB. Evaluating the performance of new approaches to spot quantification and differential expression in 2-dimensional gel electrophoresis studies. J Proteome Res. 2010;9: 595-604.
18. Marengo E, Robotti E, Antonucci F, Cecconi D, et al, Numerical approaches for quantitative analysis of two-dimensional maps: a review of commercial software and home-made systems. Proteomics. 2005;5:654-66.
19. Bandow JE, Baker JD, Berth M, Painter C. Improved image analysis workflow for 2-D gels enables large-scale 2-D gel-based proteomics studies-COPD biomarker discovery study. Proteomics. 2008;8:3030-41.
20. Maresca B, Cigliano L, Corsaro MM, et al. Current Quantitative determination of haptoglobin glycoform variants in psoriasis. Biol.Chem. Dec 2010;391(12):1429-39.
21. Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970;227(5259):680-5.
22. Chang J, Van Remmen H, Ward WF, Regnier FE, Richardson A, Cornell J. Processing of data generated by 2-dimensional gel electrophoresis for statistical analysis: missing data, normalization, and statistics. J Proteome Res. 2004;3:1210-8.
23. Nishihara JC, Champion KM. Quantitative evaluation of proteins in one- and two-dimensional polyacrylamide gels using a fluorescent stain. Electrophoresis. July 23, 2002;(14):2203-15.
24. Lemkin PF, Thornwall G. Flicker image comparison of 2-D gel images for putative protein identification using the 2DWG meta-database. Mol Biotechnol. Sep 1999;12(2):159-72.
25. Mateos-Cáceres PJ, García-Méndez A, López Farré A, et al. Proteomic analysis of plasma from patients during an acute coronary syndrome. JACC. October 19, 2004;44(8):1578-83.
26. López-Farré AJ, Mateos-Cáceres PJ, Sacristán D, et al. Relationship between vitamin D binding protein and aspirin resistance in coronary ischemic patients: a proteomic study. Journal of Proteome Research. 2007;6:2481-7.
27. Rao AK, Pratt C, Berke A, et al. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Trial-phase I: hemorrhagic manifestations and changes in plasma fibrinogen and the fibrinolytic system in patients treated with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator and streptokinase. J Am Coll Cardiol. Jan 1988;11(1):1-11.