Comparison of three commercially available DIGE analysis software packages: Minimal user intervention in gel-based proteomics

Journal of Proteome Research

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 1077-1084

  Kang, Yunyi ^a   Techanukul, Tanasit ^a   Mantalaris, Anthanasios ^a   Nagy, Judit M ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Decyder; Dymenston; Gel image analysis; Progenesis samespots; Proteomics

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CELL CULTURE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEOMICS;

ALGORITHMS; CELL LINE; ELECTROPHORESIS, GEL, TWO-DIMENSIONAL; HUMANS; PROTEOMICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 61849084174     PISSN: 15353893     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/pr800588f     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Alban, A.; David, S. C; Bjorkesten, L.; Andersson, C; Sloge, E.; Lewis, S.; Currie, I. A novel experimental design for comparative two-dimensional gel analysis: Two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis incorporating a pooled internal standard. Proteomics 2003, 3 (1), 36-44.
2. Tonge, R.; Shaw, J.; Middleton, B.; Rowlinson, R.; Rayner, S.; Young, J.; Pognan, F.; Hawkins, E.; Currie, I.; Davison, M. Validation and development of fluorescence two-dimensional differential gel electrophoresis proteomics technology. Proteomics 2001, 1 (3), 377-396.
3. Mahon, P.; Dupree, P. Quantitative and reproducible two- dimensional gel analysis using Phoretix 2D Full. Electrophoresis 2001, 22 (10), 2075-2085.
4. Arora, P. S.; Yamagiwa, H.; Srivastava, A.; Bolander, M. E.; Sarkar, G. Comparative evaluation of two two-dimensional gel electrophoresis image analysis software applications using synovial fluids from patients with joint disease. J. Orthop. Sci. 2005, 10 (2), 160- 166.
5. Rosengren, A. T.; Salmi, J. M.; Aittokallio, T.; Westerholm, J.; Lahesmaa, R.; Nyman, T. A.; Nevalainen, O. S. Comparison of PDQuest and Progenesis software packages in the analysis of two- dimensional electrophoresis gels. Proteomics 2003, 3 (10), 1936- 1946.
6. Raman, B.; Cheung, A.; Marten, M. R. Quantitative comparison and evaluation of two commercially available, two-dimensional electrophoresis image analysis software packages, Z3 and Melanie. Electrophoresis 2002, 23 (14), 2194-2202.
7. Rogers, M.; Graham, J.; Tonge, R. P. Using statistical image models for objective evaluation of spot detection in two-dimensional gels. Proteomics 2003, 3 (6), 879-886.
8. Nishihara, J. C; Champion, K. M. Quantitative evaluation of proteins in one- and two-dimensional polyacrylamide gels using a fluorescent stain. Electrophoresis 2002, 23 (14), 2203-2215.
9. Clark, B. N.; Gutstein, H. B. The myth of automated, high- throughput two-dimensional gel analysis. Proteomics 2008, 8 (6), 1197-1203.
10. Karp, N. A.; Feret, R.; Rubtsov, D. V.; Lilley, K. S. Comparison of DIGE and post-stained gel electrophoresis with both traditional and SameSpots analysis for quantitative proteomics. Proteomics 2008, 8 (5), 948-960.
11. Rathjen, J.; Lake, J. A.; Bettess, M. D.; Washington, J. M.; Chapman, G.; Rathjen, P. D. Formation of a primitive ectoderm like cell population, EPL cells, from ES cells in response to biologically derived factors. J. Cell Sci. 1999, 112 (Pt 5), 601-612.
12. Mummery, C. L.; van Achterberg, T. A.; van den Eijnden-van Raaij, A. J.; van Haaster, L.; Willemse, A.; deLaat, S. W.; Piersma, A. H. Visceral-endoderm-like cell lines induce differentiation of murine P19 embryonal carcinoma cells. Differentiation 1991, 46 (1), 51- 60.
13. Hwang, Y.; Randle, W. L.; Bielby, R. C; Polak, J. M.; Mantalaris, A. Enhanced derivation of osteogenic cells from murine embryonic stem cells after treatment with HepG2-conditioned medium and modulation of the embryoid body formation period: Application to skeletal tissue engineering. Tissue Eng. 2006, 12 (6), 1381-1392.
14. Kang, Y.; Nagy, J. M.; Polak, J. M.; Mantalaris, A. Proteomics characterization of the conditioned media produced by the visceral endoderm-like cell lines HepG2 and END2: Towards the defined medium for the osteogenic/chondrogenic differentiation of embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells Dev. 2008, 10.1089/scd.2008.0026.
15. Cutler, P.; Heald, G.; White, I. R.; Ruan, J. A novel approach to spot detection for two-dimensional gel electrophoresis images using pixel value collection. Proteomics 2003, 3 (4), 392-401.
16. Horgan, G. W. Sample Size and Replication in 2D Gel Electro phoresis Studies. J. Proteome Res. 2007, 6 (7), 2884-2887.
17. Fodor, I. K.; Nelson, D. O.; Alegria-Hartman, M.; Robbins, K.; Langlois, R. G.; Turteltaub, K. W.; Corzett, T. H.; McCutchen- Maloney, S. L. Statistical challenges in the analysis of two- dimensional difference gel electrophoresis experiments using DeCyderTM. Bioinformatics 2005, 21 (19), 3733-3740.
18. Karp, N. A.; Spencer, M.; Lindsay, H.; O'Dell, K.; Lilley, K. S. Impact of Replicate Types on Proteomic Expression Analysis. J. Proteome Res. 2005, 4 (5), 1867-1871.
19. Karp, N. A.; Lilley, K. S. Maximising sensitivity for detecting changes in protein expression: Experimental design using minimal CyDyes. Proteomics 2005, 5 (12), 3105-3115.
20. Karp, N. A.; Kreil, D. P.; Lilley, K. S. Determining a significant change in protein expression with DeCyder during a pair-wise comparison using two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis. Proteomics 2004, 4 (5), 1421-1432.
21. Dowsey, A. W.; Dunn, M. J.; Yang, G.-Z. The role of bioinformatics in two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Proteomics 2003, 3 (8), 1567-1596.
22. Almeida, J. S.; Stanislaus, R.; Krug, E.; Arthur, J. M. Normalization and analysis of residual variation in two-dimensional gel electrophoresis for quantitative differential proteomics. Proteomics 2005, 5 (5), 1242-1249.
23. Kultima, K.; Scholz, B.; Aim, H.; Skold, K.; Svensson, M.; Crossman, A. R.; Bezard, E.; Andrén, P. E.; Lönnstedt, I. Normalization and expression changes in predefined sets of proteins using 2D gel electrophoresis: a proteomic study of L-DOPA induced dyskinesia in an animal model of Parkinson's disease using DIGE. BMC Bioinf. 2006, 7, 475.
24. Rocke, D. M. A Model for Measurement Error for Gene Expression Arrays. J. Comput. Biol. 2001, 8 (6), 557-569.
25. Huber, W.; Von Heydebreck, A.; Sueltmann, H.; Poustka, A.; Vingron, M. Parameter estimation for the calibration and variance stabilization of microarray data. Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. 2003, 2 (1), 1008.
26. Kreil, D. P.; Karp, N. A.; Lilley, K. S. DNA microarray normalization methods can remove bias from differential protein expression analysis of 2D difference gel electrophoresis results. Bioinformatics 2004, 20 (13), 2026-2034.
27. Reah, I.; O'Gormann, M.; Borthwick, A.; Miller, D.; Bramwell, D. P15-T SameSpots: Validating a Novel Approach to 2D Electrophoresis Image Analysis.J. Biomol. Tech. 2007, 18 (1), 6.