Functional outcome of PFC Sigma fixed and rotating-platform total knee arthroplasty. A prospective randomised controlled trial

International Orthopaedics

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 349-354

  Hanusch, Birgit ^a   Lou, Thai Nurn ^a   Warriner, Gary ^b   Hui, Anthony ^a   Gregg, Paul ^a  

^a JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b DePuy International   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE RADIOGRAPHY; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE LIGAMENT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OSTEOLYSIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATELLA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS INFECTION; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RANGE OF MOTION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURVIVAL TIME; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT RESPONSE; WEIGHT BEARING;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; OSTEOLYSIS; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 77950917750     PISSN: 03412695     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-009-0901-3     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. FF Buechel Sr FF Buechel Jr MJ Pappas J D'Alessio 2001 Twenty-year evaluation of meniscal bearing and rotating platform knee replacements Clin Orthop Relat Res 388 41 50 10.1097/00003086-200107000-00008 11451131 (Pubitemid 32595005)
2. J Fisher H McEwen J Tipper L Jennings R Farrar M Stone I Ingham 2006 Wear-simulation analysis of rotating-platform mobile-bearing knees Orthopedics 29 9 Suppl S36 S41 17002146 (Pubitemid 44468685)
3. JJ Callaghan JN Insall AS Greenwald, et al. 2000 Mobile-bearing knee replacement: concepts and results J Bone Joint Surg Am 82 7 1020 1041
4. YH Kim HK Kook JS Kim 2001 Comparison of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties Clin Orthop Relat Res 392 101 115 10.1097/00003086-200111000-00013 11716371 (Pubitemid 33054934)
5. AJ Price JL Rees D Beard, et al. 2003 A mobile-bearing total knee prosthesis compared with a fixed-bearing prosthesis A multicentre single-blind randomised controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85 1 62 67 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s%2FnsVCktw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 36193045)
6. ST Woolson GD Northrop 2004 Mobile- vs. fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a clinical and radiologic study J Arthroplasty 19 2 135 140 10.1016/j.arth.2003.10.004 14973854 (Pubitemid 38228792)
7. P Aglietti A Baldini R Buzzi D Lup L De Luca 2005 Comparison of mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study J Arthroplasty 20 2 145 153 10.1016/j.arth.2004.09.032 15902852 (Pubitemid 40342700)
8. S Bhan R Malhotra EK Kiran S Shukla M Bijjawara 2005 A comparison of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty at a minimum follow-up of 4.5 years J Bone Joint Surg Am 87 10 2290 2296 10.2106/JBJS.D.02221 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2MrivFKisA%3D%3D 16203896 (Pubitemid 41407556)
9. T Watanabe T Tomita M Fujii J Hashimoto K Sugamoto H Yoshikawa 2005 Comparison between mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing knees in bilateral total knee replacements Int Orthop 29 3 179 181 10.1007/s00264-005-0646-6 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M3pvVShsQ%3D%3D 15809873 (Pubitemid 40922344)
10. KK Park CB Chang YG Kang SC Seong TK Kim 2007 Correlation of maximum flexion with clinical outcome after total knee replacement in Asian patients J Bone Joint Surg Br 89 5 604 608 10.1302/0301-620X.89B5.18117 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2szivVWgtQ%3D%3D 17540744 (Pubitemid 46958767)
11. Jacobs W, Anderson P, Limbeek J, Wymenga A (2004) Mobile bearing vs fixed bearing prostheses for total knee arthroplasty for post-operative functional status in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2):CD003130
12. AS Ranawat R Rossi I Loreti VJ Rasquinha JA Rodriguez CS Ranawat 2004 Comparison of the PFC Sigma fixed-bearing and rotating-platform total knee arthroplasty in the same patient: short-term results J Arthroplasty 19 1 35 39 10.1016/j.arth.2003.08.010 14716648 (Pubitemid 38112330)
13. MC Evans EM Parsons RD Scott TS Thornhill D Zurakowski 2006 Comparative flexion after rotating-platform vs fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty J Arthroplasty 21 7 985 991 10.1016/j.arth.2005.12.007 17027540 (Pubitemid 44485414)
14. C Luring H Bathis F Oczipka, et al. 2006 Two-year follow-up on joint stability and muscular function comparing rotating versus fixed bearing TKR Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14 7 605 611 10.1007/s00167-005-0020-7 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28vgtVShsA%3D%3D 16362360 (Pubitemid 44000070)
15. YH Kim DY Kim JS Kim 2007 Simultaneous mobile- and fixed-bearing total knee replacement in the same patients A prospective comparison of mid-term outcomes using a similar design of prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89 7 904 910
16. A Ladermann A Lubbeke R Stern N Riand D Fritschy 2008 Fixed-bearing versus mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomised, clinical and radiological study with mid-term results at 7 years Knee 15 3 206 210 10.1016/j.knee.2008.01.010 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1c3ptFWhsg%3D%3D 18329883
17. H Higuchi K Hatayama M Shimizu A Kobayashi T Kobayashi K Takagishi 2009 Relationship between joint gap difference and range of motion in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomised study between different platforms Int Orthop 33 997 1000 10.1007/s00264-009-0772-7 19399499
18. J Dawson R Fitzpatrick D Murray A Carr 1998 Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement J Bone Joint Surg Br 80 1 63 69 10.1302/0301-620X.80B1.7859 1:STN:280:DyaK1c7itVymsQ%3D%3D 9460955 (Pubitemid 28048491)
19. JN Insall LD Dorr RD Scott WN Scott 1989 Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system Clin Orthop Relat Res 248 13 14 2805470
20. Health Research Unit (2009) A randomised trial of different knee prosthesis (KAT). http://www.abdn.ac.uk/hsru/research/assessment/interventional/ kat/.
21. FC Ewald 1989 The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system Clin Orthop Relat Res 248 9 12 2805502 (Pubitemid 20204774)
22. Oh KJ, Pandher DS, Lee SH, Sung Joon SD,Jr, Lee ST (2008) Meta-analysis comparing outcomes of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing prostheses in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 24(6):873-884
23. V Wylde I Learmonth A Potter K Bettinson E Lingard 2008 Patient-reported outcomes after fixed- versus mobile-bearing total knee replacement: a multi-centre randomised controlled trial using the Kinemax total knee replacement J Bone Joint Surg Br 90 9 1172 1179 10.1302/0301-620X.90B9.21031 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1crntFOluw%3D%3D 18757956
24. D Biau MM Mullins T Judet P Piriou 2006 Mobile versus fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: mid-term comparative clinical results of 216 prostheses Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14 10 927 933 10.1007/s00167-006-0070-5 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28rot1Orsg%3D%3D 16565879 (Pubitemid 44496629)
25. Cheng K, Ridley D, Bird J, McLeod G (2009) Patients with fixed flexion deformity after total knee arthroplasty do just as well as those without: ten-year prospective data. Int Orthop. doi: 10.1007/s00264-009-0801-6
26. JM Bert 1990 Dislocation/subluxation of meniscal bearing elements after New Jersey low-contact stress total knee arthroplasty Clin Orthop Relat Res 254 211 215 2323133
27. JK Weaver RS Derkash AS Greenwald 1993 Difficulties with bearing dislocation and breakage using a movable bearing total knee replacement system Clin Orthop Relat Res 290 244 252 8472455