Predictability of intraocular lens calculation and early refractive status: The infant aphakia treatment study

Archives of Ophthalmology

Volumn 130, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 293-299

  VanderVeen, Deborah K ^a   Nizam, Azhar ^b   Lynn, Michael J ^b   Bothun, Erick D ^d   McClatchey, Scott K ^e,f,g   Weakley, David R ^h   DuBois, Lindreth G ^c   Lambert, Scott R ^c  

^a BOSTON CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^e NAVAL MEDICAL CENTER SAN DIEGO   (United States)

^f UNIFORMED SERVICES UNIVERSITY OF THE HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

^g LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

A SCAN; APHAKIA; ARTICLE; BIOMETRY; CONGENITAL CATARACT; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE REFRACTION; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INFANT; KERATOMETRY; LENS IMPLANT; LENS IMPLANTATION; LENS POWER; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTICENTER STUDY; NEWBORN; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REFRACTION ERROR; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

CATARACT; CATARACT EXTRACTION; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; HYPEROPIA; INFANT; LENS IMPLANTATION, INTRAOCULAR; LENSES, INTRAOCULAR; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REFRACTOMETRY; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 84858592312     PISSN: 00039950     EISSN: 15383601     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.358     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Andreo LK, Wilson ME, Saunders RA. Predictive value of regression and theoretical IOL formulas in pediatric intraocular lens implantation. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1997;34(4):240-243. (Pubitemid 27327885)
2. Mezer E, Rootman DS, Abdolell M, Levin AV. Early postoperative refractive outcomes of pediatric intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30(3):603-610. (Pubitemid 38429636)
3. Moore DB, Ben Zion I, Neely DE, et al. Accuracy of biometry in pediatric cataract extraction with primary intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(11):1940-1947.
4. Neely DE, Plager DA, Borger SM, Golub RL. Accuracy of intraocular lens calculations in infants and children undergoing cataract surgery. J AAPOS. 2005;9(2):160-165. (Pubitemid 40544892)
5. Nihalani BR, VanderVeen DK. Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation formulae in pediatric eyes. Ophthalmology. 2010;117(8):1493-1499.
6. Tromans C, Haigh PM, Biswas S, Lloyd IC. Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation in paediatric cataract surgery. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001;85(8):939-941. (Pubitemid 32706167)
7. Lambert SR, Buckley EG, Drews-Botsch C, et al Infant Aphakia Treatment Study Group. The Infant Aphakia Treatment Study: design and clinical measures at enrollment. Arch Ophthalmol. 2010;128(1):21-27.
8. Lambert SR, Buckley EG, Drews-Botsch C, et al Infant Aphakia Treatment Study Group. A randomized clinical trial comparing contact lens with intraocular lens correction of monocular aphakia during infancy: grating acuity and adverse events at age 1 year. Arch Ophthalmol. 2010;128(7):810-818.
9. Eibschitz-Tsimhoni M, Tsimhoni O, Archer SM, Del Monte MA. Effect of axial length and keratometry measurement error on intraocular lens implant power prediction formulas in pediatric patients. J AAPOS. 2008;12(2):173-176. (Pubitemid 351514938)
10. Norrby S. Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(3):368-376. (Pubitemid 351625583)
11. Olsen T, Nielsen PJ. Immersion versus contact technique in the measurement of axial length by ultrasound. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1989;67(1):101-102. (Pubitemid 19110462)
12. Schelenz J, Kammann J. Comparison of contact and immersion techniques for axial length measurement and implant power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1989;15(4):425-428. (Pubitemid 19193480)
13. Trivedi RH, Wilson ME. Prediction error after pediatric cataract surgery with intraocular lens implantation: contact versus immersion A-scan biometry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37(3):501-505.
14. Hennessy MP, Franzco, Chan DG. Contact versus immersion biometry of axial length before cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29(11):2195-2198. (Pubitemid 37548765)
15. Ben-Zion I, Neely DE, Plager DA, Ofner S, Sprunger DT, Roberts GJ. Accuracy of IOL calculations in children: a comparison of immersion versus contact A-scan biometery. J AAPOS. 2008;12(5):440-444.
16. McClatchey SK, Hofmeister EM. The optics of aphakic and pseudophakic eyes in childhood. Surv Ophthalmol. 2010;55(2):174-182.
17. Hoffer KJ. The Hoffer Q formula: a comparison of theoretic and regression formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1993;19(6):700-712. (Pubitemid 23330015)
18. Holladay JT. Standardizing constants for ultrasonic biometry, keratometry, and intraocular lens power calculations. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1997;23(9):1356-1370. (Pubitemid 27524543)
19. MacLaren RE, Natkunarajah M, Riaz Y, Bourne RR, Restori M, Allan BD. Biometry and formula accuracy with intraocular lenses used for cataract surgery in extreme hyperopia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143(6):920-931.
20. Eibschitz-Tsimhoni M, Tsimhoni O, Archer SM, Del Monte MA. Discrepancies between intraocular lens implant power prediction formulas in pediatric patients. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(2):383-386. (Pubitemid 46161791)
21. Boisvert C, Beverly DT, McClatchey SK. Theoretical strategy for choosing piggy-back intraocular lens powers in young children. J AAPOS. 2009;13(6):555-557.
22. Hutchinson AK, Wilson ME, Saunders RA. Outcomes and ocular growth rates after intraocular lens implantation in the first 2 years of life. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998;24(6):846-852. (Pubitemid 28303027)
23. Gale RP, Saldana M, Johnston RL, Zuberbuhler B, McKibbin M. Benchmark standards for refractive outcomes after NHS cataract surgery. Eye (Lond). 2009;23(1):149-152.