Discrepancies between Intraocular Lens Implant Power Prediction Formulas in Pediatric Patients

Ophthalmology

Volumn 114, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 383-386

  Eibschitz Tsimhoni, Maya ^a   Tsimhoni, Omer ^b   Archer, Steven M ^a   Del Monte, Monte A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EYE AXIS LENGTH; EYE REFRACTION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KERATOMETRY; LENS IMPLANT; LENS POWER; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PEDIATRICS; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADOLESCENT; CATARACT; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; HUMANS; INFANT; LENS IMPLANTATION, INTRAOCULAR; LENSES, INTRAOCULAR; MATHEMATICS; OPTICS; REFRACTION, OCULAR;

EID: 33846517354     PISSN: 01616420     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.06.063     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Eibschitz-Tsimhoni M, Archer SM, Del Monte MA. Intraocular 1ens power calculation in children. Surv Ophthalmol. In press.
2. Mezer E., Rootman D.S., Abdolell M., and Levin A.V. Early postoperative refractive outcomes of pediatric intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 30 (2004) 603-610
3. Andreo L.K., Wilson M.E., and Saunders R.A. Predictive value of regression and theoretical IOL formulas in pediatric intraocular lens implantation. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 34 (1997) 240-243
4. Lambert S.R., Lynn M., Drews-Botsch C., et al. Intraocular lens implantation during infancy: perceptions of parents and the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus members. J AAPOS 7 (2003) 400-405
5. Sanders D.R., Retzlaff J., and Kraff M.C. Comparison of the SRK II formula and the other second generation formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg 14 (1988) 136-141
6. Holladay J.T., Prager T.C., Chandler T.Y., et al. A three-part system for refining intraocular lens power calculations. J Cataract Refract Surg 14 (1988) 17-24
7. Hoffer K.J. The Hoffer Q formula: a comparison of theoretical and regression formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg 19 (1993) 700-712
8. Retzlaff J., Sanders D.R., and Kraff M.C. Development of the SRK/T intraocular lens implant power calculation formula. J Cataract Refract Surg 16 (1990) 333-340
9. University-Augenklinik Würzburg. Department of Echography. IOL calculation according to HAIGIS. Available at: http://www.augenklinik.uni-wuerzburg.de/uslab/ioltxt/haie.htm. Accessed June 4, 2006.
10. University-Augenklinik Würzburg. ULIB: user group for laser interference biometry. Optimized IOL constants for the ZEISS IOL Master calculated from patient data on file (as of May 23, 2006). Available at: http://www.augenklinik.uni-wuerzburg.de/ulib/c1.htm. Accessed June 4, 2006.
11. Wilson M.E. Intraocular lens implantation: has it become the standard of care for children?. Ophthalmology 103 (1996) 1719-1720
12. Wilson M.E., Bluestein E.C., and Wang X.H. Current trends in the use of intraocular lenses in children. J Cataract Refract Surg 20 (1994) 579-583
13. Superstein R., Archer S.M., and Del Monte M.A. Minimal myopic shift in pseudophakia versus aphakic pediatric cataract patients. J AAPOS 6 (2002) 271-276
14. Gordon R.A., and Donzis P.B. Refractive development of the human eye. Arch Ophthalmol 103 (1985) 785-789
15. Flitcroft D.I., Knight-Nanan D., Bowell R., et al. Intraocular lenses in children: changes in axial length, corneal curvature, and refraction. Br J Ophthalmol 83 (1999) 265-269
16. Neely D.E., Plager D.A., Borger B.A., and Golub R.L. Accuracy of intraocular lens calculations in infants and children undergoing cataract surgery. J AAPOS 9 (2005) 160-165