D-LTAG: Extending lexicalized TAG to discourse

Cognitive Science

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 751-779

  Webber, Bonnie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Anaphora; Discourse connectives; Discourse parsing; Discourse structure; Lexicalized grammar

Indexed keywords

EID: 13944283417     PISSN: 03640213     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cogsci.2004.04.002     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Asher N. Reference to abstract objects in discourse 1993 Kluwer Boston, MA
2. Asher N. Lascarides A. The semantics and pragmatics of presupposition Journal of Semantics 15 3 1998 239-300
3. Bangalore S. Joshi A. Supertagging: An approach to almost parsing Computational Linguistics 25 2 1999 237-265
4. Carlson L. Marcu D. Okurowski M.E. Building a discourse-tagged corpus in the framework of rhetorical structure theory. In Proceedings of the second SIGdial workshop on discourse and dialogue 2002
5. Clark S. Hockenmaier J. Evaluating a wide-coverage CCG parser. In Proceedings of the LREC workshop on beyond Parseval 2002 60-66
6. Creswell C. Forbes K. Miltsakaki E. Prasad R. Joshi A. Webber B. The discourse anaphoric properties of connectives. In Proceedings of the discourse anaphora and anaphor resolution colloquium 2002
7. Cristea D. Webber B. Expectations in incremental discourse processing. In Proceedings of the 35th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL97/EACL97) 1997 88-95
8. Di Eugenio B. Jordan P.W. Moore J.D. Thomason R.H. An empirical investigation of proposals in collaborative dialogues. In Proceedings of COLING/ACL'98 1998 325-329
9. Forbes, K. (2003). Discourse semantics of s-modifying adverbials. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania
10. Forbes K. Miltsakaki E. Prasad R. Sarkar A. Joshi A. Webber B. D-LTAG system-Discourse parsing with a lexicalized tree-adjoining grammar. In ESSLLI'2001 workshop on information structure, discourse structure and discourse semantics 2001
11. Forbes K. Webber B. A semantic account of adverbials as discourse connectives. In Proceedings of third SIGDial workshop 2002 27-36
12. Forbes-Riley, K., Webber, B., & Joshi, A. (in press). Computing discourse semantics: The predicate-argument semantics of discourse connectives in D-LTAG. Journal of Semantics
13. Gardent, C. (1997). Discourse tree adjoining grammars. Claus report no. 89, University of the Saarland, Saarbrücken
14. Grosz B. Sidner C. Attention, intention and the structure of discourse Computational Linguistics 12 3 1986 175-204
15. Hockenmaier J. Steedman M. Generative models for statistical parsing with combinatory categorial grammar. In Proceedings of 40th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics 2002
16. Hovy E. Generating natural language under pragmatic constraints 1988 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Hillsdale, NJ
17. Joshi A. An introduction to Tree Adjoining Grammar. In A. Manaster-Ramer (Ed.), Mathematics of language 1987 John Benjamins Amsterdam 87-114
18. Kingsbury P. Palmer M. From TreeBank to PropBank. In Proceedings of the third international conference on language resources and evalution (LREC) 2002
19. Kiparsky P. Kiparsky. In C. Fact M. Bierwisch K.E. Heidolph (Eds.). Progress in linguistics 1970 Mouton 143-173
20. Knott A. Oberlander J. O'Donnell M. Mellish C. Beyond elaboration: The interaction of relations and focus in coherent text. In T. Sanders J. Schilperoord W. Spooren (Eds.). Text representation: Linguistic and psycholinguistic aspects 2001 John Benjamins 181-196
21. Linde, C. (1974). The linguistic encoding of spatial information. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Linguistics, Columbia University
22. Mann W. Thompson S. Rhetorical structure theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization Las Palmas Text 8 3 1988 243-281
23. Marcu, D. (1999). Instructions for manually annotating the discourse structure of texts Available at http://www.isi.edu/marcu/software/manual.ps.gz. Accessed on 28 May 2004
24. Marcu D. The theory and practice of discourse parsing and summarization 2000 MIT Press
25. McKeown K. Text generation: Using discourse strategies and focus constraints to generate natural language texts 1985 Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK
26. Melcuk I. Dependency syntax: Theory and practice 1988 State University of New York Albany, NY
27. Meyers A. Reeves R. Macleod C. Szekely R. Zilinska V. Young B. et al. The NomBank project: An interim report. In NAACL/HLT workshop on frontiers in corpus annotation 2004
28. Miltsakaki E. Creswell C. Forbes K. Joshi A. Webber B. Anaphoric arguments of discourse connectives: Semantic properties of antecedents versus non-antecedents. In EACL workshop on computational treatment of anaphora 2003
29. Miltsakaki E. Prasad R. Joshi A. Webber B. Annotating discourse connectives and their arguments. In NAACL/HLT workshop on frontiers of corpus annotation 2003
30. Moore J. Participating in explanatory dialogues 1990 MIT Press Boston, MA
31. Moser M. Moore J. Toward a synthesis of two accounts of discourse structure Boston, MA Computational Linguistics 22 3 1996 409-419
32. Polanyi L. van den Berg M.H. Discourse structure and discourse interpretation. In P. Dekker M. Stokhof (Eds.). Proceedings of the 10th Amsterdam colloquium 1996 University of Amsterdam 113-131
33. Prasad R., Miltsakaki, E., Joshi, A., & Webber, B. (2004). Annotation and data mining of the Penn Discourse TreeBank. In Proceedings of ACL/EACL Workshop on Discourse Annotation (pp. 88-95)
34. Quirk R. Greenbaum S. Leech G. Svartik J. A grammar of contemporary English 1972 Longman Harlow
35. Sarkar A. Practical experiments in parsing using tree-adjoining grammars. In Proceedings of the fifth TAG+ workshop 2000 193-198
36. Scha R. Polanyi L. An augmented context free grammar for discourse. In Proceedings of the 12th international conference on computational linguistics (COLING'88) 1988 573-577
37. Schabes, Y. (1990). Mathematical and computational aspects of lexicalized grammars. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania
38. Schilder F. Tree discourse grammar, or how to get attached to a discourse. In Proceedings of the second international workshop on computational semantics 1997
39. Sibun P. Generating text without trees Computational Intelligence 8 1 1992 102-122
40. Soon W.M. Ng H.T. Lim D. A machine learning approach to coreference resolution of noun phrases Computational Linguistics 27 4 2001 521-544
41. Stede M. The Potsdam commentary corpus. In ACL workshop on discourse annotation 2004, July
42. Steedman M. Surface structure and interpretation 1996 MIT Press Cambridge, MA
43. Steedman M. Information structure and the syntax-phonology interface Linguistic Inquiry 34 2000 649-689
44. Webber B. Structure and ostension in the interpretation of discourse deixis Language and Cognitive Processes 6 2 1991 107-135
45. Webber B. Joshi A. Anchoring a lexicalized tree-adjoining grammar for discourse. In Coling/ACL workshop on discourse relations and discourse markers 1998 86-92
46. Webber B. Joshi A. Knott A. The anaphoric nature of certain discourse connectives. In Making sense: From Lexeme to discourse 2000
47. Webber B. Knott A. Joshi A. Multiple discourse connectives in a lexicalized grammar for discourse. In H. Bunt R. Muskens E. Thijsse (Eds.). Computing meaning Vol. 2 2001 Kluwer 229-249
48. Webber B. Knott A. Stone M. Joshi A. Discourse relations: A structural and presuppositional account using lexicalized TAG. In Proceedings of the 36th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics 1999 41-48
49. Webber B. Knott A. Stone M. Joshi A. What are little trees made of: A structural and presuppositional account using lexicalized TAG. In Proceedings of international workshop on levels of representation in discourse (LORID'99) 1999 151-156
50. Webber B. Stone M. Joshi A. Knott A. Anaphora and discourse structure Computational Linguistics 29 4 2003 545-587
51. Xia F. Palmer M. Joshi A. A uniform method of grammar extraction and its applications. In Proceedings of the SIGDAT conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (EMNLP) 2000
52. XTAG-Group. (2001). A lexicalized tree adjoining grammar for EnglishTech. Rep. IRCS 01-03, University of Pennsylvania, available at ftp://ftp.cis.upenn.edu/pub/ircs/technical-reports/01-03, accessed on 28 May 2004