Stressed yet Motivated: Web-based peer assessed competition as an instructional approach in higher education

Learning in the Disciplines: ICLS 2010 Conference Proceedings - 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences

Volumn 1, Issue , 2010, Pages 65-72

  Hammer, Ronen ^a   Ronen, Miky ^a   Kohen Vacs, Dan ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HIGHER EDUCATION; HIGHLY-CORRELATED; ONLINE ACTIVITIES; PEER ASSESSMENT; PERSONALITY TRAITS; WEB-BASED ENVIRONMENT;

WEBSITES;

STUDENTS;

EID: 84858427409     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Cramer, S., Kurten, J. (2005). Inspire Future Engineers with the Concrete Canoe Competition. Tech Directions, 65 (4), 17-19.
2. Casile, M. & Wheeler, J. V. (2005). The Magnetic Sentences Industry Game: A Competitive In-Class Experience of Business-Level Strategy. Journal of Management Education, 29(5), 696-713.
3. Cole, M. (1996). Culture in mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4. Conroy D. E., Willow J. P., Metzler J. N. (2002). Multidimensional Fear of Failure Measurement: The Performance Failure Appraisal Inventory. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 14 (2), 76-90.
5. Corner, P. D., Bowden, S., Clark, D., Collins, E., Gibb, J., Kearins, K., Pavlovich, K. (2006). Grounded Learning from a Strategy Case Competition. Journal of Management Education, 30(3), 431-454.
6. Covington, M. V., & Wiedenhaupt, S. (1997). Turning work into play: The nature and nurturing of intrinsic task engagement. In R. P. Perry & J. C. Smart, (Eds.), Effective teaching in higher education: Research and practice, (pp. 101-114). Agathon Press, New York.
7. Dodge, B. (1995). !WebQuests: A technique for Internet-based learning. Distance Educator, 1(2), 10-13.
8. Dodge, B. (2001). A Rubric for Evaluating WebQuests. Retrieved October 12, 2009 from http://webquest.sdsu.edu/webquestrubric.html
9. Falchikov, N. (2003). Involving students in assessment. Psychology Learning and Teaching, 3(2), 102-108.
10. Falchikov, N., & Goldfinch, J. (2000). Student Peer Assessment in Higher Education: A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Review of Educational Researc, 70(3), 287-322.
11. Fu, F.L., Wu, Y.L., Ho, H.C. (2009). An Investigation of CoOpetitive Pedagogic Design for Knowledge Creation in Web-Based Learning. Computers & Education, 53(3), 550-562.
12. Kali, Y., & Ronen M. (2008). Assessing the assessors: Added value in web-based multi-cycle peer assessment in higher education, Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 3(1), 3-32.
13. Ke, F., & Grabowski, B. (2007). Game playing for Math learning: Cooperative or not? British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(2), 249-259.
14. Kinzie, M.B., Hrabe, M.E., Larsen, V. A. (1998). An Instructional Design Case Event: Exploring Issues in Professional Practice. Educational Technology Research and Development, 46(1), 53-71.
15. Kohn, A. (1992). Resistance to Cooperative Learning: Making Sense of Its Deletion and Dilution. Journal of Education, (174)2, 38-56.
16. Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. McClelland, D. C. (1961). Methods of Measuring Human Motivation, in J.W. Atkinson, (ed.), The Achieving Society, pp. 41-43. Princeton, N.J.
18. Muse, L. A., Harris, S. G., & Feild, S. H. (2003). Has the Inverted-U Theory of Stress and Job Performance Had a Fair Test? Human Performance, 16(4), 349-364.
19. Nemerow, L.G. (1996). Do Classroom Games Improve Motivation and Learning? Teaching and Change, 3 (4), 356-566.
20. Ronen, M., Kohen-Vacs, D. & Raz-Fogel, N. (2006). Adopt & Adapt: Structuring, Sharing and Reusing Asynchronous Collaborative Pedagogy. In Barab, S., Hay, K., & Hickey., D. (Eds), Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Learning sciences (pp. 599-606). International Society of the Learning Sciences (ISLS).
21. Rowland, G. (1994). Educating Instructional Designers: Different Methods for Different Outcomes. Educational Technology, 34(6), 5-11.
22. Sansalone, M. (1990). Teaching Structural Concepts through Case Studies and Competitions. Engineering Education, 80(4), 472-475.
23. Slavin, R. E. (1980). Cooperative learning. Review of Educational Research, 50(2), 315-342.
24. Slavin, R. E., Leavey, M. B., & Madden, N. A. (1984). Combining cooperative learning and individualized instruction: Effects on student mathematics achievement, attitudes, and behaviors. The Elementary School Journal, 84(4), 408-422.
25. Smith, H., Cooper, A., & Lancaster, L. (2002). Improving the quality of undergraduate peer assessment: A case for student and staff development. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39(1), 71-81.
26. White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R. (2000). Technological tools and instructional approaches for making scientific inquiry accessible to all. In M. J. Jacobson & R. B. Kozma (Eds.), Innovation in science and mathematics education (pp. 321-35). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.