Competent Enough, But Would You Vote for Her? Gender Stereotypes and Media Influences on Perceptions of Women Politicians

Journal of Applied Social Psychology

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 560-597

  Bligh, Michelle C ^a   Schlehofer, Michèle M ^b   Casad, Bettina J ^c   Gaffney, Amber M ^a  

^a CLAREMONT GRADUATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SALISBURY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c CALIFORNIA STATE POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84858401665     PISSN: 00219029     EISSN: 15591816     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00781.x     Document Type: Article

References (96)

1. Adler, N. J., & Izraeli, D. N. (1994). Competitive frontiers: Women managers in a global economy. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
2. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. London: Sage.
3. Alexander, D., & Anderson, K. (1993). Gender as a factor in the attribution of leadership traits. Political Research Quarterly, 46, 527-545.
4. Ashmore, R. D., Del Boca, F. K., & Bilder, S. M. (1995). Construction and validation of the Gender Attitude Inventory, a structured inventory to assess multiple dimensions of gender attitudes. Sex Roles, 32, 753-785.
5. Bem, S. L. (1987). Probing the promise of androgyny. In M. R. Walsh (Ed.), The psychology of women (pp. 206-225). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
6. Bem, S. L. (1993). The lenses of gender: Transforming the debate on sexual inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
7. th ed.). New York: Longman.
8. Biernat, M. (2003). Toward a broader view of social stereotyping. American Psychologist, 58, 1019-1027.
9. th terrorist attacks. Leadership Quarterly, 15, 211-239.
10. Bligh, M. C., Kohles, J. C., & Pillai, R. (2005). Crisis and charisma in the California recall election. Leadership, 1, 323-352.
11. Braden, M. (1996). Women politicians and the media. Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky Press.
12. Branscombe, N., Schmitt, M. T., & Harvey, R. (1999). Perceiving pervasive discrimination among African Americans: Implications for group identification and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7, 135-149.
13. Bystrom, D., Robertson, T., & Banwart, M. (2000). Framing the fight: An analysis of media coverage of female and male candidates in primary races for Governor and U.S. Senate in 2000. American Behavioral Scientist, 44, 1999-2013.
14. rd Congress. In P. Norris (Ed.), Women, media, and politics (pp. 131-148). New York: Oxford University Press.
15. Casad, B. J. (2007). Gender stereotype violation among job applicants: An examination of theory and measurement. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B. The Sciences and Engineering, 67, 4154.
16. Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement (CIRCLE). (2008, November). Turnout by education, race, and gender and other 2008 youth voting statistics. The Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement: Tufts University. Retrieved December 18, 2009, from.
17. Constantini, E., & Craik, K. H. (1972). Women as politicians: The social background, personality, and political careers of female party leaders. Journal of Social Issues, 28, 217-236.
18. Cuddy, A. J., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2007). The BIAS map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 631-648.
19. Deber, R. B. (1982). The fault, dear Brutus: Women as congressional candidates in Pennsylvania. Journal of Politics, 44, 463-479.
20. Deloitte & Touche. (2000). Women in elected office. New York: Author.
21. Devitt, J. (1999). Study finds differences in newspaper coverage of female and male candidates. Washington, DC: The Women's Leadership Fund.
22. Devitt, J. (2002). Framing gender on the campaign trail: Female gubernatorial candidates and the press. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 79, 445-464.
23. Diekman, A. B., Eagly, A. H., & Kulesa, P. (2002). Accuracy and bias in stereotypes about the social and political attitudes of women and men. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 268-282.
24. Dolan, K. (1996). Support for women political candidates: An examination of the role of family. Women and Politics, 16(2), 45-60.
25. Dolan, K. (1997a). Determinants of support for women Congressional candidates in the 1990s. Chicago: Midwest Political Science Association.
26. Dolan, K. (1997b). Gender differences in support for women candidates: Is there a glass ceiling in American politics? Women and Politics, 17(2), 27-41.
27. Dolan, K. (2004). Voting for women: How the public evaluates women candidates. Boulder, CO: Westview.
28. Dolan, K. (2005). Do women candidates play to gender stereotypes? Do men candidates play to women? Candidate sex and issues priorities on campaign websites. Political Research Quarterly, 58(1), 31-44.
29. Dolan, K., & Ford, L. E. (1997). Change and continuity among women state legislators: Evidence from three decades. Political Research Quarterly, 50, 137-151.
30. Duffy, M. (2008, August 29). Will women vote for Palin? Time Magazine. Retrieved March 20, 2009, from.
31. Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
32. Eagly, A. H., & Johnson, B. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 233-256.
33. Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573-598.
34. Eagly, A. H., Karau, S. J., & Makhijani, M. G. (1995). Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 125-145.
35. Eagly, A. H., Makhijani, M. G., & Klonsky, B. G. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 3-22.
36. Eckes, T. (2002). Paternalistic and envious gender stereotypes: Testing predictions from the stereotype content model. Sex Roles, 47, 99-114.
37. Falk, E., & Kenski, K. (2006). Issue saliency and gender stereotypes: Support for women as Presidents in times of war and terrorism. Social Science Quarterly, 87, 1-18.
38. Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902.
39. Forsyth, D. R., Heiney, M. M., & Wright, S. S. (1997). Biases in appraisals of women leaders. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1, 98-103.
40. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109-118.
41. Glick, P., Wilk, K., & Perreault, M. (1995). Images of occupations: Components of gender and status in occupational stereotypes. Sex Roles, 32, 565-582.
42. Hansen, C. H., & Hansen, R. D. (1988). How rock music videos can change what is seen when boy meets girl: Priming stereotypic appraisal of social interaction. Sex Roles, 19, 287-316.
43. Hansen, C. H., & Krygowski, W. (1994). Arousal-augmented priming effects: Rock music videos and sex object schemas. Communication Research, 21, 24-47.
44. Hedlund, R. D., Freeman, P. K., Hamm, K. E., & Stein, R. M. (1979). The electability of women candidates: The effects of sex role stereotypes. Journal of Politics, 41, 513-524.
45. Heflick, N. A., & Goldenberg, J. L. (2009). Objectifying Sarah Palin: Evidence that objectification causes women to be perceived as less competent and less fully human. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 598-601.
46. Huddy, L., & Terkildsen, N. (1993). The consequences of gender stereotypes for women candidates at different levels and types of office. Political Research Quarterly, 46(3), 503-525.
47. Inter-Parliamentary Union. (2006). Women in politics: 60 years in retrospect. Retrieved March 23, 2009, from.
48. Jacobs, T. (2009, March 4). Sex appeal may have hurt Sarah Palin. Miller-McCune. Retrieved March 25, 2009, from.
49. Jamieson, K. H. (1995). Beyond the double bind: Women and leadership. New York: Oxford University Press.
50. Jones, J. M. (2009, January 28). State of the states: Political party affiliation. Gallup. Retrieved March 25, 2009, from.
51. Kahn, K. F. (1994). The distorted mirror: Press coverage of women candidates for statewide office. Journal of Politics, 56, 154-173.
52. Kahn, K. F. (1996). The political consequences of being a woman. New York: Columbia University Press.
53. Kahn, K. F., & Goldenberg, E. (1991). Women candidates in the news: An examination of gender differences in U.S. Senate campaign coverage. Public Opinion Quarterly, 55, 18-99.
54. Kahn, K. F., & Gordon, A. (1997). How women campaign for the U.S. Senate. In P. Norris (Ed.), Women, media, and politics (pp. 59-76). New York: Oxford University Press.
55. Kathlene, L. (1989). Uncovering the political impacts of gender: An exploratory study. Western Political Quarterly, 42, 397-421.
56. Kittilson, M. C., & Fridkin, K. (2008). Gender, candidate portrayals, and election campaigns: A comparative perspective. Politics and Gender, 4, 371-392.
57. Koch, J. W. (1999). Candidate gender and assessments of Senate candidates. Social Science Quarterly, 80, 84-96.
58. Koch, J. W. (2000). Do citizens apply gender stereotypes to infer candidates' ideological orientations? Journal of Politics, 62, 414-429.
59. Krosnick, J. A., & Kinder, D. R. (1990). Altering the foundations of support for the President through priming. American Political Science Review, 84, 497-512.
60. Matland, R., & King, G. (2002). Women as candidates in Congressional elections. In C. Rosenthal (Ed.), Women transforming Congress (pp. 119-145). Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
61. Maurer, T. J., & Lord, R. G. (1991). An exploration of cognitive demands in group interaction as a moderator of information-processing variables in perceptions of leadership. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 821-839.
62. M. B. B. (2007). CNN's, ABC's Beck on Clinton: "[S]he's the stereotypical bitch." Retrieved April 29, 2008, from.
63. Niemi, R., & Hanmer, M. (2004). College students in the 2004 election (CIRCLE: Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement). College Park, MD: University of Maryland Press.
64. Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. D. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
65. Norris, P. (1996). Women leaders worldwide: A splash of color in the photo op. In P. Norris (Ed.), Women, media, and politics (pp. 149-165). New York: Oxford University Press.
66. Perry, T. (2002, June 17). Farmers oppose call to idle land agriculture: Tempers flare in Imperial Valley as a U.S. deadline nears to cut use of Colorado River water. Los Angeles Times, p. B-1.
67. Pillai, R., Stites Doe, S., Grewal, D., & Meindl, J. R. (1997). Winning charisma and losing the Presidential election. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 1716-1726.
68. Pillai, R., Kohles, J. C., & Bligh, M. C. (2007). Through thick and thin? Follower constructions of Presidential leadership amidst crises, 2001-2005. In B. Shamir, R. Pillai, M. C. Bligh, & M. Uhl-Bien (Eds.), Follower-centered perspectives on leadership: A tribute to the memory of James R. Meindl (pp. 135-165). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
69. Pillai, R., & Williams, E. A. (1998). Does leadership matter in the political arena? Voter perceptions of candidates' transformational and charismatic leadership and the 1996 U.S. Presidential vote. Leadership Quarterly, 9, 397-416.
70. Pillai, R., Willliams, E. A., Lowe, K. B., & Jung, D. I. (2003). Personality, transformational leadership, trust, and the 2000 U.S. Presidential vote. Leadership Quarterly, 14, 161-192.
71. rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
72. Power, J. G., Murphy, S. T., & Coover, G. (1996). Priming prejudice: How stereotypes and counterstereotypes influence attribution of responsibility and credibility among in-groups and out-groups. Human Communication Research, 23, 36-58.
73. Rahn, W. M. (1993). The role of partisan stereotypes in information-processing about political candidates. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 472-496.
74. RePass, D. E. (1971). Issue salience and party choice. American Political Science Review, 65, 389-400.
75. Robinson, G., & Saint-Jean, A. (1995). The portrayal of women politicians in the media. In F. P. Gingras (Ed.), Gendered politics in contemporary Canada (pp. 112-155). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Oxford University Press.
76. Romano, L. (2006, July 13). Beyond the poll numbers: Voter doubts about Clinton. Washington Post, p. A01.
77. Rosenwasser, S. M., & Dean, N. G. (1989). Gender role and political office. Effects of perceived masculinity/femininity of candidate and political office. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13, 77-85.
78. Rudman, L. A. (1998). Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 629-645.
79. Rudman, L. A., & Fairchild, K. (2004). Reactions to counterstereotypic behavior: The role of backlash in cultural stereotype maintenance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 157-176.
80. Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (1999). Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: The hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle managers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1004-1010.
81. Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 743-762.
82. Sanbonmatsu, K. (2003). Political knowledge and gender stereotypes. American Political Research, 31, 575-594.
83. Schein, V. E. (2001). A global look at psychological barriers to women's progress in management. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 675-688.
84. Schmader, T., Major, B., & Gramzow, R. (2001). Coping with ethnic stereotypes in the academic domain: Perceived injustice and psychological disengagement. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 93-112.
85. Schuessler, K., Hittle, D., & Cardascia, J. (1978). Measuring responding desirably with attitude-opinion items. Social Psychology, 41, 224-235.
86. Seelye, K. Q., & Bosman, J. (2008, June 13). Media charged with sexism in Clinton coverage. New York Times. Retrieved December 22, 2008, from.
87. Shamir, B. (1995). Social distance and charisma: Theoretical notes and an exploratory study. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 19-47.
88. Sigelman, L., Sigelman, C. K., & Fowler, C. (1987). A bird of a different feather? An experimental investigation of physical attractiveness and the electability of female candidates. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50, 32-43.
89. Skitka, L. J., & Robideau, R. R. (1997). Judging a book by its cover: The effect of candidate party label and issue stands on voting behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 967-982.
90. th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
91. Tankard, J. W. (2001). The empirical approach to the study of media framing. In S. Reese, O. Gandy, & A. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and understanding of the social world (pp. 95-106). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
92. Thompson, S. C., & Schlehofer, M. M. (2008). Control, denial, and heightened sensitivity reactions to personal threat: Testing the generalizability of the threat orientation approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1070-1083.
93. Thompson, S. C., Schlehofer, M. M., & Bovin, M. J. (2006). The measurement of threat orientations. American Journal of Health Behavior, 30, 147-157.
94. White, M. J., Kruczek, T. A., Brown, M. T., & White, G. B. (1989). Occupational sex stereotypes among college students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 34, 289-298.
95. Wiebe, D. J., & Korbel, C. (2003). Defensive denial, affect, and the self-regulation of health threats. In L. D. Cameron & H. Leventhal (Eds.), The self-regulation of health and illness behavior (pp. 184-203). New York: Routledge.
96. Witt, L., Paget, K. M., & Matthews, G. (1995). Running as a woman: Gender and power in American politics. New York: Free Press.