Winning charisma and losing the presidential election

Journal of Applied Social Psychology

Volumn 27, Issue 19, 1997, Pages 1716-1726

  Pillai, Rajnandini ^a,d   Grewal, Dhruv ^a   Stites Doe, Susan ^b   Meindl, James R ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI   (United States)

^b STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 18244373956     PISSN: 00219029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb01621.x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1989). Manual: The Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists.
2. Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1993). Transformational leadership: A response to critiques. In M. M. Chemers & R. Ayman (Eds.), Leadership theory and research: Perspectives and directions (pp. 49-80). San Diego, CA: Academic.
3. Binning, J. F., Zaba, A. J., & Whattam, J. C. (1986). Explaining the biasing effects of performance cues in terms of cognitive categorization. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 521-535.
4. Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York, NY: Academic.
5. Butterfield, A., & Prasad, A. (1990, May). Leadership and the 1988 Presidential Election: A gallup "phrase portrait" view. Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of the Eastern Academy of Management, Buffalo, NY.
6. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
7. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row Peterson.
8. Grenberg, D., & Nanneman, T. (1986). Attitude change in an electoral context as a function of expectations not being fulfilled. Political Psychology, 7, 753-765.
9. Janis, I. L., & Mann, L. (1977). Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment. New York, NY: Free Press.
10. Kinder, D. R., & Sears, D. (1985). Public opinion and political action. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 659-671 ). New York, NY: Random House.
11. Lord, R. G. (1985). An information processing approach to social perceptions, leadership and behavioral measurement in organizations. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 7, pp. 87-128). Greenwich, CT: JAL
12. Mann, L., & Abeles, R. P. (1970). Evaluation of presidential candidates as a function of time and stage of voting decision. Journal of Psychology, 74, 167-173.
13. Maurer, T. J., Maher, K., Ashe, D. K., Mitchell, D. R. D., Hein, M. B., & Van Hein, J. (1993). Leadership perceptions in relation to a presidential vote. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 959-979.
14. Miller, A. H., Wattenberg, M. P., & Malanchuk, O. (1986). Schematic assessments of presidential candidates. American Political Science Review, 80, 521-539.
15. Phillips, J. S., & Lord, R. G. (1981). Causal attributions and perceptions of leadership. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 28, 143-163.
16. Pillai, R., & Meindl, J. R. (1991). The effect of a crisis on the emergence of charismatic leadership: A laboratory study. Best Paper Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management (pp. 235-239), Miami, FL.
17. Rosenfeld, P., Kennedy, J. G., & Giacalone, R. A. (1986). Decision making: A demonstration of the postdecision dissonance effect. Journal of Social Psychology, 126, 663-665.
18. Shamir, B. (1994). Ideological position, leaders' charisma and voting preferences: Personal vs. partisan elections. Political Behavior, 16, 265-287.
19. Staw, B. M. (1975). Attributions of the "cause" of performance: A general alternative interpretation of cross-sectional research on organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 414-432.
20. Winter, D. G. (1987). Leader appeal, leader performance, and the motive profiles of leaders and followers: A study of American presidents and elections. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 196-202.