Effects of space allocation and housing density on measures of wellbeing in laboratory mice: A review

Laboratory Animals

Volumn 46, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 3-13

  Whittaker, A L ^a   Howarth, G S ^a,b   Hickman, D L ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^b WOMEN S AND CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^c INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Density; Mice; Refinement; Space; Welfare

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL FOOD; ANIMAL HEALTH; ANIMAL HOUSING; ANIMAL HOUSING DENSITY; ANIMAL HOUSING SPACE ALLOCATION; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; ANIMAL USE; ANIMAL WELLBEING; BEHAVIOR; BODY SIZE; CAGE; EXPERIMENTAL ANIMAL WELFARE; EXPERIMENTAL MOUSE; MALE ANIMAL; MORTALITY; NONHUMAN; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION SIZE; PREDATION; PRODUCTIVITY; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; REVIEW; SPACE; STRESS;

ANIMAL WELFARE; ANIMALS; HOUSING, ANIMAL; MICE; POPULATION DENSITY; SEX DISTRIBUTION; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SPATIAL BEHAVIOR;

ANIMALIA; MUS;

EID: 84858400498     PISSN: 00236772     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/la.2011.011049     Document Type: Review

References (82)

1. Institute for Laboratory Animal Research. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. 8th edn. Washington DC: National Academies Press, 2010
2. EC Directive 2010/63/EC. Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Protection of Animals Used for Scientific Purposes. 2010. See http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2010:276:0033:0079:EN:PDF (last checked 3 April 2011)
3. National Health and Medical Research Council. Australian Code of Practice for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes. 7th edn. Canberra: Australian Government, 2004
4. Science Council of Japan. Guidelines for Proper Conduct of Animal Experiments. 2006. See http://www.scj.go.jp/ja/info/kohyo/pdf/kohyo-20-k16-2e.pdf (last checked 3 April 2011)
5. Council of Europe. Resolution on the accommodation and care of laboratory animals adopted by the Multilateral Consultation on May 30, 1997. See http://www.coe.int/t/e/legal_affairs/legal_co-operation/biological_safety_and_use_of_animals/laboratory_animals/Res%20accommodation.asp (last checked 31 October 2011)
6. Rodent Refinement Working Party. Refining rodent husbandry: the mouse. Lab Anim 1998;32:233-59
7. Animals (Scientific) Procedures Act 1986. Code of Practice for the Housing and Care of Animals Used in Scientific Procedures. Home Office, 1989. See http://www.official-documents.gov.uk/document/hc8889/hc01/0107/0107.pdf (last checked 31 October 2011)
8. Animal (Scientific) Procedures Act 1986. Code of Practice for the Housing and Care of Animals in Designated Breeding and Supplying Establishments. Home Office, 1995. See http://www.official-documents.gov.uk/document/hc9495/hc01/0125/0125.pdf (last checked 4 November 2011)
9. Canadian Council on Animal Care. Guide to the Care and Use of Experimental Animals 1993;253. See http://www.ccac.ca/en/CCAC_Programs/Guidelines_Policies/PDFs/ExperimentalAnimals_GDL.pdf (last checked 3 April 2011)
10. National Advisory Commitee for Laboratory Animal Research. Guidelines on the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes. 2004. See http://www.ava.gov.sg/NR/rdonlyres/C64255C0-3933-4EBC-B869-84621A9BF682/13557/Attach3_AnimalsforScientificPurposes.PDF (last checked 3 April 2011)
11. Duncan IJH, Fraser D. Understanding animal welfare. In: Appleby MC, Hughes BO, eds. Animal Welfare. Oxon: CAB International, 1997
12. Moberg GP, Mench JA. The Biology of Animal Stress. Cambridge, MA: CABI Publishing, 2000
13. Dantzer R, Mormede P. Stress in farm animals, a need for revaluation. J Anim Sci 1983;57:6-18
14. Wiepkema PR. Indicators Relevant to Farm Animal Welfare. Brussels: Martinus Nijhoff, 1983
15. Fraser D. Understanding Animal Welfare: the Science and its Cultural Context. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2008
16. Yeates JW, Main DCJ. Assessment of positive welfare: a review. Vet J 2008;175:293-300
17. Knutson B, Burgdorf J, Panksepp J. Ultrasonic vocalisations as indices of affective states in rats. Psychol Bull 2002;128:961-77
18. Blackshaw JK, Swain AJ, Blackshaw AW, et al. The development of playful behaviour in piglets from birth to weaning in three farrowing environments. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1997;55:37-49
19. Darwin C. The Expressions of the Emotions in Man and Animals. London: Longmans, 1872
20. Wechsler B. Normal behaviour as a basis for animal welfare assessment. Anim Welf 2007;16:107-10
21. Abou-Ismail UA, Burman OHP, Nicol CJ, et al. Can sleep behaviour be used as an indicator of stress in group-housed rats (Rattus norvegicus)? Anim Welf 2007;16:185-8
22. Duncan IJH, Dawkins M. The problem of assessing 'well-being' and 'suffering' in farm animals. In: Smidt D, ed. Indicators Relevant to Farm Animal Welfare. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1983
23. Barnett JL, Hemsworth PH. The validity of physiological and behavioural measures of animal welfare. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1990;25:177-87
24. Welfare Quality - Science and Society Improving Animal Welfare. See http:// www.welfarequality.net/everyone (last checked 3 April 2011)
25. Blokhuis HJ. International cooperation in animal welfare: the Welfare Quality project. Acta Vet Scand 2008;50:S10 (abstract)
26. Botreau R, Bracke MBM, Perny P, et al. Aggregation of measures to produce an overall assessment of animal welfare. Part 2: Analysis of constraints. Animal 2007;1:1188-97
27. Botreau R, Veissier I, Perny P. Overall assessment of animal welfare: strategy adopted in Welfare Quality. Anim Welf 2009;18:363-70
28. Klein HJ, Bayne KA. Establishing a culture of care, conscience, and responsibility: adressing the improvement of scientific discovery through science-based performance standards. ILAR J 2007;48:3-11
29. Guillen J. The use of performance standards by AAALAC International to evaluate ethical review in European institutions. Lab Anim (NY) 2010;39:49-53
30. Dawkins M. Animal Suffering: the Science of Animal Welfare. London: Chapman and Hall, 1980
31. Latham N, Mason G. From house mouse to mouse house: the behavioural biology of free-living Mus musculus and its implications in the laboratory. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2004;86:261-89
32. Leppänen PK, Ravaja N, Ewalds-Kvist SBM. Twenty-three generations of mice bidirectionally selected for open-field thigmotaxis: Selection response and repeated exposure to the open field. Behav Process 2006;72:23-31
33. Kvist SBM, Selander R-K. Open-field thigmotaxis during various phases of the reproductive cycle. Scand J Psychol 1994;35:220-9
34. Alyan S, Jander R. Short-range homing in the house mouse, Mus musculus: stages in the learning of directions. Anim Behav 1994;48:285-98
35. Alyan SH. Evidence for resetting the directional component of path integration in the house mouse (Mus musculus). Ethology 1996;102:629-38
36. Silver LM. Mouse genetics: Concepts and Applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995
37. DeLong KT. Population ecology of feral house mice. Ecology 1967;48:611-34
38. Young H, Strecker RL, Emlen JT. Localization of activity in two indoor populations of house mice (Mus musculus). J Mammal 1950;31:403-10
39. Krebs C, Kenney A, Singleton G. Movements of feral house mice in agricultural landscapes. Aust J Zool 1995;43:293-302
40. Hackmann LA, Wuest PA, Barrett GW. Effects of resource partitioning on the home range of feral house mice. Acta Theriol 1980;24:425-30
41. Quadagno D. Home range size in feral house mice. J Mammal 1968;49:149-51
42. Fitzgerald B, Karl B, Moller H. Spatial organisation and ecology of a sparce population of house mice (Mus musculus) in a New Zealand forest. J Anim Ecol 1981;50:489-518
43. Chambers L, Singleton G, Krebs C. Movements and social organisation of wild house mice (Mus domesticus) in the wheatlands of northwestern Australia. J Mammal 2000;81:59-69
44. Jensen SP, Gray SJ, Hurst JL. How does habitat structure affect activity and use of space among house mice? Anim Behav 2003;66:239-50
45. Smith J, Hurst JL, Barnard CJ. Comparing behaviour in wild and laboratory strains of the house mouse: levels of comparison and functional inference. Behav Process 1994;32:79-86
46. Clubb R, Mason G. Captivity effects on wide ranging carnivores. Nature 2003;425:473-4
47. Scientific Veterinary Committee. The welfare of intensively kept pigs. 1997. See http://ec.europa.eu/food/fs/sc/oldcomm4/out17_en.pdf (last checked 31 October 2011)
48. Jetz W, Carbone C, Fulford J, et al. The scaling of animal space use. Science 2004;306:266-8
49. Stricklin WR, Gonyou HW. Housing design based on behavior and computer simulations. Animal behavior and the design of livestock and poultry systems. NRAES 1995;84:84-103
50. Brooks RM. Developing a Methodology for the Assessment of Freedom of Movement: the Influence of Spatial Parameters on Movement and Space Use in Mice (Mus musculus). PhD thesis. Department of Animal and Avian Sciences, University of Maryland: College Park, 2008
51. Olsson IAS, Dahlborn K. Improving housing conditions for laboratory mice: a review of 'environmental enrichment'. Lab Anim 2002;36:243-70
52. Jennings M, Batchelor GR, Brain PF, et al. Refining rodent husbandry: the mouse. Report of the rodent refinement working party. Lab Anim 1998;32:233-59
53. Mormède P, Andanson S, Aupérin B, et al. Exploration of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal function as a tool to evaluate animal welfare. Physiol Behav 2007;92:317-39
54. Whitaker J, Moy SS, Saville BR, et al. The effect of cage size on reproductive performance and behavior of C57BL/6 mice. Lab Anim (NY) 2007;36:32-9
55. Whitaker J, Moy SS, Godfrey V, et al. Effects of cage size and enrichment on reproductive performance and behavior in C57BL/6Tac mice. Lab Anim (NY) 2009;38:24-34
56. Davidson LP, Chedester AL, Cole MN. Effects of cage density on behavior in young adult mice. Comp Med 2007;57:355-9
57. Greenberg G. The effects of ambient temperature and population density on aggression in two inbred strains of mice, Mus musculus. Behaviour 1972;42:119-30
58. Van Loo PLP, Mol JA, Koolhaas JM, et al. Modulation of aggression in male mice: influence of group size and cage size. Physiol Behav 2001;72:675-83
59. Christian JJ. Effects of population size on the adrenal glands and reproductive organs of male mice in populations of fixed size. Am J Physiol 1955;182:292-300
60. Bronson FH. Adrenal responses to crowding in Peromyscus and C57BL/10J mice. Physiol Zool 1963;36:161-6
61. Bronson FH. Density, subordination and social timidity in Peromyscus and C57BL/I0J mice. Anim Behav 1963;11:475-9
62. Southwick CH, Bland VP. Effect of population density on adrenal glands and reproductive organs of CFW mice. Am J Physiol 1959;197:111-14
63. Chvedoff M, Clarke MR, Irisarri E, et al. Effects of housing conditions on food intake, body weight and spontaneous lesions in mice. A review of the literature and results of an 18 month study. Fd Cosmet Toxicol 1980;18:517-22
64. Peters A, Festing M. Population density and growth rate in laboratory mice. Lab Anim 1990;24:273-9
65. O'Malley J, Dambrosia JM, Davis JA. Effect of housing density on reproductive parameters and corticosterone levels in nursing mice. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci 2008;47:9-15
66. Brain PF, Nowell NW. The effects of differential grouping on endocrine function on mature male albino mice. Physiol Behav 1970;5:907-10
67. Nicholson A, Malcolm RD, Russ PL, et al. The response of C57BL/6J and BALB/cJ mice to increased housing density. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci 2009;48:740-53
68. Laber K, Veatch LM, Lopez MF, et al. Effects of housing density on weight gain, immune function, behavior, and plasma corticosterone concentrations in BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci 2008;47:16-23
69. Peng X, Lang CM, Drozdowicz CK, et al. Effect of cage population density on plasma corticosterone and peripheral lymphocyte populations of laboratory mice. Lab Anim 1989;23:302-6
70. Ortiz R, Armario A, Castellanos JM. Post-weaning differential housing and testosterone secretion in male mice. Experientia 1984;40:1428-9
71. Anton AH. Effects of group size, sex and time on organ weights, catecholamines and behavior in mice. Physiol Behav 1969;4:483-7
72. Reiss D, Wolter-Sutter A, Krezel W, et al. Effects of social crowding on emotionality and expression of hippocampal nociceptin/orphanin FQ system transcripts in mice. Behav Brain Res 2007;184:167-73
73. Fullwood S, Hicks TA, Brown JC, et al. Floor space needs for laboratory mice: C56BL/6 males in solid-bottom cages with bedding. ILAR J 1998;39:29-36
74. McGlone JJ, Anderson DL, Norman RL. Floor space needs for laboratory mice: BALB/cJ males or females in solid-bottom cages with bedding. Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci 2001;40:21-5
75. Appleby MC, Hughes BO. Animal Welfare. 1st edn. Wallingford: CAB International, 1997
76. Sherwin CM. The motivation of group-housed laboratory mice, Mus musculus, for additional space. Anim Behav 2004;67:711-17
77. Fraser AF, Broom DM. Farm Animal Behaviour and Welfare. 3rd edn. Wallingford: CAB International, 1990
78. Smith AL, Mabus SL, Stockwell JD, et al. Effects of housing density and cage floor space on C57BL/6J mice. Comp Med 2004;54:656-63
79. Smith AL, Mabus SL, Muir C, et al. Effects of housing density and cage floor space on three strains of young adult inbred mice. Comp Med 2005;55:368-76
80. Gonder JC, Laber K. A renewed look at laboratory rodent housing and management. ILAR J 2007;48:29-36
81. Goldsmith JF, Brain PF, Benton D. Effects of the duration of individual or group housing on behavioural and adrenocortical reactivity in male mice. Physiol Behav 1978;21:757-60
82. Mendl M, Burman OHP, Parker RMA, et al. Cognitive bias as an indicator of animal emotion and welfare: emerging evidence and underlying mechanisms. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2009;118:161-81