Action effects in saccade control

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 198-203

  Huestegge, Lynn ^a   Kreutzfeldt, Magali ^a  

^a RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Action effects; Eye movements; Ideomotor principle, Congruency; Saccade control

Indexed keywords

EID: 84858396988     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-011-0215-5     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Craighero, L., Fadiga, L., Rizzolatti, G., & Umiltà, C. (1999). Action for perception: A motor-visual attentional effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1673-1692.
2. Donders, F. C. (1868). Die Schnelligkeit psychischer Prozesse. Archiv für Anatomie, Physiologie und wissenschaftliche Medicin, 657-681.
3. Elsner, B., & Hommel, B. (2001). Effect anticipation and action control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 229-240.
4. Findlay, J. M., & Walker, R. (1999). A model of saccade generation based on parallel processing and competitive inhibition. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 661-674.
5. Greenwald, A. G. (1970). Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: With special reference to the ideomotor mechanism. Psychological Review, 77, 73-99.
6. Haazebroeck, P., & Hommel, B. (2009). Anticipative control of voluntary action: Towards a computational model. In G. Pezzulo, M. V. Butz, O. Sigaud, & G. Baldassarre (Eds.), Anticipatory behavior in adaptive learning systems- from psychological theories to artificial cognitive systems (pp. 31-47). Berlin: Springer.
7. Herwig, A., & Horstmann, G. (2011). Action-effect associations revealed by eye movements. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 531-537.
8. Hommel, B. (1996). The cognitive representation of action: Automatic integration of perceived action effects. Psychological Research, 59, 176-186.
9. Hommel, B. (2009). Action control according to TEC (theory of event coding). Psychological Research, 73, 512-526.
10. Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849-878.
11. Huestegge, L., & Koch, I. (2009). Dual-task crosstalk between saccades and manual responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 352-362.
12. Huestegge, L., & Koch, I. (2010a). Crossmodal action selection: Evidence from dual-task compatibility. Memory & Cognition, 38, 493-501.
13. Huestegge, L., & Koch, I. (2010b). Fixation disengagement enhances peripheral perceptual processing: Evidence for a perceptual gap effect. Experimental Brain Research, 201, 631-640.
14. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (2 vols.). New York: Henry Holt. Reprinted Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 1999.
15. Kunde, W. (2001). Response-effect compatibility in manual choice reaction tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 387-394.
16. Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. (2008). Two visual systems re-viewed. Neuropsychologia, 46, 774-785.
17. Stock, A., & Stock, C. (2004). A short history of ideo-motor action. Psychological Research, 68, 176-188.
18. Ziessler, M., & Nattkemper, D. (2011). The temporal dynamics of effect anticipation in action planning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 1305-1326.