Tailoring word alignments to syntactic machine translation

ACL 2007 - Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 17-24

  DeNero, John ^a   Klein, Dan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EXTRACTION SYSTEMS; MACHINE TRANSLATIONS; TARGET LANGUAGE; TREE TRANSDUCERS; WORD ALIGNMENT;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; FORESTRY; SYNTACTICS; TRANSDUCERS;

ALIGNMENT;

EID: 80053284503     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Necip Fazil Ayan and Bonnie J. Dorr. 2006. Going beyond aer:An extensive analysis of word alignments and their impact on mt. In ACL.
2. Peter F. Brown, Stephen A. Della Pietra, Vincent J. Della Pietra, and Robert L. Mercer. 1994. The mathematics of statistical machine translation: Parameter estimation. Computational Linguistics, 19:263-311.
3. Colin Cherry and Dekang Lin. 2006. Soft syntactic constraints for word alignment through discriminative training. In ACL.
4. David Chiang. 2005. A hierarchical phrase-based model for statistical machine translation. In ACL.
5. Hal Daumé III and Daniel Marcu. 2005. Induction of word and phrase alignments for automatic document summarization. Computational Linguistics, 31(4):505-530, December.
6. Michel Galley, Mark Hopkins, Kevin Knight, and Daniel Marcu. 2004. What's in a translation rule? In HLT-NAACL.
7. Michel Galley, Jonathan Graehl, Kevin Knight, Daniel Marcu, Steve DeNeefe, Wei Wang, and Ignacio Thayer. 2006. Scalable inference and training of context-rich syntactic translation models. In ACL.
8. Percy Liang, Ben Taskar, and Dan Klein. 2006. Alignment by agreement. In HLT-NAACL.
9. A. Lopez and P. Resnik. 2005. Improved hmm alignment models for languages with scarce resources. In ACL WPT-05.
10. I. Dan Melamed. 2004. Algorithms for syntax-aware statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of the Conference on Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Machine Translation.
11. Robert C. Moore. 2005. A discriminative framework for bilingual word alignment. In EMNLP.
12. Hermann Ney and Stephan Vogel. 1996. Hmm-based word alignment in statistical translation. In COLING.
13. Franz Josef Och and Hermann Ney. 2003. A systematic comparison of various statistical alignment models. Computational Linguistics, 29:19-51.
14. Ben Taskar, Simon Lacoste-Julien, and Dan Klein. 2005. A discriminative matching approach to word alignment. In EMNLP.
15. Dekai Wu. 1997. Stochastic inversion transduction grammars and bilingual parsing of parallel corpora. Computational Linguistics, 23:377-404.