Effective measures of domain similarity for parsing

ACL-HLT 2011 - Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies

Volumn 1, Issue , 2011, Pages 1566-1576

  Plank, Barbara ^a   Van Noord, Gertjan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOMAIN ADAPTATION; EFFECTIVE MEASURES; RANDOM DATA; TARGET DOMAIN; TEST SETS; TOPIC MODEL; TRAINING DATA;

DATA REDUCTION;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

EID: 84858301472     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. David M. Blei, Andrew Y. Ng, and Michael I. Jordan. 2003. Latent Dirichlet Allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3:993-1022.
2. John Blitzer, Ryan McDonald, and Fernando Pereira. 2006. Domain Adaptation with Structural Correspondence Learning. In Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Sydney, Australia.
3. Sabine Buchholz and Erwin Marsi. 2006. CoNLL-X Shared Task on Multilingual Dependency Parsing. In Proceedings of the 10th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL-X), pages 149-164, New York City.
4. Hal Daumé III. 2007. Frustratingly Easy Domain Adaptation. In Proceedings of the 45th Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Prague, Czech Republic.
5. Daniel Gildea. 2001. Corpus Variation and Parser Performance. In Proceedings of the 2001 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Pittsburgh, PA.
6. Tadayoshi Hara, Yusuke Miyao, and Jun'ichi Tsujii. 2005. Adapting a Probabilistic Disambiguation Model of an HPSG Parser to a New Domain. In Robert Dale, Kam-Fai Wong, Jian Su, and Oi Yee Kwong, editors, Natural Language Processing IJCNLP 2005, volume 3651 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 199-210. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg.
7. Rebecca Hwa. 2004. Sample Selection for Statistical Parsing. Compututational Linguistics, 30:253-276, September. (Pubitemid 41461900)
8. Jing Jiang and ChengXiang Zhai. 2007. Instance Weighting for Domain Adaptation in NLP. In Proceedings of the 45th Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 264-271, Prague, Czech Republic, June. Association for Computational Linguistics.
9. Richard Johansson and Pierre Nugues. 2007. Extended Constituent-to- dependency Conversion for English. In Proceedings of NODALIDA, Tartu, Estonia.
10. Lillian Lee. 2001. On the Effectiveness of the Skew Divergence for Statistical Language Analysis. In In Artificial Intelligence and Statistics 2001, pages 65-72, Key West, Florida.
11. J. Lin. 1991. Divergence measures based on the Shannon entropy. Information Theory, IEEE Transactions on, 37(1):145-151, January.
12. Tom Lippincott, Diarmuid Ó Séaghdha, Lin Sun, and Anna Korhonen. 2010. Exploring variation across biomedical subdomains. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 689-697, Beijing, China, August.
13. Christopher D. Manning and Hinrich Schütze. 1999. Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing. MIT Press, Cambridge Mass.
14. David McClosky, Eugene Charniak, and Mark Johnson. 2006. Effective Self-Training for Parsing. In Proceedings of Human Language Technology Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 152-159, Brooklyn, New York. Association for Computational Linguistics.
15. David McClosky, Eugene Charniak, and Mark Johnson. 2010. Automatic Domain Adaptation for Parsing. In Proceedings of Human Language Technology Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 28-36, Los Angeles, California, June. Association for Computational Linguistics.
16. Ryan McDonald, Fernando Pereira, Kiril Ribarov, and Jan Hajič. 2005. Non-projective Dependency Parsing using Spanning Tree Algorithms. In Proceedings of Human Language Technology Conference and Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 523-530, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, October. Association for Computational Linguistics.
17. Robert C. Moore and William Lewis. 2010. Intelligent Selection of Language Model Training Data. In Proceedings of the ACL 2010 Conference Short Papers, pages 220-224, Uppsala, Sweden, July. Association for Computational Linguistics.
18. Eric W. Noreen. 1989. Computer-Intensive Methods for Testing Hypotheses: An Introduction. Wiley-Interscience.
19. Slav Petrov, Pi-Chuan Chang, Michael Ringgaard, and Hiyan Alshawi. 2010. Uptraining for Accurate Deterministic Question Parsing. In Proceedings of the 2010 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 705-713, Cambridge, MA, October. Association for Computational Linguistics.
20. Barbara Plank and Khalil Sima'an. 2008. Subdomain Sensitive Statistical Parsing using Raw Corpora. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Marrakech, Morocco, May.
21. Barbara Plank and Gertjan van Noord. 2010. Grammar-Driven versus Data-Driven: Which Parsing System Is More Affected by Domain Shifts? In Proceedings of the 2010 Workshop on NLP and Linguistics: Finding the Common Ground, pages 25-33, Uppsala, Sweden, July. Association for Computational Linguistics.
22. Sujith Ravi, Kevin Knight, and Radu Soricut. 2008. Automatic Prediction of Parser Accuracy. In EMNLP '08: Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 887-896, Morristown, NJ, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
23. A. Rényi. 1961. On measures of information and entropy. In Proceedings of the 4th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematics, Statistics and Probability, pages 547-561, Berkeley.
24. Satoshi Sekine. 1997. The Domain Dependence of Parsing. In In Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing, pages 96-102, Washington D.C.
25. Mark Steyvers and Tom Griffiths, 2007. Probabilistic Topic Models. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
26. Mihai Surdeanu and Christopher D. Manning. 2010. Ensemble Models for Dependency Parsing: Cheap and Good? In Human Language Technologies: The 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 649-652, Los Angeles, California, June. Association for Computational Linguistics.
27. Vincent Van Asch and Walter Daelemans. 2010. Using Domain Similarity for Performance Estimation. In Proceedings of the 2010 Workshop on Domain Adaptation for Natural Language Processing, pages 31-36, Uppsala, Sweden, July. Association for Computational Linguistics.
28. Gertjan van Noord. 2006. At Last Parsing Is Now Operational. In TALN 2006 Verbum Ex Machina, Actes De La 13e Conference sur Le Traitement Automatique des Langues naturelles, pages 20-42, Leuven.
29. Bonnie Webber. 2009. Genre distinctions for Discourse in the Penn TreeBank. In Proceedings of the 47th Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 674-682, Suntec, Singapore, August. Association for Computational Linguistics.
30. Zhili Wu, Katja Markert, and Serge Sharoff. 2010. Fine- Grained Genre Classification Using Structural Learning Algorithms. In Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 749-759, Uppsala, Sweden, July. Association for Computational Linguistics.
31. Alexander Yeh. 2000. More accurate tests for the statistical significance of result differences. In Proceedings of the 18th conference on Computational linguistics, pages 947-953, Morristown, NJ, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.