Fine-grained genre classification using structural learning algorithms

ACL 2010 - 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 749-759

  Wu, Zhili ^a   Markert, Katja ^a   Sharoff, Serge ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION ACCURACY; GENRE CLASSIFICATION; PRIOR USE; STRUCTURAL CLASSIFIERS; STRUCTURAL LEARNING; SYRACUSE;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; PROFITABILITY; SOFTWARE AGENTS;

LEARNING ALGORITHMS;

EID: 84859047303     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Boser, B. E., Guyon, I. M., and Vapnik, V. N. (1992). A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers. In COLT '92: Proceedings of the fifth annual workshop on Computational learning theory, pages 144-152, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
2. Crammer, K. and Singer, Y. (2002). On the algorithmic implementation of multiclass kernelbased vector machines. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 2:265-292.
3. Cristianini, N., Shawe-Taylor, J., and Kandola, J. (2002). On kernel target alignment. In Proceedings of the Neural Information Processing Systems, NIPS'01, pages 367-373. MIT Press.
4. Crowston, K., Kwasnik, B., and Rubleske, J. (2009). Problems in the use-centered development of a taxonomy of web genres. In Mehler, A., Sharoff, S., and Santini, M., editors, Genres on the Web: Computational Models and Empirical Studies. Springer, Berlin/New York.
5. Dekel, O., Keshet, J., and Singer, Y. (2004). Large margin hierarchical classification. In ICML '04: Proceedings of the twenty-first international conference on Machine learning, page 27, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
6. Dietterich, T. G. (1998). Approximate statistical tests for comparing supervised classification learning algorithms. Neural Computation, 10:1895-1923.
7. Giesbrecht, E. and Evert, S. (2009). Part-of-Speech (POS) Tagging - a solved task? An evaluation of POS taggers for the Web as corpus. In Proceedings of the Fifth Web as Corpus Workshop (WAC5), pages 27-35, Donostia-San Sebastián.
8. Jiang, J. J. and Conrath, D. W. (1997). Semantic similarity based on corpus statistics and lexical taxonomy. CoRR, cmp-lg/9709008.
9. Joachims, T. (1999). Making large-scale SVM learning practical. In Schölkopf, B., Burges, C., and Smola, A., editors, Advances in Kernel Methods - Support Vector Learning, pages 41-56. MIT Press.
10. Joachims, T., Finley, T., and Yu, C.-N. (2009). Cutting-plane training of structural svms. Machine Learning, 77(1):27-59.
11. Kanaris, I. and Stamatatos, E. (2009). Learning to recognize webpage genres. Information Processing and Management, 45:499-512.
12. Karlgren, J. and Cutting, D. (1994). Recognizing text genres with simple metrics using discriminant analysis. In Proc. of the 15th. International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 94), pages 1071 - 1075,Kyoto, Japan.
13. Keerthi, S. S., Sundararajan, S., Chang, K.-W., Hsieh, C.-J., and Lin, C.-J. (2008). A sequential dual method for large scale multiclass linear svms. In KDD '08: Proceeding of the 14th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 408-416, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
14. th EACL, pages 32-38.
15. Kučera, H. and Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Brown University Press, Providence.
16. Leacock, C. and Chodorow, M. (1998). Combining local context and WordNet similarity for word sense identification, pages 305-332. In C. Fellbaum (Ed.), MIT Press.
17. Lee, D. (2001). Genres, registers, text types, domains, and styles: clarifying the concepts and navigating a path through the BNC jungle. Language Learning and Technology, 5(3):37-72.
18. Lin, D. (1998). An information-theoretic definition of similarity. In ICML '98: Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 296-304,San Francisco, CA, USA. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
19. Meyer zu Eissen, S. and Stein, B. (2004). Genre classification of web pages. In Proceedings of the 27th German Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Ulm, Germany.
20. Pedersen, T., Pakhomov, S. V. S., Patwardhan, S., and Chute, C. G. (2007). Measures of semantic similarity and relatedness in the biomedical domain. J. of Biomedical Informatics, 40(3):288-299.
21. Resnik, P. (1995). Using information content to evaluate semantic similarity in a taxonomy. In IJCAI'95: Proceedings of the 14th international joint conference on Artificial intelligence, pages 448-453, San Francisco, CA, USA. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
22. Santini, M. (2007). Automatic Identification of Genre in Web Pages. PhD thesis, University of Brighton.
23. Shao, K.-T. and Sokal, R. R. (1990). Tree balance. Systematic Zoology, 39(3):266-276.
24. Sharoff, S., Wu, Z., and Markert, K. (2010). The Web library of Babel: evaluating genre collections. In Proc. of the Seventh Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, LREC 2010, Malta.
25. Stubbe, A. and Ringlstetter, C. (2007). Recognizing genres. In Santini, M. and Sharoff, S., editors, Proc. Towards a Reference Corpus of Web Genres.
26. Tsochantaridis, I., Joachims, T., Hofmann, T., and Altun, Y. (2005). Large margin methods for structured and interdependent output variables. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 6:1453-1484.
27. Vidulin, V., Luštrek, M., and Gams, M. (2007). Using genres to improve search engines. In Proc. Towards Genre-Enabled Search Engines: The Impact of NLP. RANLP-07.
28. Webber, B. (2009). Genre distinctions for discourse in the Penn TreeBank. In Proc the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL, pages 674-682.
29. Wu, Z. and Palmer, M. (1994). Verbs semantics and lexical selection. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 133-138,Morristown, NJ, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.