An in silico approach for evaluating a fraction-based, risk assessment method for total petroleum hydrocarbon mixtures

Journal of Toxicology

Volumn 2012, Issue , 2012, Pages

  Wang, Nina Ching Y ^a   Rice, Glenn E ^a   Teuschler, Linda K ^a   Colman, Joan ^b   Yang, Raymond S H ^c  

^a U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

^b SYRACUSE RESEARCH CORPORATION   (United States)

^c Veterinary Dentistry and Oral Surgery   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PETROLEUM DERIVATIVE;

ARTICLE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE MOLECULAR FIELD ANALYSIS; COMPUTER MODEL; FRACTIONATION; HIERARCHICAL CLUSTERING; MOLECULAR MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; TOXICITY;

EID: 84858299749     PISSN: 16878191     EISSN: 16878205     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1155/2012/410143     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) 2010 Washington, DC, USA Office of Research and Development
2. MADEP (Massachusettes Department of Environmental Protection), Characterizing Risks Posed by Petroleum Contaminated Sites: Implementation of the MADEP VPH/EPH Approach 2002 Boston, Mass, USA Cleanup
3. MADEP (Massachusettes Department of Environmental Protection), Updated Petroleum Hydrocarbon Fraction Toxicity Values for the VPH/EPH/APH Methodology 2003 Boston, Mass, USA Office of Research and Standards
4. TPHCWG (Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon Criteria Working Group), Selection of Representative TPH Fractions Based on Fate and Transport Considerations 1997 3 Amherst, Mass, USA Amherst Scientific Publishers
5. TPHCWG (Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon Criteria Working Group), Development of Fraction Specific Reference Doses (RfDs) and Reference Concentrations (RfCs) for Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) 1997 4 Amherst, Mass, USA Amherst Scientific Publishers
6. TPHCWG (Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon Criteria Working Group), Petroleum Hydrocarbon Analysis of Soil andWater in the Environment 1998 1 Amherst, Mass, USA Amherst Scientific Publishers
7. TPHCWG (Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon Criteria Working Group), Composition of Petroleum Mixtures 1998 2 Amherst, Mass, USA Amherst Scientific Publishers
8. TPHCWG (Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon Criteria Working Group), Human Health Risk-Based Evaluation of Petroleum Release Sites: Implementing the Working Group Approach 1999 5 Amherst, Mass, USA Amherst Scientific Publishers
9. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Supplementary Guidance for Conducting Health Risk Assessment of Chemical Mixtures 2000 Washington, DC, USA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency EPA/630/R-00/002
10. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Provisional Guidance for Quantitative Risk Assessment of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons 1993 Cincinnati, OH, USA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency EPA/600/R-93/089
11. Teuschler L. K., Deciding which chemical mixtures risk assessment methods work best for what mixtures Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 2007 223 2 139 147 (Pubitemid 47351239)
12. Béliveau M., Krishnan K., A spreadsheet program for modeling quantitative structure-pharmacokinetic relationships for inhaled volatile organics in humans SAR and QSAR in Environmental Research 2005 16 1-2 63 77 (Pubitemid 40623243)
13. Béliveau M., Tardif R., Krishnan K., Quantitative structure-property relationships for physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling of volatile organic chemicals in rats Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 2003 189 3 221 232 (Pubitemid 36677533)
14. Knaak J. B., Dary C. C., Power F., Thompson C. B., Blancato J. N., Physicochemical and biological data for the development of predictive organophosphorus pesticide QSARs and PBPK/PD models for human risk assessment Critical Reviews in Toxicology 2004 34 2 143 207 (Pubitemid 38443367)
15. Venkatapathy R., Wang C. Y., Bruce R. M., Moudgal C., Development of quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models to predict the carcinogenic potency of chemicals. I. Alternative toxicity measures as an estimator of carcinogenic potency Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 2009 234 2 209 221
16. Halgren T. A., MMFF VI. MMFF94s option for energy minimization studies Journal of Computational Chemistry 1999 20 7 720 729 (Pubitemid 129652635)
17. Cramer R. D., Patterson D. E., Bunce J. D., Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA). 1. Effect of shape on binding of steroids to carrier proteins Journal of the American Chemical Society 1988 110 18 5959 5967
18. Izumi H., Kimura E., Ota T., Shimazu S., A two-generation reproductive toxicity study of n-butylbenzene in rats Journal of Toxicological Sciences 2005 30 21 38 (Pubitemid 44661499)