Environmental assessment of energy production based on long term commercial willow plantations in Sweden

Science of the Total Environment

Volumn 421-422, Issue , 2012, Pages 210-219

  González García, Sara ^a,b   Mola Yudego, Blas ^c,d   Dimitriou, Ioannis ^d   Aronsson, Pär ^d   Murphy, Richard ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SANTIAGO DE COMPOSTELA   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

^d SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Commercial plantations; Life Cycle Assessment (LCA); Salix spp.; Short rotation coppice (SRC); Sweden

Indexed keywords

COMMERCIAL PLANTATION; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT (LCA); SALIX SPP; SHORT ROTATION COPPICE; SWEDEN;

BIOMASS; ENERGY MANAGEMENT; EUTROPHICATION; GLOBAL WARMING; LIFE CYCLE; NITROGEN FERTILIZERS; OZONE LAYER;

TOXICITY;

FERTILIZER; NITROGEN;

AGRICULTURAL MANAGEMENT; ALTERNATIVE ENERGY; BIOMASS; COPPICE; ECOTOXICOLOGY; ENERGY RESOURCE; EUTROPHICATION; GLOBAL WARMING; INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; PLANTATION; STANDARD (REFERENCE);

ACIDIFICATION; ARTICLE; BIOMASS PRODUCTION; DRY WEIGHT; ECOTOXICITY; ENERGY YIELD; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; EUTROPHICATION; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT; OZONE LAYER; PHYTOCHEMISTRY; PLANTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOIL FERTILIZATION; SWEDEN; WILLOW;

BIOFUELS; BIOMASS; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION; FERTILIZERS; FORESTRY; NITROGEN; SALIX; SWEDEN;

SWEDEN;

SALIX;

EID: 84858297462     PISSN: 00489697     EISSN: 18791026     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.01.041     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Abrahamson L.P., Robison D.J., Volk T.A., White E.H., Neuhauser E.F., Benjamin W.H., et al. Sustainability and environmental issues associated with willow bioenergy development in New York (U.S.A.). Biomass Bioenerg 1998, 15:17-22.
2. Althaus H.J., Chudacoff M., Hischier R., Jungbluth N., Osses M., Primas A. Life cycle inventories of chemicals. Ecoinvent report no. 8, v2.0 EMPA 2007, Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Dübendorf, Switzerland.
3. American Society of Agricultural Engineers ASAE standards: agricultural machinery management 1999, Report No. ASAE EP496.2 DEC98.
4. American Society of Agricultural Engineers ASAE standards: agricultural machinery management data 1999, Report No. ASAE D497.4 JAN98.
5. Aronsson P., Perttu K. Willow vegetation filters for wastewater treatment and soil remediation combined with biomass production. Forestry Chron 2001, 77:293-299.
6. Audsley E (Coord.), Alber S, Clift R, Cowell S, Crettaz P, Gaillard G, et al. Harmonisation of environmental life cycle assessment for agriculture. Final Report. Concerted Action AIR3-CT94-2028. European Commission. DG VI Agriculture. SRI, Silsoe, UK; 1997.
7. Baum C., Leinweber P., Weih M., Lamersdorf N., Dimitriou I. Effects of short rotation coppice with willows and poplar on soil ecology. Landbauforschung - vTI Agric For Res 2009, 3(59):183-196.
8. Börjesson P. Environmental effects of energy crop cultivation in Sweden - part I: identification and quantification. Biomass Bioenerg 1999, 16:137-154.
9. Börjesson P., Tufvesson L.M. Agricultural crop-based biofuels - resource efficiency and environmental performance including direct land use changes. J Clean Prod 2011, 19:108-120.
10. Brentrup F., Küsters J., Lammel J., Kuhlmann H. Methods to estimate on-field nitrogen emissions from crop production as an input to LCA studies in the agricultural sector. Int J Life Cycle Assess 2000, 5:349-357.
11. Brentrup F., Küsters J., Kuhlmann H., Lammel J. Application of the life cycle assessment methodology to agricultural production: an example of sugar beet production with different forms of nitrogen fertilisers. Eur J Agron 2001, 14:221-233.
12. Brentrup F., Küsters J., Lammel J., Barraclough P., Kuhlmann H. Environmental impact assessment of agricultural production systems using the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology II. The application to N fertilizer use in winter wheat production systems. Eur J Agron 2004, 20:265-279.
13. Charles R., Jolliet O., Gaillard G., Pellet D. Environmental analysis of intensity level in wheat crop production using life cycle assessment. Agr Ecosyst Environ 2006, 113:216-225.
14. Danfors B., Ledin S., Rosenqvist H. Energiskogsodling. handledning för odlare. JTI informerar: 1 1997.
15. Dimitriou I., Aronsson P. Wastewater and sewage sludge application to willows and poplars grown in lysimeters - Plant response and treatment efficiency. Biomass Bioenerg 2011, 5(1):161-170.
16. Dimitriou I., Rosenqvist H. Sewage sludge and wastewater fertilisation of Short Rotation Coppice (SRC) for increased bioenergy production - biological and economic potential. Biomass Bioenerg 2011, 35(2):835-842.
17. Dimitriou I., Baum C., Baum S., Busch G., Schulz U., Köhn J., et al. The impact of Short Rotation Coppice (SRC) cultivation on the environment. Landbauforschung - vTI Agric Forestry Res 2009, 3(59):159-162.
18. Dimitriou I., Busch G., Jacobs S., Schmidt-Walter P., Lamersdorf N. A review of the impacts of Short Rotation Coppice cultivation on water issues. Landbauforschung - vTI Agric Forestry Res 2009, 3(59):197-206.
19. Eisentraut A. Sustainable production of second-generation biofuels. Potential and perspectives in major economies and developing countries. Information paper 2010, International Energy Agency, Available from:, (cited May 2011). http://www.iea.org/papers/2010/second_generation_biofuels.pdf.
20. EMEP/CORINAIR Atmospheric emission inventory guidebook. Technical report, No. 11 2006, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark.
21. Gasol C.M., Gabarrell X., Anton A., Rigola M., Carrasco J., Ciria P., et al. LCA of poplar bioenergy system compared with Brassica carinata energy crop and natural gas in regional scenario. Biomass Bioenerg 2009, 33(1):119-129.
22. Gasol C.M., Brun F., Mosso A., Rieradevall J., Gabarrell X. Economic assessment and comparison of acacia energy crop with annual traditional crops in Southern Europe. Energy Policy 2010, 38:592-597.
23. González-García S., Berg S., Feijoo G., Moreira M.T. Environmental impacts of forest production and supply of pulpwood: Spanish and Swedish case studies. Int J Life Cycle Ass 2009, 14:340-353.
24. Guinée JB (final editor), Gorrée M, Heijungs R, Huppes G, Kleijn R, de Koning A, et al. Life cycle assessment: an operational guide to the ISO standards. Final report, May 2001. Centre of Environmental Science, Leiden University, Leiden; 2001.
25. Halberg N. Indicators of resource use and environmental impact for use in a decision aid for Danish livestock farmers. Agric Ecosyst Environ 1999, 76:17-30.
26. Hauschild M.Z. Estimating pesticide emissions for LCA of agricultural products. Agricultural data for life cycle assessments 2000, vol. 2:64-79. LCANet Food, The Hague, The Netherlands. B.P. Weidema, M.J.G. Meeusen (Eds.).
27. Helby P., Börjesson P., Hansen A.C., Roos A., Rosenqvist H., Takeuchi L. Market development problems for sustainable bio-energy systems in Sweden. (The BIOMARK project). IMES/EESS Report 38 2004, Energy Environmental System Studies, Lund, Sweden.
28. Heller M.C., Keoleian G.A., Volk T.A. Life cycle assessment of a willow bioenergy cropping system. Biomass Bioenerg 2003, 25:147-165.
29. Heller M.C., Keoleian G.A., Mann M.K., Volk T.A. Life cycle energy and environmental benefits of generating electricity from willow biomass. Renew Energ 2004, 29:1023-1042.
30. Hillier J., Whittaker C., Dailey G., Aylotts M., Casella E., Richter G.M., et al. Greenhouse gas emissions from four bioenergy crops in England and Wales: integrating spatial estimates of yield and soil carbon balance in life cycle analyses. GCB Bioenergy 2009, 1:267-281.
31. Hischier R., Weidema B., Althaus H.J., Bauer C., Doka G., Dones R., et al. Implementation of life cycle impact assessment methods, ecoinvent report no. 3, v2.1 2009, Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Dübendorf.
32. ISO 14040 Environmental management-life cycle assessment-principles and framework 2006.
33. ISO 14044 Environmental management - life cycle assessment - requirements and guidelines 2006.
34. Karp A., Shield I. Bioenergy from plants and sustainable yield challenge. New Phytol 2008, 179:15-32.
35. Keoleian G.A., Volk T.A. Renewable energy from willow biomass crops: life cycle energy, environmental and economic performance. Crit Rev Plant Sci 2005, 24:385-406.
36. Larsen H.F., Birkved M., Hauschild M., Pennington D.W., Guinée J.B. Evaluation of selection methods for toxicological impacts in LCA. Recommendations for OMNIITOX. Int J Life Cycle Assess 2004, 9:307-319.
37. Larsson S. Genetic improvement of willow for short-rotation coppice. Biomass Bioenerg 1998, 15(1):23-26.
38. Larsson S., Dobrzeniecki P. Agrobränsle AB - the world's leading authority on commercial short rotation willow (salix) coppice (SRC). Proceedings from the conference "Rozwój energii odnawialna na Pomorzu Zachodnim" 2004.
39. Lewis K.A., Newbold M.J., Tzilivakis J. Developing an emissions inventory from farm data. J Environ Manage 1999, 55:183-197.
40. Malik R.K., Green T.H., Brown G.F., Beyl C.A., Sistani K.R., Mays D.A. Biomass production of short-rotation bioenergy hardwood plantations affected by cover crops. Biomass Bioenerg 2001, 21:21-33.
41. Manzone M., Airoldi G., Balsari P. Energetic and economic evaluation of a poplar cultivation for the biomass production in Italy. Biomass Bioenerg 2009, 33:1258-1264.
42. Matthews R.W. Modelling of energy and carbon budgets of wood fuel coppice systems. Biomass Bionerg 2001, 21:1-19.
43. Milà i Canals L., Burnip G.M., Cowell S.J. Evaluation of the environmental impacts of apple production using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA): case study in New Zealand. Agr Ecosyst Environ 2006, 114:226-238.
44. Mola-Yudego B. Regional potential yields of short rotation willow plantations on agricultural land in Northern Europe. Silva Fenn 2010, 44(1):63-76.
45. Mola-Yudego B., Aronsson P. Yield models for commercial willow biomass plantations in Sweden. Biomass Bioenerg 2008, 32(9):829-837.
46. Mola-Yudego B., González-Olabarria J. Mapping the expansion and distribution of willow plantations for bioenergy in Sweden: lessons to be learned about the spread of energy crops. Biomass Bioenerg 2010, 34(4):442-448.
47. Mola-Yudego B., Pelkonen P. The effects of policy incentives in the adoption of willow short rotation coppice for bioenergy in Sweden. Energy Policy 2008, 36(8):3062-3068.
48. Mortensen J.V., Nielsen K.H., Jørgensen U. Nitrate leaching during establishment of willow (Salix viminalis) on two soil types and at two fertilisation levels. Biomass Bioenerg 1998, 15:457-466.
49. Neinavaie F. Treatment and utilization of pulp industry residues using Short Rotation Forestry 2011, Available from:, (cited May, 2011). http://www.slu.se/Global/externwebben/nl-fak/vaxtproduktionsekologi/DokPublikation/Sjalvstandigaarbeten/ShortRotationForestry_Fargam%20Neinavaie110331.pdf.
50. Nemecek T., Käggi T. Life cycle inventories of agricultural production systems. Final report ecoinvent v2.0 No. 15a. Agroscope FAL Reckenholz and FAT Taenikon 2007, Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Zurich and Dübendorf, Switzerland.
51. Payraudeau S., van der Werf H.M.G. Environmental impact assessment for a farming region: a review of methods. Agric Ecosyst Environ 2005, 107:1-19.
52. Pizzigallo A.C.I., Granai C., Borsa S. The joint use of LCA and energy evaluation for the analysis of two Italian wine farms. J Environ Manage 2008, 86:396-406.
53. PRé Consultants (cited March, 2011). http://www.pre.nl.
54. Rosenqvist H., Roos A., Ling E., Hektor B. Willow growers in Sweden. Biomass Bionerg 2000, 18:137-145.
55. Spielmann M., Bauer C., Dones R., Tuchschmid M. Transport services. Ecoinvent report No. 14 2007, Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Dübendorf, Switzerland.
56. van der Werf H.M.G. Hemp production in France. J Ind Hemp 2002, 7:105-109.
57. van der Werf H.M.G., Petit J. Evaluation of the environmental impact of agriculture at the farm level: a comparison and analysis of 12 indicator-based methods. Agr Ecosyst Environ 2002, 93:131-145.
58. van der Werf H.M.G., Tzilivakis J., Lewis K., Basset-Mens C. Environmental impacts of farm scenarios according to five assessment methods. Agr Ecosyst Environ 2007, 118:327-338.
59. Venturi P., Gigler J.K., Huisman W. Economical and technical comparison between herbaceous (Miscanthus X Giganteous) and woody energy crops (Salix Viminalis). Renew Energy 1999, 16:1023-1026.
60. Weih M., Nordh N.-E. Determination of biomass production in hybrid willows and prediction of field performance from pot studies. Tree Physiol 2005, 25:1197-1206.